IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4610-d1658373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Lifespan Re-Extension Management of Energy Facilities: Economic Assessment and Decision-Making Model for Phased Decommissioning

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Hrinchenko

    (Department of Automation, Metrology and Energy Efficient Technologies, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Olha Prokopenko

    (Estonian Entrepreneurship University of Applied Sciences, Suur-Sojamae 10a, 11415 Tallinn, Estonia
    Department of Business Economics and Administration, Sumy State Makarenko Pedagogical University, 87 Romenska St., 40000 Sumy, Ukraine)

  • Aziza Karbekova

    (Department of Economics, Accounting and Finance, Jalal-Abad State University Named After B. Osmonov, Lenin St. 57, Jalal-Abad 715600, Kyrgyzstan)

  • Nataliia Antonenko

    (Department of Automation, Metrology and Energy Efficient Technologies, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, 4 Svobody Sq., 61000 Kharkiv, Ukraine)

  • Nataliia Kovshun

    (Department of Enterprise Economics and International Business, National University of Water and Environmental Engineering, Soborna St. 11, 33028 Rivne, Ukraine)

  • Tetiana Kubakh

    (Department of Financial Technologies and Entrepreneurship, Sumy State University, Petropavlivska St. 59, 40014 Sumy, Ukraine)

  • Serhii Poliushkin

    (Department of Design and Reconstruction of Architectural Environment, Ukrainian State University of Science and Technologies, 49005 Dnipro, Ukraine)

