IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i7p1715-d1623612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Factor Carbon Emissions Prediction in Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Machine Learning Approach for Carbon Footprint Management

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaopan Liu

    (Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Haonan Yu

    (Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Hanzi Liu

    (Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Zhiqiang Sun

    (Hunan Engineering Research Center of Clean and Low-Carbon Energy Technology, School of Energy Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

Abstract

In coal-fired power plants, accurately accounting for carbon footprints is crucial for reducing greenhouse gas emissions and achieving sustainability goals. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a comprehensive approach that expands the scope of carbon accounting, enabling the calculation of carbon emission data. However, the unclear boundary definition and incomplete data types often lead to insufficient accuracy in model calculations and predictive performance. Herein, we developed machine learning models to predict carbon emissions in a 1000 MW coal-fired power plant. The ElasticNet modeling approach demonstrated exceptional predictive accuracy (R 2 = 0.9514; MAE = 435.42 metric tons CO 2 ). Coal combustion constituted the predominant source of greenhouse gas emissions, with quarterly emissions reaching 1.63 million metric tons in Q1 and 1.11 million metric tons in Q3. Emission intensity exhibited remarkable stability across operational load ranges (1.0–1.1 kg/MWh). Notably, under high-load conditions (>70%), low-calorific-value coal generated marginally higher specific emissions (1.11 kg/MWh) compared to high-calorific-value coal (1.05 kg/MWh). The findings provide rational strategies for optimizing coal procurement strategies and environmental control measures, thereby facilitating an optimal balance between operational efficiency and environmental stewardship.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaopan Liu & Haonan Yu & Hanzi Liu & Zhiqiang Sun, 2025. "Multi-Factor Carbon Emissions Prediction in Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Machine Learning Approach for Carbon Footprint Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1715-:d:1623612
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1715/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/7/1715/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hondo, Hiroki, 2005. "Life cycle GHG emission analysis of power generation systems: Japanese case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 30(11), pages 2042-2056.
    2. Ang, James B., 2009. "CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2658-2665, August.
    3. Enrico Mariutti, 2025. "The Limits of the Current Consensus Regarding the Carbon Footprint of Photovoltaic Modules Manufactured in China: A Review and Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Chen, Chen & Zhao, Chenyu & Liu, Ming & Wang, Chaoyang & Yan, Junjie, 2024. "Enhancing the load cycling rate of subcritical coal-fired power plants: A novel control strategy based on data-driven feedwater active regulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    5. Wang, Ning & Ren, Yixin & Zhu, Tao & Meng, Fanxin & Wen, Zongguo & Liu, Gengyuan, 2018. "Life cycle carbon emission modelling of coal-fired power: Chinese case," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 841-852.
    6. Juan-Carlos Cobos-Torres & Luis-Holguer Idrovo-Ortiz & Sandra Lucia Cobos-Mora & Vinicio Santillan, 2025. "Renewable Energies and Biochar: A Green Alternative for Reducing Carbon Footprints Using Tree Species from the Southern Andean Region of Ecuador," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Hongyun Luo & Xiangyi Lin, 2022. "Dynamic Analysis of Industrial Carbon Footprint and Carbon-Carrying Capacity of Zhejiang Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Michael Whitaker & Garvin A. Heath & Patrick O’Donoughue & Martin Vorum, 2012. "Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Coal‐Fired Electricity Generation," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 16(s1), pages 53-72, April.
    9. Charles T. Driscoll & Jonathan J. Buonocore & Jonathan I. Levy & Kathleen F. Lambert & Dallas Burtraw & Stephen B. Reid & Habibollah Fakhraei & Joel Schwartz, 2015. "US power plant carbon standards and clean air and health co-benefits," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 535-540, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fangyi Li & Zhaoyang Ye & Xilin Xiao & Dawei Ma, 2019. "Environmental Benefits of Stock Evolution of Coal-Fired Power Generators in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Yu, Shiwei & Wei, Yi-Ming & Guo, Haixiang & Ding, Liping, 2014. "Carbon emission coefficient measurement of the coal-to-power energy chain in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 290-300.
    3. Chia-Pin Chio & Wei-Cheng Lo & Ben-Jei Tsuang & Chieh-Chun Hu & Kai-Chen Ku & Yi-Sheng Wang & Yung-Jen Chen & Hsien-Ho Lin & Chang-Chuan Chan, 2022. "County-Wide Mortality Assessments Attributable to PM 2.5 Emissions from Coal Consumption in Taiwan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Jānis Krūmiņš & Māris Kļaviņš, 2023. "Investigating the Potential of Nuclear Energy in Achieving a Carbon-Free Energy Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Chuan-Hsin Chang & Yue-Cune Chang, 2022. "Comparing the Therapeutic Efficacies of Lung Cancer: Network Meta-Analysis Approaches," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-20, November.
    6. Odeh, Naser A. & Cockerill, Timothy T., 2008. "Life cycle GHG assessment of fossil fuel power plants with carbon capture and storage," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 367-380, January.
    7. Shuhao Chang & Qiancheng Wang & Haihua Hu & Zijian Ding & Hansen Guo, 2018. "An NNwC MPPT-Based Energy Supply Solution for Sensor Nodes in Buildings and Its Feasibility Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, December.
    8. Joshua M. Pearce, 2012. "Limitations of Nuclear Power as a Sustainable Energy Source," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(6), pages 1-15, June.
    9. Zhou, Xiaoyan & Zhang, Jie & Li, Junpeng, 2013. "Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 43-51.
    10. Pan, Yue & Chai, Jian & Tian, Lingyue & Zhang, Xiaokong & Wang, Jiaoyan, 2024. "Regional inequality in China's electricity trade," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    11. L. Hay & A. H. B. Duffy & R. I. Whitfield, 2017. "The S‐Cycle Performance Matrix: Supporting Comprehensive Sustainability Performance Evaluation of Technical Systems," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(1), pages 45-70, January.
    12. Yang, Lin & Lv, Haodong & Jiang, Dalin & Fan, Jingli & Zhang, Xian & He, Weijun & Zhou, Jinsheng & Wu, Wenjing, 2020. "Whether CCS technologies will exacerbate the water crisis in China? —A full life-cycle analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Cha, Kyounghoon & Lim, Songtak & Hur, Tak, 2008. "Eco-efficiency approach for global warming in the context of Kyoto Mechanism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 274-280, September.
    14. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nasreen, Samia & Ahmed, Khalid & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2017. "Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 221-232.
    15. Wu, X.D. & Guo, J.L. & Chen, G.Q., 2018. "The striking amount of carbon emissions by the construction stage of coal-fired power generation system in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 358-369.
    16. Piotr Bórawski & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Bogdan Klepacki & Lisa Holden & Tomasz Rokicki & Andrzej Parzonko, 2024. "Changes in Gross Nuclear Electricity Production in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-31, July.
    17. Roy, Jayjit, 2017. "On the environmental consequences of intra-industry trade," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 50-67.
    18. Cui, Qi & He, Ling & Han, Guoyi & Chen, Hao & Cao, Juanjuan, 2020. "Review on climate and water resource implications of reducing renewable power curtailment in China: A nexus perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    19. Varun & Prakash, Ravi & Bhat, I.K., 2010. "A figure of merit for evaluating sustainability of renewable energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(6), pages 1640-1643, August.
    20. Li, Jinying & Li, Sisi & Wu, Fan, 2020. "Research on carbon emission reduction benefit of wind power project based on life cycle assessment theory," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 456-468.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:7:p:1715-:d:1623612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.