IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i19p3565-d270145.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intersections and Non-Intersections: A Protocol for Identifying Pedestrian Crash Risk Locations in GIS

Author

Listed:
  • Mingyu Kang

    (Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements (KRIHS), Sejong-si 30147, Korea)

  • Anne Vernez Moudon

    (Urban Form Lab and Department of Urban Design and Planning, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Haena Kim

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

  • Linda Ng Boyle

    (Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA)

Abstract

Intersection and non-intersection locations are commonly used as spatial units of analysis for modeling pedestrian crashes. While both location types have been previously studied, comparing results is difficult given the different data and methods used to identify crash-risk locations. In this study, a systematic and replicable protocol was developed in GIS (Geographic Information System) to create a consistent spatial unit of analysis for use in pedestrian crash modelling. Four publicly accessible datasets were used to identify unique intersection and non-intersection locations: Roadway intersection points, roadway lanes, legal speed limits, and pedestrian crash records. Two algorithms were developed and tested using five search radii (ranging from 20 to 100 m) to assess the protocol reliability. The algorithms, which were designed to identify crash-risk locations at intersection and non-intersection areas detected 87.2% of the pedestrian crash locations (r: 20 m). Agreement rates between algorithm results and the crash data were 94.1% for intersection and 98.0% for non-intersection locations, respectively. The buffer size of 20 m generally showed the highest performance in the analyses. The present protocol offered an efficient and reliable method to create spatial analysis units for pedestrian crash modeling. It provided researchers a cost-effective method to identify unique intersection and non-intersection locations. Additional search radii should be tested in future studies to refine the capture of crash-risk locations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingyu Kang & Anne Vernez Moudon & Haena Kim & Linda Ng Boyle, 2019. "Intersections and Non-Intersections: A Protocol for Identifying Pedestrian Crash Risk Locations in GIS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-14, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3565-:d:270145
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3565/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/19/3565/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ke Nie & Zhensheng Wang & Qingyun Du & Fu Ren & Qin Tian, 2015. "A Network-Constrained Integrated Method for Detecting Spatial Cluster and Risk Location of Traffic Crash: A Case Study from Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, March.
    2. Schneider, Robert J. & Diogenes, Mara Chagas & Arnold, Lindsay S. & Attaset, Vanvisa & Griswold, Julia & Ragland, David R, 2010. "Association between Roadway Intersection Characteristics and Pedestrian Crash Risk in Alameda County, California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt0d48w4gz, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. Song, J.J. & Ghosh, M. & Miaou, S. & Mallick, B., 2006. "Bayesian multivariate spatial models for roadway traffic crash mapping," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 246-273, January.
    4. Pucher, J. & Dijkstra, L., 2003. "Promoting Safe Walking and Cycling to Improve Public Health: Lessons from The Netherlands and Germany," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1509-1516.
    5. Millward, Hugh & Spinney, Jamie & Scott, Darren, 2013. "Active-transport walking behavior: destinations, durations, distances," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 101-110.
    6. Chia-Yuan Yu, 2015. "How Differences in Roadways Affect School Travel Safety," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 81(3), pages 203-220, July.
    7. Kun Xie & Kaan Ozbay & Abdullah Kurkcu & Hong Yang, 2017. "Analysis of Traffic Crashes Involving Pedestrians Using Big Data: Investigation of Contributing Factors and Identification of Hotspots," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1459-1476, August.
    8. Lu Ma & Xuedong Yan & Wenxin Qiao, 2014. "A Quasi-Poisson Approach on Modeling Accident Hazard Index for Urban Road Segments," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2014, pages 1-8, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neatt, Kevin & Millward, Hugh & Spinney, Jamie, 2017. "Neighborhood walking densities: A multivariate analysis in Halifax, Canada," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 9-16.
