IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i5p276-d1657948.html

Governance, Ownership Structure, and Financial Leverage: The Role of Board Gender Diversity in UK Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Dramani Angsoyiri

    (Lincoln International Business School, College of Arts Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

  • Fadi Alkaraan

    (Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK
    Gulf Financial Center, Gulf University for Science and Technology, Mishref, P.O. Box 7207, Hawally 32093, Kuwait)

  • Judith John

    (Lincoln International Business School, College of Arts Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Lincoln, Lincoln LN6 7TS, UK)

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the relationship between governance structure, ownership structure, and financial leverage of corporations in the UK, with a special emphasis on the boardroom gender diversity. The study sample includes 484 UK firms from the FTSE All-Share Index for the period (2015–2023), with 4356 firm-year observations. The results show that CEO duality, gender diversity, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and government shareholding are all positively associated with financial leverage, thus confirming the importance of these governance and ownership characteristics in determining capital structure policies. On the other hand, board size and the proportion of non-executive directors are not found to have a significant impact on financial leverage, which points to some room for improvement in UK board practices. In this regard, the study contributes to the governance-sustainability-finance nexus discussion by focusing on these dimensions in the UK corporate sector. As such, the findings of this study are important in providing policy recommendations for policymakers and corporate leaders and contribute to the ongoing wave of global corporate governance reforms and practical insights into enhancing governance frameworks at the firm level.

Suggested Citation

  • Dramani Angsoyiri & Fadi Alkaraan & Judith John, 2025. "Governance, Ownership Structure, and Financial Leverage: The Role of Board Gender Diversity in UK Firms," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:276-:d:1657948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra Alves, 2023. "Do female directors affect accounting conservatism in European Union?," Cogent Business & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 2219088-221, December.
    2. Alkaraan, Fadi & Elmarzouky, Mahmoud & Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Gulko, Nadia, 2025. "Maximising sustainable performance: Integrating servitisation innovation into green sustainable supply chain management under the influence of governance and Industry 4.0," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    3. Paul Guest, 2009. "The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 385-404.
    4. Fadi Alkaraan & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa Jabbour & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Nadia Gulko, 2025. "Maximising Sustainable Performance: Integrating Servitisation Innovation into Green Sustainable Supply Chain Management under the Influence of Governance and Industry 4.0," Post-Print hal-04846579, HAL.
    5. Muhammad Akhtar & Kong Yusheng & Muhammad Haris & Qurat Ul Ain & Hafiz Mustansar Javaid, 2022. "Impact of financial leverage on sustainable growth, market performance, and profitability," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 737-774, May.
    6. Laura Mehnaz & Cherrie Yang, 2025. "Women in accounting research: a review of gender diversity, equity and inclusion," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 30-59, February.
    7. Oliver Hart & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 1997. "The Proper Scope of Government: Theory and an Application to Prisons," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(4), pages 1127-1161.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alharbi, Samar S. & Tabash, Mosab I. & Farooq, Umar & Issa, Suzan Sameer, 2025. "How does climate policy uncertainty determine green innovation adoption? New perspectives from the BRICS," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    2. Fan, Yali & Wang, Ruofei & Alkaraan, Fadi & Wu, Wei, 2025. "Decoding greenwashing practices toward sustainability: The synergistic influence of governance structure and policy-derive rhetorical strategies," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    3. Zohreh Ali Esmaeili & Yaser Sobhanifard, 2025. "Navigating the Sustainable Business Model: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis at the Intersection of Circular Economy and Innovation Management in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(8), pages 6825-6861, December.
    4. Moustafa Elnadi & Mohamed Hani Gheith & Ciro Troise & Yasser Omar Abdallah & Mahmoud Abdelaziz Ahmed Abdelaziz, 2026. "Digital Transformation and Sustainable Supply Chain Performance for Sustainable Development: The Mediating Role of Supply Chain Capabilities," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(S1), pages 611-637, January.
    5. Sikandar Rahman & Sheikh Adeel & Murad Ali & Saleh Bajaba & Hengky Latan, 2026. "Power of Green Capabilities and Artificial Intelligence (AI): Understanding How and When Green Innovation Promotes Sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(2), pages 2502-2525, February.
    6. Ayman wael Al‐khatib & Mohammad A. A. Zaid, 2026. "How Is Intellectual Capital Reshaping Sustainable Supply Chain Outcomes? Exploring the Mediating Effects of Circular Innovation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 1173-1190, January.
    7. Agnes Nyamenaose Essuman & Frank Agyemang Karikari & Seth Acquah Boateng & Simplice A. Asongu & Michael Provide Fumey, 2026. "An Outlook at Corporate Environmental Performance Through the Lens of Green Supply Chain Management, Green Innovation, Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities, and Governance Quality in an Emerging Economy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(1), pages 1317-1334, January.
    8. Bag, Surajit & Rahman, Muhammad Sabbir & Routray, Susmi & Khurana, Reema, 2025. "Regenerative supply chain orientation and coopetition in supply chain networks for ESG initiatives: A parallel mediation study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    9. Deepak Sharma & Naveen Virmani & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Pravin Kumar & R. P. Mohanty, 2025. "Leveraging Green Innovation, Organizational Learning, and Institutional Pressure to Enhance Supply Chain Flexibility: A Petroleum Refinery Perspective using SAP-LAP and e-IRP," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(3), pages 543-569, September.
    10. Li, Jing, 2026. "How does green credit reshape the tourism industry chain? Dual path verification driving corporate green innovation and social welfare enhancement," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    11. Jie Cheng & Ni Sun & Ya-Nan Zou & Ke-Bin Lu & Dan-Dan Wang, 2025. "Leveraging Big Data Analytics Capability and Green Supplier Integration for Improved Economic, Social, and Environmental Sustainability in Manufacturing Companies," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    12. Yang, Yiqu & Wang, Lingkang, 2026. "ESG performance, investment efficiency and supply chain resilience," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    13. Yutong Sun & Meili Zhang & Jingping Chang & Chenggang Wang, 2025. "Unpacking Boundary-Spanning Search and Green Innovation for Sustainability: The Role of AI Capabilities in the Chinese Manufacturing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Yuetao Yang & Bushra Tufail & YunQian Zhang & Aisha Khan, 2026. "Linking strategic green supply chain practices, upcycling, and innovation with sustainable entrepreneurship: the role of green leadership in construction industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-20, March.
    15. Zheng, Sheng & Babu, Mujahid Mohiuddin & Metreveli, Alexandre & Dey, Bidit Lal & Koufopoulos, Dimitrios, 2026. "Impact of relationship dynamics on policy reform for sustainable innovation in public healthcare in China: Social exchange theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    16. Ahmad Alqatan & Walid Simmou & Maha Shehadeh & Faisal AlReshaid & Mahmoud Elmarzouky & Doaa Shohaieb, 2025. "Strategic Pathways to Corporate Sustainability: The Roles of Transformational Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Barman, Abhijit & Sana, Shib Sankar, 2025. "Decision-making in sustainable dual-channel supply chain under carbon trading, risk aversion, and government subsidy policy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Mehdi Shiva & Clare FitzGerald & Eleanor Carter & Mara Airoldi, 2024. "Beyond “make” or “buy”: Evaluating value‐for‐money in public service delivery," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 95(4), pages 1171-1196, December.
    19. Yann Algan & Pierre Cahuc & André Zylberberg, 2002. "L'emploi public : un remède au chômage ?," Revue économique, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 53(3), pages 589-598.
    20. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:276-:d:1657948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.