IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i13p7738-d846668.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Sink Cost and Influence Factors Analysis in a National Afforestation Project under Different Investment Modes

Author

Listed:
  • Xuexiang Li

    (School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Research Center for China Agriculture Carbon Emission Reduction and Carbon Trading, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Wanlin Hu

    (College of Economics & Management, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)

  • Fan Zhang

    (School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100091, China)

  • Jinxin Zhang

    (School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Research Center for China Agriculture Carbon Emission Reduction and Carbon Trading, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Feng Sheng

    (Research Center for China Agriculture Carbon Emission Reduction and Carbon Trading, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis & Enzyme Engineering, College of Life Science, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Xiangyu Xu

    (Institute of Plant Protection and Soil Fertilizer, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China)

Abstract

Afforestation projects are the main source of carbon sink. Measurement and impact analysis of carbon sink costs will help accelerate the marketization of forestry carbon sink. Considering the opportunity cost of land use and the carbon release cost of wood products, this study proposed a forestry carbon sink cost model under the Public–Private Partnership (PPP) and the direct (DI) investment mode based on the classic carbon sink model. Then, the proposed models were applied to a real-world afforestation project, the 20-year national afforestation project (NAP) in Laohekou City, Hubei Province, China. With the help of the input–output forestry carbon sink cost–benefit analysis framework, the dynamic analysis of factors such as rotation period, timber price, discount rate and yield rate for forestry is carried out. Results show that: (1) with the increasing of rotation period, wood market price, and wood yield rate, the carbon sink cost of Laohekou NAP gradually decreases, while the discount rate has the opposite trend; (2) the DI mode is more feasible than the PPP model at the present condition. The PPP mode is more feasible than the DI mode only when the wood price is lower than 73.18% of the current price, the yield rate is lower than 0.485, and the discount rate is higher than 6.77%. (3) When choosing tree species for NAP, the carbon sink capacity, wood market price, maturity time, and planting cost should be synthetically considered. The proposed model and the obtained results can not only support local governments and forestry carbon sink enterprises to make tradeoffs between PPP and DI mode, but also provide them with useful information for reducing carbon sink costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuexiang Li & Wanlin Hu & Fan Zhang & Jinxin Zhang & Feng Sheng & Xiangyu Xu, 2022. "Carbon Sink Cost and Influence Factors Analysis in a National Afforestation Project under Different Investment Modes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-15, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7738-:d:846668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7738/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/13/7738/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang DONG & Gaoyi MIAO & Weigang WEN, 2021. "China’s Carbon Neutrality Policy: Objectives, Impacts and Paths," East Asian Policy (EAP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(01), pages 5-18, January.
    2. Ying CAO & Xiaomei Li & Haoben YAN & Shuya KUANG, 2021. "China’s Efforts to Peak Carbon Emissions: Targets and Practice," Chinese Journal of Urban and Environmental Studies (CJUES), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(01), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Coleman, Andrew, 2018. "Forest-based carbon sequestration, and the role of forward, futures, and carbon-lending markets: A comparative institutions approach," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 95-104.
    4. van Kooten, G. Cornelis & Sohngen, Brent, 2007. "Economics of Forest Ecosystem Carbon Sinks: A Review," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 1(3), pages 237-269, September.
    5. Lin, Boqiang & Sun, Chuanwang, 2010. "Evaluating carbon dioxide emissions in international trade of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 613-621, January.
    6. Chen, Ping-Yu & Chen, Bo-Yu & Tsai, Pei-Hui & Chen, Chi-Chung, 2015. "Evaluating the impacts of a carbon tax on imported forest products—evidence from Taiwan," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 45-52.
    7. Karl-Heinz Erb & Thomas Kastner & Sebastiaan Luyssaert & Richard A. Houghton & Tobias Kuemmerle & Pontus Olofsson & Helmut Haberl, 2013. "Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 854-856, October.
