IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i5p1027-d1595648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Renewable Energies and Biochar: A Green Alternative for Reducing Carbon Footprints Using Tree Species from the Southern Andean Region of Ecuador

Author

Listed:
  • Juan-Carlos Cobos-Torres

    (Unidad Académica de Posgrado, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador
    Unidad Académica de Ingeniería Industria y Construcción, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador)

  • Luis-Holguer Idrovo-Ortiz

    (Unidad Académica de Ingeniería Industria y Construcción, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador)

  • Sandra Lucia Cobos-Mora

    (Unidad Académica de Posgrado, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador
    Unidad Académica de Ingeniería Industria y Construcción, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador)

  • Vinicio Santillan

    (Unidad Académica de Posgrado, Universidad Católica de Cuenca, Cuenca EC010110, Ecuador)

Abstract

The urgent need for sustainable strategies to mitigate climate change has spurred the development of efficient carbon sequestration methods with minimal greenhouse gas emissions, presenting promising opportunities to produce biochar and, with this bioproduct, enhance crop productivity. Therefore, this research aimed to evaluate the carbon footprint produced by the low-temperature slow pyrolysis of biomass obtained from the pruning residues of four tree species present in parks and gardens of the southern Andean region of Ecuador. An electric reactor (ER), powered by 44 solar panels of 535 W each, was used to perform the pyrolysis process at 350 °C over four hours. For each species— Persea americana , Polylepis spp., Acacia spp., and Prunus salicifolia —three replicates of the process were conducted using 1.5 kg of biomass per trial. The results showed that Acacia spp. residues produced biochar with higher bulk density (0.303 g/cm 3 ), organic matter (82.85%), total organic carbon (71.21%), oxygen (27.84%), C/N ratio (120.69), and potassium (459.12 ppm). The biochar produced from Prunus salicifolia exhibited the highest levels of pollutant gas emissions and carbon footprint (5.93 × 10 −6 ton∙m −3 CO 2 eq and 0.001067 ton∙m −3 CO 2 eq, respectively). In contrast, the biochar produced from Polylepis spp. was the least polluting (0.001018 ton∙m −3 CO 2 eq), highlighting its potential as a source for biochar production from tree species found in the southern Andean region of Ecuador. Meanwhile, the pyrolysis of Persea americana (avocado) resulted in very low gas emissions, although it exhibited the second-highest carbon footprint due to the high energy consumption associated with the process. In conclusion, this study identified Persea americana and Polylepis spp. as the best options for biochar production through pyrolysis, positioning them as viable alternatives for developing sustainable strategies to mitigate climate change.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan-Carlos Cobos-Torres & Luis-Holguer Idrovo-Ortiz & Sandra Lucia Cobos-Mora & Vinicio Santillan, 2025. "Renewable Energies and Biochar: A Green Alternative for Reducing Carbon Footprints Using Tree Species from the Southern Andean Region of Ecuador," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1027-:d:1595648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1027/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/5/1027/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexis Dinno, 2015. "Nonparametric pairwise multiple comparisons in independent groups using Dunn's test," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 15(1), pages 292-300, March.
    2. Gil, Antoni & Barreneche, Camila & Moreno, Pere & Solé, Cristian & Inés Fernández, A. & Cabeza, Luisa F., 2013. "Thermal behaviour of d-mannitol when used as PCM: Comparison of results obtained by DSC and in a thermal energy storage unit at pilot plant scale," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 1107-1113.
    3. José Alberto Soria-González & Raúl Tauro & José Juan Alvarado-Flores & Víctor Manuel Berrueta-Soriano & José Guadalupe Rutiaga-Quiñones, 2022. "Avocado Tree Pruning Pellets ( Persea americana Mill.) for Energy Purposes: Characterization and Quality Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-18, October.
    4. Tomasz Kalak, 2023. "Potential Use of Industrial Biomass Waste as a Sustainable Energy Source in the Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Raúl Tauro & Borja Velázquez-Martí & Silvina Manrique & Martin Ricker & René Martínez-Bravo & Víctor M. Ruiz-García & Saraí Ramos-Vargas & Omar Masera & José A. Soria-González & Cynthia Armendáriz-Arn, 2022. "Potential Use of Pruning Residues from Avocado Trees as Energy Input in Rural Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Ana B. Cuevas & David E. Leiva-Candia & M. P. Dorado, 2024. "An Overview of Pyrolysis as Waste Treatment to Produce Eco-Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-32, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guocheng Li & Cong Wang & Jian Zheng & Zeguang Lu & Zhongmei Zhao & Jinglan Cui & Shaocong Bi & Xinyu Gao & Xiaohu Yang, 2025. "Comprehensive Analysis and Optimization of Day-Ahead Scheduling: Influence of Wind Power Generation and Electric Vehicle Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
