IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v18y2025i5p246-d1648008.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“Feeling Stressed?” A Critical Analysis of the Regulatory Prescribed Stress Tests for Financial Services in the UK

Author

Listed:
  • Stavros Pantos

    (School of Law, Foxhill House, Whiteknights Road, University of Reading, Reading RG6 7BA, UK)

Abstract

This paper captures a qualitative review of the regulatory prescribed stress tests for UK financial services designed by the Bank of England and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)/Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) after the Global Financial Crisis. It presents a critical analysis of the use of stress testing as part of supervisory practices for UK banking institutions and insurance undertakings, commenting on their qualitative characteristics, after looking at the regulatory prescribed stress tests from three key categories: the macroeconomic scenarios for banks, denoted as the bank stress tests (BST), the insurance stress tests (IST), and the biennial exploratory scenarios (BES). In this study, five trends describing regulatory prescribed stress are identified: (1) the regulatory collaboration, (2) cross-industry stress tests, (3) exploratory scenarios, (4) reporting and disclosure requirements, and (5) the underlying modelling capabilities and tools. The associated challenges of (A) governance, (B) frequency, (C) individual disclosures, (D) data and modelling, and (E) capabilities and skillset from participating institutions underpinning these stresses are highlighted, shaping the policy recommendations for future exercises. These address the gaps identified from existing stress tests towards the effective prudential supervision of UK financial services, based on each scenario category, for improvements and advances to practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Stavros Pantos, 2025. "“Feeling Stressed?” A Critical Analysis of the Regulatory Prescribed Stress Tests for Financial Services in the UK," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-40, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:246-:d:1648008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/246/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/18/5/246/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:246-:d:1648008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.