    8. Haight, Robert G. & Bluffstone, Randall & Kline, Jeffrey D. & Coulston, John W. & Wear, David N. & Zook, Kate, 2020. "Estimating the Present Value of Carbon Sequestration in U.S. Forests, 2015–2050, for Evaluating Federal Climate Change Mitigation Policies," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(1), pages 150-177, April.
    9. Guo, Jinggang & Gong, Peichen, 2017. "The potential and cost of increasing forest carbon sequestration in Sweden," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(PB), pages 78-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongyi Liu & Tianyu He, 2023. "Sustainable Management of Land Resources: The Case of China’s Forestry Carbon Sink Mechanism," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-18, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monge, Juan J. & Bryant, Henry L. & Gan, Jianbang & Richardson, James W., 2016. "Land use and general equilibrium implications of a forest-based carbon sequestration policy in the United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 102-120.
    2. Poudyal, Neelam C. & Siry, Jacek P. & Bowker, J.M., 2010. "Urban forests' potential to supply marketable carbon emission offsets: A survey of municipal governments in the United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(6), pages 432-438, July.
    3. Boglioni, Michele & Zambelli, Stefano, 2018. "Specialization patterns and reduction of CO2 emissions. An empirical investigation of environmental preservation and economic efficiency," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 134-149.
    4. Congxin Li & Xu Zhang, 2022. "The Influencing Mechanisms on Global Industrial Value Chains Embedded in Trade Implied Carbon Emissions from a Higher-Order Networks Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-38, November.
    5. Gregmar Galinato & Shinsuke Uchida, 2010. "Evaluating Temporary Certified Emission Reductions in Reforestation and Afforestation Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 46(1), pages 111-133, May.
    6. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-Ming & Guo, Haixiang & Ding, Liping, 2014. "Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 290-300.
    7. Ming-Yun Chu & Wan-Yu Liu, 2021. "Assessing the Opportunity Cost of Carbon Stock Caused by Land-Use Changes in Taiwan," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Chen, G.Q. & Chen, Z.M., 2011. "Greenhouse gas emissions and natural resources use by the world economy: Ecological input–output modeling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(14), pages 2362-2376.
    9. Nijnik, Maria & Pajot, Guillaume & Moffat, Andy J. & Slee, Bill, 2013. "An economic analysis of the establishment of forest plantations in the United Kingdom to mitigate climatic change," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 34-42.
    10. van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2008. "Biological Carbon Sequestration and Carbon Trading Re-Visited," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44262, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Liu, Ying & Jayanthakumaran, Kankesu & Neri, Frank, 2013. "Who is responsible for the CO2 emissions that China produces?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1412-1419.
    12. Nelly Exbrayat & Stéphane Riou & Skerdilajda Zanaj, 2015. "Carbon tax, pollution and the spatial location of heterogeneous firms," Post-Print halshs-01211431, HAL.
    13. Zhu, Zhi-Shuang & Liao, Hua & Cao, Huai-Shu & Wang, Lu & Wei, Yi-Ming & Yan, Jinyue, 2014. "The differences of carbon intensity reduction rate across 89 countries in recent three decades," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 808-815.
    14. Ji, Xi & Liu, Yifang & Wu, Guowei & Su, Pinyi & Ye, Zhen & Feng, Kuishuang, 2022. "Global value chain participation and trade-induced energy inequality," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Xiao, Hao & Sun, Ke-Juan & Bi, Hui-Min & Xue, Jin-Jun, 2019. "Changes in carbon intensity globally and in countries: Attribution and decomposition analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1492-1504.
    16. Zhong, Zhangqi & Jiang, Lei & Zhou, Peng, 2018. "Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 858-875.
    17. Zhou, Dequn & Zhou, Xiaoyong & Xu, Qing & Wu, Fei & Wang, Qunwei & Zha, Donglan, 2018. "Regional embodied carbon emissions and their transfer characteristics in China," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 180-193.
    18. Chen, G.Q. & Zhang, Bo, 2010. "Greenhouse gas emissions in China 2007: Inventory and input-output analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6180-6193, October.
    19. Duan, Yuwan & Yan, Bingqian, 2019. "Economic gains and environmental losses from international trade: A decomposition of pollution intensity in China's value-added trade," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 540-554.
    20. Chao-Qun Ma & Jiang-Long Liu & Yi-Shuai Ren & Yong Jiang, 2019. "The Impact of Economic Growth, FDI and Energy Intensity on China’s Manufacturing Industry’s CO 2 Emissions: An Empirical Study Based on the Fixed-Effect Panel Quantile Regression Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:13:p:7738-:d:846668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.