IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2019i1p178-d302111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving People’s Self-Reported Experience with the Health Services: The Role of Non-Clinical Factors

Author

Listed:
  • Ángel Fernández-Pérez

    (Department of Applied Economics, University of Granada (Spain), Faculty of Economics and Business Science, Campus Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Ángeles Sánchez

    (Department of Applied Economics, University of Granada (Spain), Faculty of Economics and Business Science, Campus Cartuja s/n, 18071 Granada, Spain)

Abstract

The main aim of this study was to analyse the association between non-clinical factors and the self-reported experience of people with the main health services of the Spanish public healthcare system. Specifically, we analysed whether factors such as the treatment received from health staff, the confidence transmitted to the patient by the doctor, or waiting time for a diagnostic test had an influence on people reporting a more satisfactory experience with primary, specialised, and hospital care services. We used cross-sectional microdata from the Spanish Healthcare Barometer survey of 2015 comprising a sample of 7800 individuals. We applied a probit-adapted ordinary least squares estimation, which is one of the most widely used methods in recent studies on subjective well-being. Our findings suggest that individuals’ interaction with non-clinical factors was positively correlated with the overall health services experience. Treatment received from health staff was one of the most relevant factors to ensure that individuals report a more satisfactory experience with primary care. Time devoted by physicians to each patient and waiting time for a non-emergency admission were the most correlated factors in specialised and hospital care services, respectively. This study could have implications for public policies. First, it shows policy-makers the influence of non-clinical factors when individuals rate their overall experience with the main health services in Spain. Second, it identifies the key factors where the health system could reallocate more public resources to improve people’s experience and thus the health system responsiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ángel Fernández-Pérez & Ángeles Sánchez, 2019. "Improving People’s Self-Reported Experience with the Health Services: The Role of Non-Clinical Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:178-:d:302111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/178/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/178/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin P. Green & John S. Heywood, 2015. "Dissatisfied Union Workers: Sorting Revisited," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 53(3), pages 580-600, September.
    2. Röttger, Julia & Blümel, Miriam & Linder, Roland & Busse, Reinhard, 2017. "Health system responsiveness and chronic disease care – What is the role of disease management programs? An analysis based on cross-sectional survey and administrative claims data," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 54-62.
    3. Gianluca Fiorentini & Silvana Robone & Rossella Verzulli, 2018. "How do hospital‐specialty characteristics influence health system responsiveness? An empirical evaluation of in‐patient care in the Italian region of Emilia‐Romagna," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(2), pages 266-281, February.
    4. Ali, Faleh Mohamed Hussain & Nikoloski, Zlatko & Reka, Husein, 2015. "Satisfaction and responsiveness with health-care services in Qatar—evidence from a survey," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(11), pages 1499-1505.
    5. Fiorentini, Gianluca & Ragazzi, Giovanni & Robone, Silvana, 2015. "Are bad health and pain making us grumpy? An empirical evaluation of reporting heterogeneity in rating health system responsiveness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 48-58.
    6. Wenhua Wang & Elizabeth Maitland & Stephen Nicholas & Jeannie Haggerty, 2019. "Determinants of Overall Satisfaction with Public Clinics in Rural China: Interpersonal Care Quality and Treatment Outcome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, February.
    7. Park, Kisoo & Park, Jumin & Kwon, Young Dae & Kang, Yoonjeong & Noh, Jin-Won, 2016. "Public satisfaction with the healthcare system performance in South Korea: Universal healthcare system," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(6), pages 621-629.
    8. Néstor Gandelman & Giorgina Piani & Zuleika Ferre, 2012. "Neighborhood Determinants of Quality of Life," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 547-563, June.
