Backward Induction versus Forward Induction Reasoning
In this paper we want to shed some light on what we mean by backward induction and forward induction reasoning in dynamic games. To that purpose, we take the concepts of common belief in future rationality (Perea ) and extensive form rationalizability (Pearce , Battigalli , Battigalli and Siniscalchi ) as possible representatives for backward induction and forward induction reasoning. We compare both concepts on a conceptual, epistemic and an algorithm level, thereby highlighting some of the crucial differences between backward and forward induction reasoning in dynamic games.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgames:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:168-188:d:8864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (XML Conversion Team)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.