IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7917-d850336.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Health Risk Perception on Blockchain Traceable Fresh Fruits Purchase Intention in China

Author

Listed:
  • Qianqian Zhai

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China)

  • Ali Sher

    (Business School, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China)

  • Qian Li

    (College of Economics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China)

Abstract

This paper systematically investigates the impact of consumers’ health risk perceptions on the purchase intention of blockchain traceable fresh fruits in China. It uses online-survey data collected from four pilot cities that are part of the food traceability system in China. The ordinary least squares (OLS) and the ordered probit model was applied to examine the posited relationships. The results show that consumers’ health risk perception has a significant positive effect on the purchase intention of blockchain traceable fresh fruits. The stronger consumers’ health risk perception, the stronger their purchase intention of blockchain traceable fresh fruits. Likewise, heterogeneity exists among gender, age, income, and education in their corresponding effect of consumers’ health risk perception on blockchain traceable fresh fruit purchase intention. This suggests that male, high-aged, high-income and high-educated groups have a higher health risk perception, and therefore a higher purchase perception for blockchain traceable fresh fruits than female, low-aged, low-income and low-educated, respectively. Furthermore, family structure, consumers’ traceability cognition and purchase experience of traceable products affect the purchase intention of blockchain traceable fresh fruits. The study has several insights on the broader promotion, acceptance and development of the food traceability system and provides practical cues for policy and practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Qianqian Zhai & Ali Sher & Qian Li, 2022. "The Impact of Health Risk Perception on Blockchain Traceable Fresh Fruits Purchase Intention in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7917-:d:850336
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7917/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7917/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean Spinks & Son Nghiem & Joshua Byrnes, 2021. "Risky business, healthy lives: how risk perception, risk preferences and information influence consumer’s risky health choices," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(5), pages 811-831, July.
    2. Gabriella Dellino & Teresa Laudadio & Renato Mari & Nicola Mastronardi & Carlo Meloni, 2018. "A reliable decision support system for fresh food supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(4), pages 1458-1485, February.
    3. Montecchi, Matteo & Plangger, Kirk & Etter, Michael, 2019. "It’s real, trust me! Establishing supply chain provenance using blockchain," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 283-293.
    4. Lijia Wang & Jianhua Wang & Xuexi Huo, 2019. "Consumer’s Willingness to Pay a Premium for Organic Fruits in China: A Double-Hurdle Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Linjia Xu & Jiaying Liu & Jarim Kim & Myoung-Gi Chon, 2021. "Are Chinese Netizens Willing to Speak Out? The Spiral of Silence in Public Reactions to Controversial Food Safety Issues on Social Media," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Geneci da Silva Ribeiro Rocha & Letícia de Oliveira & Edson Talamini, 2021. "Blockchain Applications in Agribusiness: A Systematic Review," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Yubin Ding & Junling Xu & Sisi Huang & Peipei Li & Cuizhen Lu & Shenghua Xie, 2020. "Risk Perception and Depression in Public Health Crises: Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Xin Lin & Shu-Chen Chang & Tung-Hsiang Chou & Shih-Chih Chen & Athapol Ruangkanjanases, 2021. "Consumers’ Intention to Adopt Blockchain Food Traceability Technology towards Organic Food Products," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-19, January.
    9. Yiqing Su & Hailong Yu & Menglin Wang & Xinqi Li & Yanyan Li, 2022. "Why did China's cost‐reduction‐oriented policies in food safety governance fail? The collective action dilemma perspective," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 70(3), pages 203-217, September.
    10. Wen Lin & David L. Ortega & Danielle Ufer & Vincenzina Caputo & Titus Awokuse, 2022. "Blockchain‐based traceability and demand for U.S. beef in China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 253-272, March.
    11. Jeffrey M Wooldridge, 2010. "Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 2, volume 1, number 0262232588, December.
    12. Aaron M. Shew & Heather A. Snell & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Mary C. Lacity, 2022. "Consumer valuation of blockchain traceability for beef in the United States," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 299-323, March.
    13. Shijiu Yin & Wuyang Hu & Yusheng Chen & Fei Han & Yiqin Wang & Mo Chen, 2019. "Chinese consumer preferences for fresh produce: Interaction between food safety labels and brands," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 53-68, January.
    14. Deepak Prashar & Nishant Jha & Sudan Jha & Yongju Lee & Gyanendra Prasad Joshi, 2020. "Blockchain-Based Traceability and Visibility for Agricultural Products: A Decentralized Way of Ensuring Food Safety in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-20, April.
    15. Hui Liu & Jie Li & Hongyang Li & He Li & Peng Mao & Jingfeng Yuan, 2021. "Risk Perception and Coping Behavior of Construction Workers on Occupational Health Risks—A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-25, July.
