IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i18p3342-d265993.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exerting Explanatory Accounts of Safety Behavior of Older Construction Workers within the Theory of Planned Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Peng

    (Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China)

  • Alan H.S. Chan

    (Department of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon 999077, Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Older construction workers are vulnerable to accident risks at work. Work behavior affects the occurrence of accidents at construction sites. This study aims to investigate the organizational and personal factors that underlie the safety behaviors of older construction workers considering their age-related characteristics. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey, which involves 260 older construction workers (aged 50 and over), was conducted, and an integrative old-construction-worker safety behavior model (OSBM) was established on the basis of the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Results showed that the OSBM provides a considerably good explanation of the safety behaviors of older construction workers. The explained variances for safety participation and compliance are 74.2% and 63.1%, respectively. Subjective norms and perceived behavioral control are two critical psychological drivers that proximally affect the safety behaviors of workers. Moreover, safety knowledge, management commitment, and aging expectation are the distal antecedents that significantly influence psychological drivers. This study proves the mediating role of psychological factors on predicting safety behaviors among older construction workers, thereby promoting an understanding of “how” and “why” their safety behaviors occur. Furthermore, the identified effects of several critical organizational and personal factors, particularly age-related factors, provide new insights into the safety behaviors of older construction workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Peng & Alan H.S. Chan, 2019. "Exerting Explanatory Accounts of Safety Behavior of Older Construction Workers within the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3342-:d:265993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3342/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/18/3342/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    2. Burke, M.J. & Sarpy, S.A. & Smith-Crowe, K. & Chan-Serafin, S. & Salvador, R.O. & Islam, G., 2006. "Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(2), pages 315-324.
    3. Banus Kam Leung Low & Siu Shing Man & Alan Hoi Shou Chan, 2018. "The Risk-Taking Propensity of Construction Workers—An Application of Quasi-Expert Interview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-11, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huaiyuan Zhai & Mengjie Li & Shengyue Hao & Mingli Chen & Lingchen Kong, 2021. "How Does Metro Maintenance Staff’s Risk Perception Influence Safety Citizenship Behavior—The Mediating Role of Safety Attitude," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Li Yang & Sumaiya Bashiru Danwana & Fadilul-lah Yassaanah Issahaku & Sundas Matloob & Junqi Zhu, 2022. "Investigating the Effects of Personality on the Safety Behavior of Gold Mine Workers: A Moderated Mediation Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Marchel Bentoy & Marlon Mata & Jayson Bayogo & Roel Vasquez & Rose Mary Almacen & Samantha Shane Evangelista & Charldy Wenceslao & Jannen Batoon & Maria Diana Lauro & Kafferine Yamagishi & Gamaliel Go, 2022. "Complex Cause-Effect Relationships of Social Capital, Leader-Member Exchange, and Safety Behavior of Workers in Small-Medium Construction Firms and the Moderating Role of Age," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Guodong Ni & Yuanyuan Zhu & Ziyao Zhang & Yaning Qiao & Huaikun Li & Na Xu & Yongliang Deng & Zhenmin Yuan & Wenshun Wang, 2020. "Influencing Mechanism of Job Satisfaction on Safety Behavior of New Generation of Construction Workers Based on Chinese Context: The Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Safety Knowledge Sharing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-24, November.
    5. Greta Mazzetti & Emanuela Valente & Dina Guglielmi & Michela Vignoli, 2020. "Safety Doesn’t Happen by Accident: A Longitudinal Investigation on the Antecedents of Safety Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    6. Xiangcheng Meng & Alan H. S. Chan, 2022. "Cross-Regional Research in Demographic Impact on Safety Consciousness and Safety Citizenship Behavior of Construction Workers: A Comparative Study between Mainland China and Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Junjie Zhang & Huaiyuan Zhai & Xiangcheng Meng & Wanxue Wang & Lei Zhou, 2020. "Influence of Social Safety Capital on Safety Citizenship Behavior: The Mediation of Autonomous Safety Motivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Krzysztof Nowacki, 2021. "Accident Risk in the Production Sector of EU Countries—Cohort Studies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Xun Liu & Zhiyuan Xue & Zhenhan Ding & Siyu Chen, 2023. "Current Status and Future Directions of Construction Safety Climate: Visual Analysis Based on WOS Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Man