IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p15922-d987845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors That “Nudge People towards the Healthier” Snacks—A Qualitative Study with Student, Faculty, and Staff Leaders and Decision Makers

Author

Listed:
  • Christie Leanne Kirchoff

    (Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Rumi Agarwal

    (FIU Embrace, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Mariana Sanchez

    (Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

  • Cristina Palacios

    (Dietetics and Nutrition, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, USA)

Abstract

(1) College campuses pose numerous public health challenges for students, faculty and staff. The healthfulness of the snacks available on campuses is lacking, and there is a desire for change among the students and staff. The objective of this study is to understand the perspectives of the students, staff, and decision makers regarding the college campus food environment and the perceived facilitators and barriers to improving it. (2) In-depth interviews were conducted ( n = 15) with decision makers in food, policy development, wellness, and nutrition at a large Hispanic-Serving University in South Florida. (3) The key stakeholders shared that educational campaigns, student buy-in, raising awareness around obesity and chronic disease, and the university’s position within the community would all help to facilitate improvements to the snack food environment. However, the participants noted that the complex nature of what is considered to be healthy and what divergent consumers want are significant barriers to improving the snack food environment along with concerns over lost revenue and the corporate structure. (4) These results inform potential focal points for multi-level interventions and inform policy discussions focused on improving the snack food environment at minority-serving universities. Taking strategic actions to improve the snack food environment may aid the students and staff of the university to enhance their diet quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Christie Leanne Kirchoff & Rumi Agarwal & Mariana Sanchez & Cristina Palacios, 2022. "Factors That “Nudge People towards the Healthier” Snacks—A Qualitative Study with Student, Faculty, and Staff Leaders and Decision Makers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15922-:d:987845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15922/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/15922/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Binh Nguyen & Leonie Cranney & Bill Bellew & Margaret Thomas, 2021. "Implementing Food Environment Policies at Scale: What Helps? What Hinders? A Systematic Review of Barriers and Enablers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    2. French, S.A. & Jeffery, R.W. & Story, M. & Breitlow, K.K. & Baxter, J.S. & Hannan, P. & Snyder, M.P., 2001. "Pricing and promotion effects on low-fat vending snack purchases: The CHIPS study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(1), pages 112-117.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chouinard, Hayley H & Davis, David E. & LaFrance, Jeffrey T. & Perloff, Jeffrey M, 2005. "The Effects of a Fat Tax on Dairy Products," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt60t1f3tn, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    2. Cash, Sean B. & Lacanilao, Ryan D., 2007. "Taxing Food to Improve Health: Economic Evidence and Arguments," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(2), pages 174-182, October.
    3. Choi, Seul Ki & Frongillo, Edward A. & Blake, Christine E. & Thrasher, James F., 2019. "Why are restricted food items still sold after the implementation of the school store policy? the case of South Korea," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 161-169.
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:3994 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Le, Ha N.D. & Gold, Lisa & Abbott, Gavin & Crawford, David & McNaughton, Sarah A. & Mhurchu, Cliona Ni & Pollard, Christina & Ball, Kylie, 2016. "Economic evaluation of price discounts and skill-building strategies on purchase and consumption of healthy food and beverages: The SHELf randomized controlled trial," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 83-91.
    6. Monika Hartmann & Gesa Maschkowski, 2009. "Increasing Children’s Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Lessons from advertising
Augmenter la consommation de fruits et légumes des enfants : Leçons tirées de la publicité
Steigerung des Obst," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 8(3), pages 22-28, December.
    7. Urška Rozman & Igor Pravst & Urška Pivk Kupirovič & Urška Blaznik & Primož Kocbek & Sonja Šostar Turk, 2020. "Sweet, Fat and Salty: Snacks in Vending Machines in Health and Social Care Institutions in Slovenia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-12, September.
    8. Nordström, Jonas & Thunström, Linda, 2013. "The Impact of Price Reductions on Individuals' Choice of Healthy Meals Away from Home," Working Papers 2013:21, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    9. Braut, Beatrice & Zaccagni, Sarah, 2023. "Emotional reactions to food interventions: Evidence from an online survey," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(3), pages 419-426.
    10. Zhen Miao & John C. Beghin & Helen H. Jensen, 2013. "Accounting For Product Substitution In The Analysis Of Food Taxes Targeting Obesity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(11), pages 1318-1343, November.
    11. Lin, Biing-Hwan & Dong, Diansheng & Carlson, Andrea & Rahkovsky, Ilya, 2017. "Potential dietary outcomes of changing relative prices of healthy and less healthy foods: The case of ready-to-eat breakfast cereals," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 77-88.
    12. Hartmann, Monika & Cash, Sean B. & Yeh, Ching-Hua & Landwehr, Stefanie C. & McAlister, Anna R., 2016. "Children’s purchase behavior in the snack market: Can branding or low price motivate a healthy choice?," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235841, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Melda Lois Griffiths & Eryl Powell & Lucy Usher & Jacky Boivin & Lewis Bott, 2020. "The health benefits and cost-effectiveness of complete healthy vending," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Lordan Grace & Quiggin John, 2011. "Should We Put a Thin Subsidy on the Policy Table in the Fight against Obesity?," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-13, March.
    15. Mulenga Mary Mukanu & Anne Marie Thow & Peter Delobelle & Zandile June-Rose Mchiza, 2022. "School Food Environment in Urban Zambia: A Qualitative Analysis of Drivers of Adolescent Food Choices and Their Policy Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-18, June.
    16. Papoutsi, Georgia & Nayga, Rodolfo & Lazaridis, Panagiotis & Drichoutis, Andreas, 2013. "Nudging parental health behavior with and without children's pestering power: Fat tax, subsidy or both?," MPRA Paper 52324, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Georgia S. Papoutsi & Andreas C. Drichoutis & Rodolfo M. Nayga Jr., 2013. "The Causes Of Childhood Obesity: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(4), pages 743-767, September.
    18. Livingstone, Sonia & Helsper, Ellen, 2004. "Advertising foods to children: Understanding promotion in the context of children's daily lives. A review of the literature prepared for the Research Department of the Office of Communications (OFCOM)," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 21757, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Naiara Martinez-Perez & Marta Arroyo-Izaga, 2021. "Availability, Nutritional Profile and Processing Level of Food Products Sold in Vending Machines in a Spanish Public University," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, June.
    20. Romana Khan & Kanishka Misra & Vishal Singh, 2016. "Will a Fat Tax Work?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 10-26, January.
    21. Darmon, N. & Lacroix, A. & Muller, L. & Ruffieux, B., 2011. "Experimental economics shows how food price policies may improve diet while increasing socioeconomic inequalities in nutrition," Working Papers 201104, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:15922-:d:987845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.