IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p622-d1579783.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Future of Nuclear Energy: Key Chemical Aspects of Systems for Developing Generation III+, Generation IV, and Small Modular Reactors

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Kiegiel

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Dagmara Chmielewska-Śmietanko

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Irena Herdzik-Koniecko

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Miśkiewicz

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Tomasz Smoliński

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Marcin Rogowski

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Albert Ntang

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Nelson Kiprono Rotich

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Madaj

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Andrzej G. Chmielewski

    (Institute of Nuclear Chemistry and Technology, Dorodna 16, 03-195 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

Nuclear power plants have the lowest life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions intensity and produce more electricity with less land use compared to any other low-carbon-emission-based energy source. There is growing global interest in Generation IV reactors and, at the same time, there is great interest in using small modular reactors. However, the development of new reactors introduces new engineering and chemical challenges critical to advancing nuclear energy safety, efficiency, and sustainability. For Generation III+ reactors, water chemistry control is essential to mitigate corrosion processes and manage radiolysis in the reactor’s primary circuit. Generation IV reactors, such as molten salt reactors (MSRs), face the challenge of handling and processing chemically aggressive coolants. Small modular reactor (SMR) technologies will have to address several drawbacks before the technology can reach technology readiness level 9 (TRL9). Issues related to the management of irradiated graphite from high-temperature reactors (HTR) must be addressed. Additionally, spent fuel processing, along with the disposal and storage of radioactive waste, should be integral to the development of new reactors. This paper presents the key chemical and engineering aspects related to the development of next-generation nuclear reactors and SMRs along with the challenges associated with them.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Kiegiel & Dagmara Chmielewska-Śmietanko & Irena Herdzik-Koniecko & Agnieszka Miśkiewicz & Tomasz Smoliński & Marcin Rogowski & Albert Ntang & Nelson Kiprono Rotich & Krzysztof Madaj & Andrze, 2025. "The Future of Nuclear Energy: Key Chemical Aspects of Systems for Developing Generation III+, Generation IV, and Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-53, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:622-:d:1579783
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/622/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/622/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carless, Travis S. & Talabi, Sola M. & Fischbeck, Paul S., 2019. "Risk and regulatory considerations for small modular reactor emergency planning zones based on passive decontamination potential," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 740-756.
    2. Chapman, P. F., 1974. "1. Energy costs: a review of methods," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 91-103, June.
    3. Hwa Jin Cha & Young Hwan Kim & Hyun Gil Cha & Young Soo Kang, 2007. "PREPARATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OFAg(CORE)/SiO2(SHELL) NANOPARTICLES," Surface Review and Letters (SRL), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(04), pages 693-696.
    4. Chapman, Peter F., 1975. "Energy analysis of nuclear power stations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 285-298, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ludwik Pieńkowski, 2025. "Competitiveness Strategies and Technical Innovations in Light-Water Small Modular Reactor Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-10, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Dunlop, Tessa & Giampietro, Mario, 2020. "Fallacies of energy efficiency indicators: Recognizing the complexity of the metabolic pattern of the economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Freire-González, Jaume, 2017. "Evidence of direct and indirect rebound effect in households in EU-27 countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 270-276.
    3. Kaltenegger, Oliver & Löschel, Andreas & Baikowski, Martin & Lingens, Jörg, 2017. "Energy costs in Germany and Europe: An assessment based on a (total real unit) energy cost accounting framework," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 419-430.
    4. Tang, Xu & Snowden, Simon & Höök, Mikael, 2013. "Analysis of energy embodied in the international trade of UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 418-428.
    5. Sovacool, Benjamin K., 2008. "Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2940-2953, August.
    6. Tezuka, Tetsuo & Okushima, Keisuke & Sawa, Takamitsu, 2002. "Carbon tax for subsidizing photovoltaic power generation systems and its effect on carbon dioxide emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(3-4), pages 677-688, July.
    7. Wang, Changbo & Zhang, Lixiao & Chang, Yuan & Pang, Mingyue, 2021. "Energy return on investment (EROI) of biomass conversion systems in China: Meta-analysis focused on system boundary unification," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    8. Born, Peter, 1996. "Input-output analysis: Input of energy, CO2, and work to produce goods," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 217-221, April.
    9. Wen, Fenghua & Ye, Zhengke & Yang, Huaidong & Li, Ke, 2018. "Exploring the rebound effect from the perspective of household: An analysis of China's provincial level," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 345-356.
    10. Lenzen, Manfred & Dey, Christopher J., 2002. "Economic, energy and greenhouse emissions impacts of some consumer choice, technology and government outlay options," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 377-403, July.
    11. Freire-González, Jaume, 2011. "Methods to empirically estimate direct and indirect rebound effect of energy-saving technological changes in households," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 223(1), pages 32-40.
    12. Hammond, G.P.Geoffrey P., 2004. "Towards sustainability: energy efficiency, thermodynamic analysis, and the `two cultures'," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(16), pages 1789-1798, November.
    13. Sciubba, Enrico, 2024. "A possible reconciliation between exergy analysis, thermo-economics and the resource cost of externalities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    14. Jaume Freire-Gonz lez & Ignasi Puig-Ventosa, 2015. "Energy Efficiency Policies and the Jevons Paradox," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 5(1), pages 69-79.
    15. Schneider, E. & Carlsen, B. & Tavrides, E. & van der Hoeven, C. & Phathanapirom, U., 2013. "A top-down assessment of energy, water and land use in uranium mining, milling, and refining," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 911-926.
    16. Freire-González, Jaume & Font Vivanco, David & Puig-Ventosa, Ignasi, 2017. "Economic structure and energy savings from energy efficiency in households," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 12-20.
    17. Brown, M. T. & Herendeen, R. A., 1996. "Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: a comparative view," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 219-235, December.
    18. Szargut, Jan & Stanek, Wojciech, 2010. "Thermo-climatic cost of the domestic consumption products," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 1196-1199.
    19. Schneider, E. & Carlsen, B. & Tavrides, E. & van der Hoeven, C. & Phathanapirom, U., 2013. "Measures of the environmental footprint of the front end of the nuclear fuel cycle," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 898-910.
    20. Piekarczyk, Wodzisław & Czarnowska, Lucyna & Ptasiński, Krzysztof & Stanek, Wojciech, 2013. "Thermodynamic evaluation of biomass-to-biofuels production systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 95-104.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:622-:d:1579783. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.