IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i12p553-d983953.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Intellectual Capital and Ownership Structure on Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Znar Ahmed

    (Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA-UUM), Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Muhammad Rosni Amir Hussin

    (Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA-UUM), Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

  • Kashan Pirzada

    (Tunku Puteri Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy (TISSA-UUM), Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM), Sintok 06010, Kedah, Malaysia)

Abstract

Even though several studies have been done on intellectual capital, ownership structure, and firm performance, their status has remained uncertain in developing countries like Malaysia. Prior studies have generally focused on a single industry and overlooked the input of all Malaysian non-financial firms. This study investigates the impact of intellectual capital, its components, and ownership structure on firm performance. This study employs a balanced panel data examination for the data of 409 non-financial firms from 11 sectors listed on Bursa, Malaysia for five years (2016–2020). The modified value-added intellectual coefficient model was applied to examine the effect of IC efficiency on firm performance. The empirical findings revealed that IC efficiency, human capital efficiency, structural capital efficiency, capital employed efficiency, and relational capital efficiency are positively and significantly related to firm performance. However, physical and structural capital is the most substantial element of intellectual capital efficiency in augmenting profitability. In addition, government and foreign ownership positively affect firm performance. The research will help managers, policymakers, and investors understand how IC investments increase performance and make prudent investment choices in government and foreign ownership firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Znar Ahmed & Muhammad Rosni Amir Hussin & Kashan Pirzada, 2022. "The Impact of Intellectual Capital and Ownership Structure on Firm Performance," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:553-:d:983953
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/12/553/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/12/553/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dahlquist, Magnus & Robertsson, Goran, 2001. "Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 413-440, March.
    2. Tian, Lihui & Estrin, Saul, 2008. "Retained state shareholding in Chinese PLCs: Does government ownership always reduce corporate value?," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 74-89, March.
    3. Muhammad Nadeem & Christopher Gan & Cuong Nguyen, 2018. "The Importance of Intellectual Capital for Firm Performance: Evidence from Australia," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(3), pages 334-344, September.
    4. Aziz Jaafar & Lynn Hodgkinson & Mao-Feng Kao, 2019. "Ownership Structure, Board of Directors and Firm Performance: Evidence from Taiwan," Working Papers 19011, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    5. Hapsah S. Mohammad & Imbarine Bujang & Taufik Abd. Hakim, 2018. "The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Financial Performance of Malaysian Construction Firms," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8(5), pages 173-186, May.
    6. Siew-Peng Lee & Shaiban Mohammed, 2014. "Intellectual capital on listed agricultural firms' performance in Malaysia," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 202-221.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pearl Abredu & Cai Li & Frank Kofi Essien & Isaiah Agbenu Akanbi Adegoke, 2023. "Unleashing Potential: Overcoming Bottlenecks and Catalyzing Innovations in Intellectual Capital Intellectualization of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in Jiangsu During the Post-Industrial Era," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    2. Monika Barak & Rakesh Kumar Sharma, 2024. "Does intellectual capital impact the financial performance of Indian public sector banks? An empirical analysis using GMM," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    3. Nguyet Thi Nguyen, 2023. "The Impact of Intellectual Capital on Service Firm Financial Performance in Emerging Countries: The Case of Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Vincenzo Scafarto & Tamanna Dalwai & Federica Ricci & Gaetano della Corte, 2023. "Digitalization and Firm Financial Performance in Healthcare: The Mediating Role of Intellectual Capital Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Md. Sohel Rana & Syed Zabid Hossain, 2023. "Intellectual Capital, Firm Performance, and Sustainable Growth: A Study on DSE-Listed Nonfinancial Companies in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stolowy, Hervé & Jeanjean, Thomas & Erkens, Michael, 2011. "The economic consequences of increasing the international visibility of financial reports," HEC Research Papers Series 957, HEC Paris.
    2. Tatiana Dănescu & Ioan-Ovidiu Spătăcean & Maria-Alexandra Popa & Carmen-Gabriela Sîrbu, 2021. "The Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanism over Financial Performance: Evidence from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Hu, Helen Wei & Cui, Lin, 2014. "Outward foreign direct investment of publicly listed firms from China: A corporate governance perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 750-760.
    4. Giannetti, Mariassunta & Simonov, Andrei, 2003. "Which Investors Fear Expropriation? Evidence from Investors' Stock Picking," CEPR Discussion Papers 3843, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Saha Rupjyoti & Kabra Kailash Chandra, 2019. "Does corporate governance influence firm performance? Evidence from India," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(4), pages 70-89, December.
    6. Aishwarya Narayan & Sumukh Hungund, 2022. "Enhancing Firm Performance Through Adoption of Innovation: an Empirical Evidence from Indian Biotechnological Firms," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(3), pages 2431-2456, September.
    7. repec:dau:papers:123456789/9553 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Aggarwal, Reena*Klapper, Leora, 2003. "Ownership structure and initial public offerings," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3103, The World Bank.
    9. Bong‐Chan Kho & René M. Stulz & Francis E. Warnock, 2009. "Financial Globalization, Governance, and the Evolution of the Home Bias," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 597-635, May.
    10. Raddatz, Claudio & Schmukler, Sergio L., 2012. "On the international transmission of shocks: Micro-evidence from mutual fund portfolios," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 357-374.
    11. Kun Wang & Zhe Wei & Xing Xiao & Kunpeng Sun, 2020. "Security regulations, access to capital markets, and firm performance: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7-8), pages 1034-1058, July.
    12. Muhammad Nadeem & Stephen Bahadar & Rashid Zaman & Muhammad Bilal Farooq, 2021. "Does organisational capital influence environmental strategies? Evidence from environmental innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(8), pages 4121-4135, December.
    13. Curcuru, Stephanie E. & Thomas, Charles P. & Warnock, Francis E. & Wongswan, Jon, 2014. "Uncovered Equity Parity and rebalancing in international portfolios," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 86-99.
    14. Garner, Jacqueline L. & Kim, Won Yong, 2013. "Are foreign investors really beneficial? Evidence from South Korea," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 62-84.
    15. Ferreira, Miguel A. & Matos, Pedro, 2008. "The colors of investors' money: The role of institutional investors around the world," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 499-533, June.
    16. Anderson, Christopher W. & Fedenia, Mark & Hirschey, Mark & Skiba, Hilla, 2011. "Cultural influences on home bias and international diversification by institutional investors," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 916-934, April.
    17. Anil Mishra, 2011. "Australia’s equity home bias and real exchange rate volatility," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 223-244, August.
    18. Joel Peress, 2014. "The Media and the Diffusion of Information in Financial Markets: Evidence from Newspaper Strikes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 2007-2043, October.
    19. Kun Wang, 2009. "From State to State: Quasi‐privatization and Firm Performance," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 17(5), pages 52-68, September.
    20. Henrekson, Magnus & Jakobsson, Ulf, 2001. "The Transformation of Ownership Policy and Structure in Sweden: Convergence towards the Anglo-Saxon Model?," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 469, Stockholm School of Economics, revised 19 Sep 2002.
    21. Ling Jin & Jun-Hyeok Choi & Saerona Kim & Dong-Hoon Yang, 2021. "Government Environmental Pressure and Market Response to Carbon Disclosure: A Study of the Early Chinese ETS Implementation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:12:p:553-:d:983953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.