Abstract

This study proposes a decision-making model based on the economic assessment of phased decommissioning of energy facilities, specifically focusing on a nuclear power plant (NPP). The objective of the research is to develop and validate an economic assessment methodology for comparing immediate and deferred dismantling strategies for a 1000 MW NPP unit. For economic justification, a comparison of the economic expenses is proposed based on the accumulation of radioactive waste, safety activities, and labour costs for the two options. The methods employed include a multifactorial analysis based on expert assessments, considering economic expenses related to radioactive waste accumulation, safety activities, and labour costs. Criteria with differences exceeding 10% for quantitative indicators and fundamental differences for qualitative indicators were deemed significant; each criterion’s acceptability was weighted accordingly. The key results show that deferred dismantling is economically preferable; the total score for deferred dismantling exceeds that of immediate dismantling by approximately 10% (14.16 points vs. 15.86 points). A comparison of block schedules for decommissioning, dynamics of labour costs, and annual volumes of reprocessed radioactive waste for the baseline and optimised deferred dismantling options shows that both options meet the continuity condition of the ‘active’ stages. At the same time, the optimised option demonstrates significant advantages in the uniformity of labour costs and workload of radioactive waste treatment plants during dismantling. The activities at the stage of power unit decommissioning are proposed to be carried out within the licence framework for its operation by the organisational and technical solutions to ensure safety during operation. The deterministic consequences and risks will align with the safety assessment, which will be determined based on the latest analysis results, taking into account sustainable operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Hrinchenko & Olha Prokopenko & Aziza Karbekova & Nataliia Antonenko & Nataliia Kovshun & Tetiana Kubakh & Serhii Poliushkin, 2025. "Sustainable Lifespan Re-Extension Management of Energy Facilities: Economic Assessment and Decision-Making Model for Phased Decommissioning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4610-:d:1658373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4610/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4610/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wankouo Ngouleu, Clint Ameri & Koholé, Yemeli Wenceslas & Fohagui, Fodoup Cyrille Vincelas & Tchuen, Ghislain, 2025. "Optimum design and scheduling strategy of an off-grid hybrid photovoltaic-wind-diesel system with an electrochemical, mechanical, chemical and thermal energy storage systems: A comparative scrutiny," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    2. Kwangheon Park & Seunghyun Son & Jinhyuk Oh & Sunkuk Kim, 2022. "Sustainable Decommissioning Strategies for Nuclear Power Plants: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Lough, W. Timothy & White, K. Preston, 1990. "A critical review of nuclear power plant decommissioning planning studies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(5), pages 471-479, June.
    4. Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2009. "Sensitivity analysis of technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the analytic hierarchy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 788-798, March.
    5. Dongwang Zhang & Tuo Zhou & Zhihong Liu & Hairui Yang & Rushan Bie & Man Zhang, 2024. "Matching Analysis of Technical Parameters and Safety Standards for Nuclear Replacement of Coal-Fired Units," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Min Zhang & Zhao Xu & Guichang Zhang & Binbin Wang & Bin Zhang & Yilong Liu, 2024. "Review on the Application of Living PSA in Nuclear Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    7. Tero Koivunen & Sanna Syri, 2024. "Analysis of Severe Scarcity Situations in Finland’s Low Carbon Electricity System Until 2030," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Iryna Sotnyk & Tetiana Kurbatova & Oleksandr Kubatko & Olha Prokopenko & Gunnar Prause & Yevhen Kovalenko & Galyna Trypolska & Uliana Pysmenna, 2021. "Energy Security Assessment of Emerging Economies under Global and Local Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Yoshihiro Sokawa, 2024. "Radiation-Induced Childhood Thyroid Cancer after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(9), pages 1-9, September.
    10. Bärenbold, Rebekka & Bah, Muhammad Maladoh & Lordan-Perret, Rebecca & Steigerwald, Björn & von Hirschhausen, Christian & Wealer, Ben & Weigt, Hannes & Wimmers, Alexander, 2024. "Decommissioning of commercial nuclear power plants: Insights from a multiple-case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. Prabha Bhola & Alexandros-Georgios Chronis & Panos Kotsampopoulos & Nikos Hatziargyriou, 2023. "Business Model Selection for Community Energy Storage: A Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-30, September.
    12. Hanna Hrinchenko & Olha Prokopenko & Nadiia Shmygol & Viktor Koval & Liliya Filipishyna & Svitlana Palii & Lucian-Ionel Cioca, 2024. "Sustainable Energy Safety Management Utilizing an Industry-Relative Assessment of Enterprise Equipment Technical Condition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, January.
    13. Ivan Pavlenko & Olaf Ciszak & Vladyslav Kondus & Oleksandr Ratushnyi & Oleksandr Ivchenko & Eduard Kolisnichenko & Oleksandr Kulikov & Vitalii Ivanov, 2023. "An Increase in the Energy Efficiency of a New Design of Pumps for Nuclear Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Volk, Rebekka & Hübner, Felix & Hünlich, Tobias & Schultmann, Frank, 2019. "The future of nuclear decommissioning – A worldwide market potential study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 226-261.