    16. Ada Ferrer-i-Carbonell & Paul Frijters, 2004. "How Important is Methodology for the estimates of the determinants of Happiness?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 114(497), pages 641-659, July.
    17. Alba J. Collart & Elizabeth Canales, 2022. "How might broad adoption of blockchain‐based traceability impact the U.S. fresh produce supply chain?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 219-236, March.
    18. Qian Li & Jingjing Wang & Xiaoyang Wang & Yubin Wang, 2020. "The impact of alternative policies on livestock farmers' willingness to recycle manure: evidence from central China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(4), pages 583-594, June.
    19. Jaeyoung Lim & Kuk-Kyoung Moon, 2022. "Does Political Participation Strengthen the Relationship between Civic Morality and Environmentally Friendly Attitudes? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aditi S. Saha & Rakesh D. Raut & Vinay Surendra Yadav & Abhijit Majumdar, 2022. "Blockchain Changing the Outlook of the Sustainable Food Supply Chain to Achieve Net Zero?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    2. Bhuiyan, Muhammad Faress & Ivlevs, Artjoms, 2019. "Micro-entrepreneurship and subjective well-being: Evidence from rural Bangladesh," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 625-645.
    3. Maximilian Riedl & Ingo Geishecker, 2014. "Keep it simple: estimation strategies for ordered response models with fixed effects," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(11), pages 2358-2374, November.
    4. Maite Blázquez & Elena Cottini & Ainhoa Herrarte, 2014. "The socioeconomic gradient in health: how important is material deprivation?," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 12(2), pages 239-264, June.
    5. Pawlowski, Tim & Downward, Paul & Rasciute, Simona, 2014. "Does national pride from international sporting success contribute to well-being? An international investigation," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 121-132.
    6. Francesco Bartolucci & Aleksandra Baschina & Giovanni S. F. Bruno & Olga Demidova & Marcello Signorelli, 2015. "Determinants of Job Satisfaction in Young Russian Workers," Discussion Papers 7_2015, CRISEI, University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    7. Martin Berlin & Niklas Kaunitz, 2015. "Beyond Income: The Importance for Life Satisfaction of Having Access to a Cash Margin," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 16(6), pages 1557-1573, December.
    8. Nguyen, Ha & Duncan, Alan, 2015. "Macroeconomic fluctuations in home countries and immigrants’ well-being: New evidence from Down Under," MPRA Paper 69593, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Feb 2016.
    9. Andree Ehlert & Jan Seidel & Ursula Weisenfeld, 2020. "Trouble on my mind: the effect of catastrophic events on people’s worries," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 951-975, August.
    10. Paul Downward & Peter Dawson, 2016. "Is it Pleasure or Health from Leisure that We Benefit from Most? An Analysis of Well-Being Alternatives and Implications for Policy," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 443-465, March.
    11. Sean Urwin & Thomas Mason & William Whittaker, 2021. "Do different means of recording sexual orientation affect its relationship with health and wellbeing?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(12), pages 3106-3122, December.
    12. Moreno Baruffini & Federica Origo, 2014. "Job satisfaction and flexicurity over the business cycle: evidence from Swiss individual-level data," ERSA conference papers ersa14p366, European Regional Science Association.
    13. Ekaterina Oparina & Caspar Kaiser & Niccolo Gentile & Alexandre Tkatchenko & Andrew E. Clark & Jan-Emmanuel De Neve & Conchita D'Ambrosio, 2022. "Human wellbeing and machine learning," CEP Discussion Papers dp1863, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    14. Kaiser, Caspar, 2018. "People do not adapt to income changes: A re-evaluation of the dynamic effects of (reference) income on life satisfaction with GSOEP and UKHLS data," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-07, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    15. Haiyang Lu & Peishan Tong & Rong Zhu, 2020. "Longitudinal Evidence on Social Trust and Happiness in China: Causal Effects and Mechanisms," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1841-1858, June.
    16. Malgorzata Switek, 2016. "Internal Migration and Life Satisfaction: Well-Being Paths of Young Adult Migrants," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 191-241, January.
    17. John Roy & Stefanie Schurer, 2013. "Getting Stuck In The Blues: Persistence Of Mental Health Problems In Australia," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(9), pages 1139-1157, September.
    18. Sebastian Himmler & Job Exel & Werner Brouwer, 2020. "Estimating the monetary value of health and capability well-being applying the well-being valuation approach," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(8), pages 1235-1244, November.
    19. Matthieu Crozet & Laura Hering & Sandra Poncet, 2018. "Looking for the Bright Side of the China Syndrome: Rising Export Opportunities and Life Satisfaction in China," Working Papers 2018-14, CEPII research center.
    20. Martin Biewen & Andos Juhasz, 2017. "Direct Estimation of Equivalence Scales and More Evidence on Independence of Base," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(5), pages 875-905, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7917-:d:850336. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.