IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aph/ajpbhl/10.2105-ajph.2004.059840_0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods

Author

Listed:
  • Burke, M.J.
  • Sarpy, S.A.
  • Smith-Crowe, K.
  • Chan-Serafin, S.
  • Salvador, R.O.
  • Islam, G.

Abstract

Objectives. We sought to determine the relative effectiveness of different methods of worker safety and health training aimed at improving safety knowledge and performance and reducing negative outcomes (accidents, illnesses, and injuries). Methods. Ninety-five quasi-experimental studies (n = 20991) were included in the analysis. Three types of intervention methods were distinguished on the basis of learners' participation in the training process: least engaging (lecture, pamphlets, videos), moderately engaging (programmed instruction, feedback interventions), and most engaging (training in behavioral modeling, hands-on training). Results. As training methods became more engaging (i.e., requiring trainees' active participation), workers demonstrated greater knowledge acquisition, and reductions were seen in accidents, illnesses, and injuries. All methods of training produced meaningful behavioral performance improvements. Conclusions. Training involving behavioral modeling, a substantial amount of practice, and dialogue is generally more effective than other methods of safety and health training. The present findings challenge the current emphasis on more passive computer-based and distance training methods within the public health workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Burke, M.J. & Sarpy, S.A. & Smith-Crowe, K. & Chan-Serafin, S. & Salvador, R.O. & Islam, G., 2006. "Relative effectiveness of worker safety and health training methods," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(2), pages 315-324.
  • Handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2004.059840_0
    DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059840
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.2105/AJPH.2004.059840
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2105/AJPH.2004.059840?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li-Ting Yeh, 2017. "Incorporating Workplace Injury to Measure the Safety Performance of Industrial Sectors in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Gui Ye & Hongzhe Yue & Jingjing Yang & Hongyang Li & Qingting Xiang & Yuan Fu & Can Cui, 2020. "Understanding the Sociocognitive Process of Construction Workers’ Unsafe Behaviors: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Arso M. Vukićević & Ivan Mačužić & Marko Djapan & Vladimir Milićević & Luiza Shamina, 2021. "Digital Training and Advanced Learning in Occupational Safety and Health Based on Modern and Affordable Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Lu Peng & Alan H.S. Chan, 2019. "Exerting Explanatory Accounts of Safety Behavior of Older Construction Workers within the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-19, September.
    5. Øyvind Dahl & Torbjørn Rundmo & Espen Olsen, 2022. "The Impact of Business Leaders’ Formal Health and Safety Training on the Establishment of Robust Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems: Three Studies Based on Data from Labour Inspections," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Hui Liu & Jie Li & Hongyang Li & He Li & Peng Mao & Jingfeng Yuan, 2021. "Risk Perception and Coping Behavior of Construction Workers on Occupational Health Risks—A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-25, July.
    7. Ricardo Eiris & Masoud Gheisari & Behzad Esmaeili, 2018. "PARS: Using Augmented 360-Degree Panoramas of Reality for Construction Safety Training," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-21, November.
    8. Pablo Arocena & Imanol Núñez, 2009. "The Effect of Occupational Safety Legislation in Preventing Accidents at Work: Traditional versus Advanced Manufacturing Industries," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(1), pages 159-174, February.
    9. Zheng Xu & Nan Zheng, 2020. "Incorporating Virtual Reality Technology in Safety Training Solution for Construction Site of Urban Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Jose Antonio Diego-Mas & Jorge Alcaide-Marzal & Rocio Poveda-Bautista, 2020. "Effects of Using Immersive Media on the Effectiveness of Training to Prevent Ergonomics Risks," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    11. Joanna Bartnicka & Patrycja Kabiesz & Dorota Palka & Paulina Gajewska & Ejaz Ul Islam & Damian Szymanek, 2021. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Employers and H&S Services in Relation to the COVID-19 System in Polish Manufacturing Companies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Artur Kierzkowski & Jacek Ryczyński & Tomasz Kisiel, 2024. "Method of Reducing Energy Consumption during Forklift Operator Training in Cargo Terminals Utilizing Virtual Reality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Benzidia, Smail & Makaoui, Naouel & Bentahar, Omar, 2021. "The impact of big data analytics and artificial intelligence on green supply chain process integration and hospital environmental performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    14. Custodio Muianga & Carol Rice & Thomas Lentz & James Lockey & Richard Niemeier & Paul Succop, 2012. "Checklist Model to Improve Work Practices in Small-Scale Demolition Operations with Silica Dust Exposures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, January.
    15. Lucia Vigoroso & Federica Caffaro & Margherita Micheletti Cremasco & Eugenio Cavallo, 2021. "Innovating Occupational Safety Training: A Scoping Review on Digital Games and Possible Applications in Agriculture," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Johnny Dyreborg & Hester Johnstone Lipscomb & Kent Nielsen & Marianne Törner & Kurt Rasmussen & Karen Bo Frydendall & Hans Bay & Ulrik Gensby & Elizabeth Bengtsen & Frank Guldenmund & Pete Kines, 2022. "Safety interventions for the prevention of accidents at work: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    17. Federica Caffaro & Giorgia Bagagiolo & Margherita Micheletti Cremasco & Lucia Vigoroso & Eugenio Cavallo, 2020. "Tailoring Safety Training Material to Migrant Farmworkers: An Ergonomic User-Centred Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Banuri’s, Sheheryar & de Oliveira, Angela C.M. & Eckel, Catherine C., 2019. "Care provision: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 615-630.
    19. Withaya Chanchai & Wanpen Songkham & Pranom Ketsomporn & Punnarat Sappakitchanchai & Wattasit Siriwong & Mark Gregory Robson, 2016. "The Impact of an Ergonomics Intervention on Psychosocial Factors and Musculoskeletal Symptoms among Thai Hospital Orderlies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-10, May.
    20. Greta Mazzetti & Emanuela Valente & Dina Guglielmi & Michela Vignoli, 2020. "Safety Doesn’t Happen by Accident: A Longitudinal Investigation on the Antecedents of Safety Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-13, June.
    21. AnnMarie Lee Walton & Catherine E. LePrevost & Laura Linnan & Ana Sanchez-Birkhead & Kathi Mooney, 2017. "Benefits, Facilitators, Barriers, and Strategies to Improve Pesticide Protective Behaviors: Insights from Farmworkers in North Carolina Tobacco Fields," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-13, June.
    22. Kristin Smith-Crowe & Ann Tenbrunsel & Suzanne Chan-Serafin & Arthur Brief & Elizabeth Umphress & Joshua Joseph, 2015. "The Ethics “Fix”: When Formal Systems Make a Difference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(4), pages 791-801, November.
    23. Yaoshan Xu & Yongjuan Li & Weidong Ding & Fan Lu, 2014. "Controlled versus Automatic Processes: Which Is Dominant to Safety? The Moderating Effect of Inhibitory Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(2), pages 1-9, February.
    24. Lucia Vigoroso & Federica Caffaro & Margherita Micheletti Cremasco & Eugenio Cavallo, 2022. "Improving Tractor Safety: A Comparison between the Usability of a Conventional and Enhanced Rear-Mounted Foldable ROPS (FROPS)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-14, August.
    25. Ismail Ozen & Mustafa Yilmaz & Ilyas Kartal, 2023. "Evaluation of Occupational Safety Courses Given in Undergraduate Departments in Turkey and Investigation of the Effect on Working Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2004.059840_0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.apha.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.