    15. Michael G. Pollitt, 2023. "Energy markets under stress: some reflections on lessons from the energy crisis in Europe," Working Papers EPRG2317, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    16. Katarzyna Kiegiel & Dagmara Chmielewska-Śmietanko & Irena Herdzik-Koniecko & Agnieszka Miśkiewicz & Tomasz Smoliński & Marcin Rogowski & Albert Ntang & Nelson Kiprono Rotich & Krzysztof Madaj & Andrze, 2025. "The Future of Nuclear Energy: Key Chemical Aspects of Systems for Developing Generation III+, Generation IV, and Small Modular Reactors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-53, January.
    17. Dzintra Atstaja & Natalija Cudecka-Purina & Viktor Koval & Jekaterina Kuzmina & Janis Butkevics & Hanna Hrinchenko, 2024. "Waste-to-Energy in the Circular Economy Transition and Development of Resource-Efficient Business Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.
    18. Chatzimouratidis, Athanasios I. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2009. "Technological, economic and sustainability evaluation of power plants using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 778-787, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Pastor, R., 2015. "Including management and security of supply constraints for designing stand-alone electrification systems in developing countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 359-369.
    2. Koo, Jamin & Park, Kyungtae & Shin, Dongil & Yoon, En Sup, 2011. "Economic evaluation of renewable energy systems under varying scenarios and its implications to Korea's renewable energy plan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2254-2260, June.
    3. Ishizaka, Alessio & Siraj, Sajid & Nemery, Philippe, 2016. "Which energy mix for the UK (United Kingdom)? An evolutive descriptive mapping with the integrated GAIA (graphical analysis for interactive aid)–AHP (analytic hierarchy process) visualization tool," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 602-611.
    4. Abdul, Daud & Wenqi, Jiang & Tanveer, Arsalan, 2022. "Prioritization of renewable energy source for electricity generation through AHP-VIKOR integrated methodology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1018-1032.
    5. Alkan, Ömer & Albayrak, Özlem Karadağ, 2020. "Ranking of renewable energy sources for regions in Turkey by fuzzy entropy based fuzzy COPRAS and fuzzy MULTIMOORA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 712-726.
    6. Tsita, Katerina G. & Pilavachi, Petros A., 2012. "Evaluation of alternative fuels for the Greek road transport sector using the analytic hierarchy process," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 677-686.
    7. Farboud Khatami & Erfan Goharian, 2022. "Beyond Profitable Shifts to Green Energies, towards Energy Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Milad Kolagar & Seyed Mohammad Hassan Hosseini & Ramin Felegari & Parviz Fattahi, 2020. "Policy-making for renewable energy sources in search of sustainable development: a hybrid DEA-FBWM approach," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(4), pages 485-509, December.
    9. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Dassisti, Michele & Marković, Danijel & Vučković, Goran, 2014. "Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 190-201.
    10. Shen, Yung-Chi & Chou, Chiyang James & Lin, Grace T.R., 2011. "The portfolio of renewable energy sources for achieving the three E policy goals," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 2589-2598.
    11. Wu, Yunna & Xu, Chuanbo & Zhang, Ting, 2018. "Evaluation of renewable power sources using a fuzzy MCDM based on cumulative prospect theory: A case in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1227-1239.
    12. Sani Habibu & Aliyu Bilkisu Adamu & Nuhu Siddique R., 2021. "Assessing Renewable Energy Practice in Turaki Ali House Kaduna-Nigeria," Real Estate Management and Valuation, Sciendo, vol. 29(4), pages 85-96, December.
    13. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Güleryüz, Sezin, 2016. "An integrated DEMATEL-ANP approach for renewable energy resources selection in Turkey," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 435-448.
    14. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis A. & Mun, Johnathan & Rocco S., Claudio M., 2017. "Active management in state-owned energy companies: Integrating a real options approach into multicriteria analysis to make companies sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 487-502.
    15. Saraswat, S.K. & Digalwar, Abhijeet K., 2021. "Empirical investigation and validation of sustainability indicators for the assessment of energy sources in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    16. Giannoulis, E.D. & Haralambopoulos, D.A., 2011. "Distributed Generation in an isolated grid: Methodology of case study for Lesvos - Greece," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(7), pages 2530-2540, July.
    17. B. Domenech & L. Ferrer-Martí & R. Pastor, 2022. "Multicriteria analysis of renewable-based electrification projects in developing countries," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 1375-1401, May.
    18. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Đekić, Petar S. & Mijailović, Ivan & Tomić, Mladen, 2017. "Environmental assessment of waste management scenarios with energy recovery using life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 917-926.
    19. Yi Liu & Yutian Liang & Shiping Ma & Kaixuan Huang, 2017. "Divergent Developmental Trajectories and Strategic Coupling in the Pearl River Delta: Where Is a Sustainable Way of Regional Economic Growth?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, October.
    20. Wee, Hui-Ming & Yang, Wen-Hsiung & Chou, Chao-Wu & Padilan, Marivic V., 2012. "Renewable energy supply chains, performance, application barriers, and strategies for further development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 5451-5465.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4610-:d:1658373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.