    2. Rashidi, Eghbal & Parsafard, Mohsen & Medal, Hugh & Li, Xiaopeng, 2016. "Optimal traffic calming: A mixed-integer bi-level programming model for locating sidewalks and crosswalks in a multimodal transportation network to maximize pedestrians’ safety and network usability," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 33-50.
    3. Hwayoung Kim & Jungyeon Choi & Yunwoo Nam & Jong-Hoon Youn, 2022. "Characteristic Analysis of the Built Environment of Ferry Terminals: A Case Study of Mokpo, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Nabipour, Mohammad & Rosenberg, Mark W. & Nasseri, Seyed Hadi, 2022. "The built environment, networks design, and safety features: An analysis of pedestrian commuting behavior in intermediate-sized cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 14-23.
    5. Robert J.R. Elliott & Viet Nguyen-Tien & Eric Strobl & Chengyu Zhang, 2024. "Estimating the longevity of electric vehicles: What do 300 million MOT test results tell us?," CEP Discussion Papers dp1972, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Ellison, Richard B. & Ellison, Adrian B. & Greaves, Stephen P. & Sampaio, Breno, 2017. "Electronic ticketing systems as a mechanism for travel behaviour change? Evidence from Sydney’s Opal card," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 80-93.
    7. Spielman, Seth E. & Yoo, Eun-hye, 2009. "The spatial dimensions of neighborhood effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1098-1105, March.
    8. Vandenbulcke, Grégory & Dujardin, Claire & Thomas, Isabelle & Geus, Bas de & Degraeuwe, Bart & Meeusen, Romain & Panis, Luc Int, 2011. "Cycle commuting in Belgium: Spatial determinants and 're-cycling' strategies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 118-137, February.
    9. Eric T. H. Chan & Tim Schwanen & David Banister, 2021. "The role of perceived environment, neighbourhood characteristics, and attitudes in walking behaviour: evidence from a rapidly developing city in China," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(1), pages 431-454, February.
    10. Paul Downward & Simona Rasciute, 2011. "An Economic Analysis of the Subjective Health and Well-being of Physical Activity," Chapters, in: Plácido Rodríguez & Stefan Késenne & Brad R. Humphreys (ed.), The Economics of Sport, Health and Happiness, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Ryus, Paul & Ferguson, Erin & Laustsen, Kelly M. & Schneider, Robert J. & Proulx, Frank R. & Hull, Tony & Miranda-Moreno, Luis, 2014. "Guidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt11q5p33w, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    12. Thomas M. Koutsos & Georgios C. Menexes & Andreas P. Mamolos, 2021. "The Use of Crop Yield Autocorrelation Data as a Sustainable Approach to Adjust Agronomic Inputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Daley, Michelle & Rissel, Chris, 2011. "Perspectives and images of cycling as a barrier or facilitator of cycling," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 211-216, January.
    14. Yaxin Fan & Xinyan Zhu & Bing She & Wei Guo & Tao Guo, 2018. "Network-constrained spatio-temporal clustering analysis of traffic collisions in Jianghan District of Wuhan, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    15. O'Driscoll, Conor & Crowley, Frank & Doran, Justin & McCarthy, Nóirín, 2022. "Retail sprawl and CO2 emissions: Retail centres in Irish cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    16. Lord, Dominique & Mannering, Fred, 2010. "The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 291-305, June.
    17. Li, Aoyong & Huang, Yizhe & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "An approach to imputing destination activities for inclusion in measures of bicycle accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. McDonald, Noreen C., 2005. "Children’s Travel: Patterns and Influences," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt51c9m01c, University of California Transportation Center.
    19. Paul Czioska & Ronny Kutadinata & Aleksandar Trifunović & Stephan Winter & Monika Sester & Bernhard Friedrich, 2019. "Real-world meeting points for shared demand-responsive transportation systems," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 341-377, August.
    20. Gao, Jingqin & Zuo, Fan & Ozbay, Kaan & Hammami, Omar & Barlas, Murat Ledin, 2022. "A new curb lane monitoring and illegal parking impact estimation approach based on queueing theory and computer vision for cameras with low resolution and low frame rate," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 137-154.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:19:p:3565-:d:270145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.