    2. Xiaopan Liu & Haonan Yu & Hanzi Liu & Zhiqiang Sun, 2025. "Multi-Factor Carbon Emissions Prediction in Coal-Fired Power Plants: A Machine Learning Approach for Carbon Footprint Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Simona Elena Avram & Lucian Barbu Tudoran & Gheorghe Borodi & Miuta Rafila Filip & Irina Ciotlaus & Ioan Petean, 2025. "Physicochemical Aspects Regarding the Sustainable Conversion of Carwash Slurry as Coverage Admixture for Landfills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-24, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zofia Grodek-Szostak & Marcin Suder & Aneta Piechaczek & Luis Ochoa Siguencia, 2021. "Assessment and Comparison of Digital Competences in Education for Selected European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 348-361.
    2. Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana & Hansson, Helena & Asmild, Mette & Surry, Yves, 2018. "Assessing the regional efficiency of Swedish agriculture under the CAP ‒ a multidirectional efficiency approach," 162nd Seminar, April 26-27, 2018, Budapest, Hungary 271971, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Jepleting, Anceita & Mecha, Achisa C. & Sombei, Dorcas & Moraa, Doricah & Chollom, Martha N., 2025. "Potential of low-cost materials for biogas purification, a review of recent developments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    4. Natalia Matłok & Grzegorz Zaguła & Józef Gorzelany & Maciej Balawejder, 2024. "Analysis of the Energy Potential of Waste Biomass Generated from Fruit Tree Seedling Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Alva, Guruprasad & Lin, Yaxue & Fang, Guiyin, 2018. "An overview of thermal energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 341-378.
    6. Bernardine Chidozie & Ana Ramos & José Vasconcelos & Luis Pinto Ferreira & Reinaldo Gomes, 2024. "Highlighting Sustainability Criteria in Residual Biomass Supply Chains: A Dynamic Simulation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Chen, Ying & Lane, Tom & McDonald, Stuart, 2025. "Endogenous network formation in local public goods: An experimental analysis," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 198-214.
    8. Andreas Aditya Hermawan & Amin Talei & Janet Yip Cheng Leong & Mayuran Jayatharan & Hui Weng Goh & Sina Alaghmand, 2019. "Performance Assessment of a Laboratory Scale Prototype Biofiltration System in Tropical Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Dosi, Giovanni & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Yu, Xiaodan, 2020. "The wage-productivity nexus in the world factory economy," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Baohua Wei & Ziqi Cui & Qilin Wu & Sitong Guo & Wenjing Li & Xinyue Wang & Waishan Qiu, 2025. "Investigating the spatiotemporally heterogeneous effects of macro and micro built environment on sexual violence against women: A case study of Mumbai," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, December.
    11. R Stuart Geiger & Flynn O’Sullivan & Elsie Wang & Jonathan Lo, 2025. "Asking an AI for salary negotiation advice is a matter of concern: Controlled experimental perturbation of ChatGPT for protected and non-protected group discrimination on a contextual task with no cle," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(2), pages 1-34, February.
    12. Cango, Pedro & Ramos-Martín, Jesús & Falconí, Fander, 2024. "Toward food sovereignty and self-sufficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean: opportunities for agricultural complementarity," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 61(01), January.
    13. Sisi Que & Yu Huang & Kwame Awuah-Offei & Liang Wang & Songlin Liu, 2023. "Discrete Choice Experiment Consideration: A Framework for Mining Community Consultation with Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    14. Manevska-Tasevska, Gordana & Hansson, Helena & Asmild, Mette & Surry, Yves, 2021. "Exploring the regional efficiency of the Swedish agricultural sector during the CAP reforms ‒ multi-directional efficiency analysis approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    15. Joanna F. Dipnall & Belinda J. Gabbe & Warwick J. Teague & Ben Beck, 2020. "Identifying Homogeneous Patterns of Injury in Paediatric Trauma Patients to Improve Risk-Adjusted Models of Mortality and Functional Outcomes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, January.
    16. Grzegorz Maj & Kamil Buczyński & Kamila E. Klimek & Magdalena Kapłan, 2024. "Evaluation of Growth and Energy Parameters of One-Year-Old Raspberry Shoots, Depending on the Variety," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Shao, Xue-Feng & Yang, Sheng & Wang, Chao & Yang, Yong-Jian & Wang, Wu-Jun & Zeng, Yi & Fan, Li-Wu, 2019. "Screening of sugar alcohols and their binary eutectic mixtures as phase change materials for low-to-medium temperature thermal energy storage. (Ⅱ): Isothermal melting and crystallization behaviors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 572-583.
    18. Annika Johanna Thies & Felicitas Schneider & Josef Efken, 2021. "The Meat We Do Not Eat. A Survey of Meat Waste in German Hospitality and Food Service Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Rim Lassoued & Janet Music & Sylvain Charlebois & Stuart J. Smyth, 2023. "Canadian Consumers’ Perceptions of Sustainability of Food Innovations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Wu, Chang-Bo & Wu, Gang & Yang, Xi & Liu, Yu-Jing & Liang, Tao & Fu, Wei-Fei & Wang, Mang & Chen, Hong-Zheng, 2015. "Preparation of microencapsulated medium temperature phase change material of Tris(hydroxymethyl)methyl aminomethane@SiO2 with excellent cycling performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 361-368.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:5:p:1027-:d:1595648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.