Zhou & Xiancong Chen & Lei He & Franck Aristide Kiswendsida Ouedraogo, 2022. "Dual-Attitude Decision-Making Processes of Construction Worker Safety Behaviors: A Simulation-Based Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Mengjie Li & Huaiyuan Zhai & Junjie Zhang & Xiangcheng Meng, 2020. "Research on the Relationship Between Safety Leadership, Safety Attitude and Safety Citizenship Behavior of Railway Employees," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Xun Liu & Dexin Liu & Mengyu Xu, 2023. "An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to Explain General Contractors’ Long-Term Cooperation Intentions in Construction Projects: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gui Ye & Hongzhe Yue & Jingjing Yang & Hongyang Li & Qingting Xiang & Yuan Fu & Can Cui, 2020. "Understanding the Sociocognitive Process of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, March.
    2. Greta Mazzetti & Emanuela Valente & Dina Guglielmi & Michela Vignoli, 2020. "Safety Doesn’t Happen by Accident: A Longitudinal Investigation on the Antecedents of Safety Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Yaoshan Xu & Yongjuan Li & Weidong Ding & Fan Lu, 2014. "Controlled versus Automatic Processes: Which Is Dominant to Safety? The Moderating Effect of Inhibitory Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
    4. Maria Andersson & Ola Eriksson & Chris Von Borgstede, 2012. "The Effects of Environmental Management Systems on Source Separation in the Work and Home Settings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-17, June.
    5. Tran Huy Phuong & Thanh Trung Hieu, 2015. "Predictors of Entrepreneurial Intentions of Undergraduate Students in Vietnam: An Empirical Study," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(8), pages 46-55, August.
    6. Clara Cardone-Riportella & María José Casasola-Martinez & Isabel Feito-Ruiz, 2014. "Do Entrepreneurs Come From Venus Or Mars? Impact Of Postgraduate Studies: Gender And Family Business Background," Working Papers 14.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Financial Economics and Accounting (former Department of Business Administration), revised Sep 2014.
    7. Peng Cheng & Zhe Ouyang & Yang Liu, 0. "The effect of information overload on the intention of consumers to adopt electric vehicles," Transportation, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-20.
    8. Ruijie Zhu & Guojing Zhao & Zehai Long & Yangjie Huang & Zhaoxin Huang, 2022. "Entrepreneurship or Employment? A Survey of College Students’ Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Alsalem, Amani & Fry, Marie-Louise & Thaichon, Park, 2020. "To donate or to waste it: Understanding posthumous organ donation attitude," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 87-97.
    10. Pan, Jing Yu & Liu, Dahai, 2022. "Mask-wearing intentions on airplanes during COVID-19 – Application of theory of planned behavior model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 32-44.
    11. Benoît Lécureux & Adrien Bonnet & Ouassim Manout & Jaâfar Berrada & Louafi Bouzouina, 2022. "Acceptance of Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Literature Review of stated choice experiments," Working Papers hal-03814947, HAL.
    12. Jacqueline Ruth & Steffen Willwacher & Oliver Korn, 2022. "Acceptance of Digital Sports: A Study Showing the Rising Acceptance of Digital Health Activities Due to the SARS-CoV-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Jariyasunant, Jerald & Carrel, Andre & Ekambaram, Venkatesan & Gaker, David & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan L., 2012. "The Quantified Traveler: Changing transport behavior with personalized travel data feedback," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3047k0dw, University of California Transportation Center.
    14. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    15. Teodora Roman, 2009. "Study regarding entrepreneurial intentions among students," THE YEARBOOK OF THE "GH. ZANE" INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCHES, Gheorghe Zane Institute for Economic and Social Research ( from THE ROMANIAN ACADEMY, JASSY BRANCH), vol. 18, pages 87-94.
    16. Messele Kumilachew Aga, 2023. "The mediating role of perceived behavioral control in the relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions of university students in Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Kristin Thomas & Evalill Nilsson & Karin Festin & Pontus Henriksson & Mats Lowén & Marie Löf & Margareta Kristenson, 2020. "Associations of Psychosocial Factors with Multiple Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Study of Middle-Aged Men and Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Andreas Falke & Nadine Schröder & Claudia Hofmann, 2022. "The influence of values in sustainable consumption among millennials," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 92(6), pages 899-928, August.
    19. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    20. Ficko, Andrej & Boncina, Andrej, 2013. "Probabilistic typology of management decision making in private forest properties," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 34-43.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:18:p:3342-:d:265993. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.