IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i9p1722-d1232711.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Land Use Management Strategies through Morphological Spatial Patterns Using a Climate–Socioeconomic-Based Land Use Simulation Modeling Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Yusong Xie

    (Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan)

  • Katsue Fukamachi

    (Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan)

  • Wen Wang

    (Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan)

  • Shozo Shibata

    (Graduate School of Agriculture, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
    Graduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan)

Abstract

Facing future complex climate changes and global economic fluctuations, land use and land cover (LULC) simulation is recognized as an important initiative to support government decision-making. In this study, a comprehensive LULC simulation modeling framework was proposed based on the PLUS and InVEST models. The Kinki metropolis in Japan was chosen as a case to simulate future LULC changes under four SSP–RCP (126, 245, 370, and 585) scenarios, and to calculate carbon storage (CS) from 2040 to 2100. The results show that cultivated land will decrease while forests will increase, except under scenario SSP585. The artificial surface will increase except under SSP370. The CS changes are significantly correlated with forest area changes. Furthermore, this study highlights the significance of analyzing and discussing future LULCs under wide-area planning. Spatial pattern, morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA), and Pearson correlation analysis were used to explore the characteristics of the LULC types. The results reveal that the prefectures within the Kinki metropolitan area can be classified into three groups based on the spatial pattern indices change of the artificial surface. Most cultivated land is concentrated in important patches and corridors (area larger than 40,000 m 2 ), accounting for over 90% of the total area, while the number is less than 25%. Forests will become more aggregated, and different MSPA classes will have varying impacts on CS changes. This study comprehensively analyzed and validated the feasibility of the simulation results from different LULC perspectives, comparing the similarities and differences in the development of prefectures. Additionally, this research provides a comprehensive framework for integrating simulated LULC types with policy discussions to better guide LULC planning and policy formulation in metropolitan Kinki.

Suggested Citation

  • Yusong Xie & Katsue Fukamachi & Wen Wang & Shozo Shibata, 2023. "Exploring Land Use Management Strategies through Morphological Spatial Patterns Using a Climate–Socioeconomic-Based Land Use Simulation Modeling Framework," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1722-:d:1232711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1722/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/9/1722/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kimisato Oda & Christoph D. D. Rupprecht & Kazuaki Tsuchiya & Steven R. McGreevy, 2018. "Urban Agriculture as a Sustainability Transition Strategy for Shrinking Cities? Land Use Change Trajectory as an Obstacle in Kyoto City, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-15, April.
    2. Stamatia Nasiakou & Michael Vrahnakis & Dimitrios Chouvardas & Georgios Mamanis & Vassiliki Kleftoyanni, 2022. "Land Use Changes for Investments in Silvoarable Agriculture Projected by the CLUE-S Spatio-Temporal Model," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Guangzhao Chen & Xia Li & Xiaoping Liu & Yimin Chen & Xun Liang & Jiye Leng & Xiaocong Xu & Weilin Liao & Yue’an Qiu & Qianlian Wu & Kangning Huang, 2020. "Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. Guandong Su & Hidenori Okahashi & Lin Chen, 2018. "Spatial Pattern of Farmland Abandonment in Japan: Identification and Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han Li & Wei Song, 2021. "Cropland Abandonment and Influencing Factors in Chongqing, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Zhang, Pengyan & Yang, Dan & Qin, Mingzhou & Jing, Wenlong, 2020. "Spatial heterogeneity analysis and driving forces exploring of built-up land development intensity in Chinese prefecture-level cities and implications for future Urban Land intensive use," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    3. Linghua Qiu & Junhao He & Chao Yue & Philippe Ciais & Chunmiao Zheng, 2024. "Substantial terrestrial carbon emissions from global expansion of impervious surface area," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Wancong Li & Hong Li & Shijun Wang & Zhiqiang Feng, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of County-Level Land Use Structure in the Context of Urban Shrinkage: Evidence from Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    5. Shinichi Kitano, 2021. "Estimation of Determinants of Farmland Abandonment and Its Data Problems," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Juan Carlos Alías & José Antonio Mejías & Natividad Chaves, 2022. "Effect of Cropland Abandonment on Soil Carbon Stock in an Agroforestry System in Southwestern Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    7. Xiangdong Wang & Decheng Zhao, 2023. "Study on the Causes of Differences in Cropland Abandonment Levels among Farming Households Based on Hierarchical Linear Model—13,120 Farming Households in 26 Provinces of China as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
    8. Ana Luiza Fontenelle & Erik Nilsson & Ieda Geriberto Hidalgo & Cintia B. Uvo & Drielli Peyerl, 2022. "Temporal Understanding of the Water–Energy Nexus: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    9. Tuan Nguyen Tran, 2024. "Comparing the process of converting land use purposes between socio-economic regions in Vietnam from 2007 to 2020," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(3), pages 51-62.
    10. Hongbo Guo & Enzai Du & César Terrer & Robert B. Jackson, 2024. "Global distribution of surface soil organic carbon in urban greenspaces," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Inga C. Melchior & Jens Newig, 2021. "Governing Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture—Taking Stock of an Emerging Field of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    12. Minjie Li & Jian Wang & Yihui Chen, 2019. "Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Sustainable Development Capability of Agriculture in Countries along the Belt and Road Route," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, April.
    13. Joohun Han & Chanjin Chung, 2021. "Impact of Aging and Underemployment on Income Disparity between Agricultural and Non-Agricultural Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Di Zhan & Bin Quan & Jia Liao, 2025. "The Spatiotemporal Evolution and Coupling Coordination of LUCC and Landscape Ecological Risk in Ecologically Vulnerable Areas: A Case Study of the Wanzhou–Dazhou–Kaizhou Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Martinson Ankrah Twumasi & Bright Senyo Dogbe & Ernest Kwarko Ankrah & Zhao Ding & Yuansheng Jiang, 2023. "Assessing Financial Literacy and Farmland Abandonment Relationship in Ghana," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    16. Abdullah Al Mamun & Naeem Hayat & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Anas A. Salameh & Syed Shah Alam, 2023. "Green Gardening Practices Among Urban Botanists: Using the Value-Belief-Norm Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    17. Kong, Xuesong & Fu, Mengxue & Zhao, Xiang & Wang, Jing & Jiang, Ping, 2022. "Ecological effects of land-use change on two sides of the Hu Huanyong Line in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    18. Jianqiao Zhao & Yue Cao & Le Yu & Xiaoxuan Liu & Yichuan Shi & Xiaoping Liu & Rui Yang & Peng Gong, 2021. "Identifying Potential Cropland Losses When Conserving 30% and 50% Earth with Different Approaches and Spatial Scales," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    19. Wu, Xiaoran & Zhao, Na & Wang, Yuwei & Zhang, Liqiang & Wang, Wei & Liu, Yansui, 2024. "Cropland non-agriculturalization caused by the expansion of built-up areas in China during 1990–2020," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    20. Letycja Sołoducho-Pelc & Adam Sulich, 2022. "Natural Environment Protection Strategies and Green Management Style: Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:9:p:1722-:d:1232711. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.