    9. Abid Hussain & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Sardar Muhammad Usman & Jinsoo Hwang & Yushi Jiang & Awaisra Shafiq, 2019. "What Factors Affect Patient Satisfaction in Public Sector Hospitals: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    10. María Navarro & Wiemer Salverda, 2019. "Earner Position and Job and Life Satisfaction: Do Contributions to the Household Income have the Same Effect by Gender and Occupations?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(7), pages 2227-2250, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. García-Corchero, Juan David & Jiménez-Rubio, Dolores, 2022. "How do policy levers shape the quality of a national health system?," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 203-221.
    2. Schneider, Simone M. & Popic, Tamara, 2018. "Cognitive determinants of healthcare evaluations – A comparison of Eastern and Western European countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 269-278.
    3. Anna Fabry & Goedele Broeck & Miet Maertens, 2022. "Gender Inequality and Job Satisfaction in Senegal: A Multiple Mediation Model," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 2291-2311, June.
    4. Alex Bryson & Lucy Stokes & David Wilkinson, 2023. "Is pupil attainment higher in well-managed schools?," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 129-144, January.
    5. Artz, Benjamin & Blanchflower, David G. & Bryson, Alex, 2022. "Unions increase job satisfaction in the United States," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 173-188.
    6. Noelia Somarriba Arechavala & Pilar Zarzosa Espina & Ana Teresa López Pastor, 2022. "The Importance of the Neighbourhood Environment and Social Capital for Happiness in a Vulnerable District: The Case of the Pajarillos District in Spain," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 1941-1965, June.
    7. Heiko Rüger & Stefanie Hoherz & Norbert F. Schneider & Herbert Fliege & Maria M. Bellinger & Brenton M. Wiernik, 2023. "The Effects of Urban Living Conditions on Subjective Well-Being: The Case of German Foreign Service Employees," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 18(4), pages 1939-1963, August.
    8. Welsch, Heinz & Ferreira, Susana, 2014. "Environment, Well-Being, and Experienced Preference," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 7(3-4), pages 205-239, December.
    9. Bryson, Alex & Clark, Andrew E. & Freeman, Richard B. & Green, Colin P., 2016. "Share capitalism and worker wellbeing," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 151-158.
    10. Abid Hussain & Muhammad Asif & Arif Jameel & Jinsoo Hwang, 2019. "Measuring OPD Patient Satisfaction with Different Service Delivery Aspects at Public Hospitals in Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-9, July.
    11. Gustavo Ahumada & Victor Iturra & Mauricio Sarrias, 2020. "We Do Not Have the Same Tastes! Evaluating Individual Heterogeneity in the Preferences for Amenities," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 53-74, January.
    12. Iwona Malinowska-Lipień & Agnieszka Micek & Teresa Gabryś & Maria Kózka & Krzysztof Gajda & Agnieszka Gniadek & Tomasz Brzostek & Jason Fletcher & Allison Squires, 2021. "Impact of the Work Environment on Patients’ Safety as Perceived by Nurses in Poland—A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-14, November.
    13. Shelley White-Means & Darrell J. Gaskin & Ahmad Reshad Osmani, 2019. "Intervention and Public Policy Pathways to Achieve Health Care Equity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-11, July.
    14. White, Michael & Bryson, Alex, 2018. "HPWS in the Public Sector: Are There Mutual Gains?," IZA Discussion Papers 11965, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    15. Zongfeng Sun & Jintao Li, 2020. "The Effects of Performance of Public Sector Health System on Quality of Life in China: Evidence from the CGSS2015," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.
    16. María Laura Arrosa & Nestor Gandelman, 2016. "Valuation of public amenities and differences in quality of life among Latin American cities," Documentos de Investigación 111, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    17. Stefanie Hoherz & Mark Bryan, 2020. "Provider or Father? British Men’s Work Hours and Work Hour Preferences after the Birth of a Child," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(2), pages 193-210, April.
    18. María Navarro, 2019. "Financial, Job and Health Satisfaction: A Comparative Approach on Working People," Societies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, April.
    19. David G. Blanchflower & Alex Bryson, 2020. "Now Unions Increase Job Satisfaction and Well-being," NBER Working Papers 27720, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Silva, Wesley Mendes da & Onusic, Luciana Massaro & Norvilitis, Jill M. & Moura, Gilnei L., 2013. "Ilusão de foco e satisfação com a vida entre universitários em São Paulo e Santa Maria," RAE - Revista de Administração de Empresas, FGV-EAESP Escola de Administração de Empresas de São Paulo (Brazil), vol. 53(5), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:178-:d:302111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.