IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i17p4475-d1730703.html

Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Selectively Collected Biowaste: Technological Advances, Process Optimization and Energy Recovery Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Beata Bień

    (Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Anna Grobelak

    (Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Jurand Bień

    (Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Daria Sławczyk

    (Faculty of Infrastructure and Environment, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland)

  • Kamil Kozłowski

    (Biogas Technology, Kamil Kozłowski, Jana Woźniaka Street 18, 62-330 Nekla, Poland)

  • Klaudia Wysokowska

    (Biogas Technology, Kamil Kozłowski, Jana Woźniaka Street 18, 62-330 Nekla, Poland)

  • Mateusz Rak

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czestochowa University of Technology, 42-201 Częstochowa, Poland)

Abstract

Given the increasing volume of selectively collected bio-waste and the requirement to increase waste treatment system energy efficiency, dry anaerobic digestion (DAD) represents a more sustainable choice for the treatment of municipal organic fraction instead of conventional technologies. The current paper provides an overview of the existing knowledge on DAD of green waste or kitchen waste collected selectively. Key substrates characteristics (chemical composition, methane potential), novel reactor design and process conditions relevant to effective digestion at elevated dry matter content are considered. Of special interest is the process intensification techniques, impact of contamination and co-fermentation opportunity with other biodegradable wastes. This article also discusses energy and economic performance of DAD plants and puts their environmental burden in perspective versus other bio-waste treatment processes. The current legislation and DAD’s role in the circular economy are also considered. Selectively collected biowaste has significant energy potential and dry anaerobic digestion is an effective technology, especially in areas with limited water availability, offering both waste volume reduction and minimized energy losses. The aim of this work is to introduce the potential of this technology as a sustainable option within the context of renewable energy and modern waste management.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata Bień & Anna Grobelak & Jurand Bień & Daria Sławczyk & Kamil Kozłowski & Klaudia Wysokowska & Mateusz Rak, 2025. "Dry Anaerobic Digestion of Selectively Collected Biowaste: Technological Advances, Process Optimization and Energy Recovery Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-35, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4475-:d:1730703
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4475/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4475/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Zhongzhong & Hu, Yuansheng & Wang, Shun & Wu, Guangxue & Zhan, Xinmin, 2023. "A critical review on dry anaerobic digestion of organic waste: Characteristics, operational conditions, and improvement strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Anna Jasińska & Anna Grosser & Erik Meers & Dagmara Piłyp, 2024. "Stimulating Methane Production from Poultry Manure Digest with Sewage Sludge and Organic Waste by Thermal Pretreatment and Adding Iron or Sodium Hydroxide," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Meneses-Quelal Orlando & Velázquez-Martí Borja, 2020. "Pretreatment of Animal Manure Biomass to Improve Biogas Production: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    5. Józef Ciuła & Iwona Wiewiórska & Marian Banaś & Tadeusz Pająk & Piotr Szewczyk, 2023. "Balance and Energy Use of Biogas in Poland: Prospects and Directions of Development for the Circular Economy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-12, May.
    6. Bartłomiej Macherzyński & Elżbieta Popowska-Nowak & Maria Włodarczyk-Makuła & Beata Bień & Małgorzata Wszelaka-Rylik, 2024. "Intensification of Energy Production in the Anaerobic Digestion Process of Sewage Sludge Using Enzymatic Disintegration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Christos A. Tzenos & Sotirios D. Kalamaras & Eleni-Anna Economou & George Em. Romanos & Charitomeni M. Veziri & Anastasios Mitsopoulos & Georgios C. Menexes & Themistoklis Sfetsas & Thomas A. Kotsopou, 2023. "The Multifunctional Effect of Porous Additives on the Alleviation of Ammonia and Sulfate Co-Inhibition in Anaerobic Digestion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, June.
    8. Li Wu & Jiqun Zhang & Deli Jia & Shuoliang Wang & Yiqun Yan, 2022. "Performance Evaluation of Multistage Fractured Horizontal Wells in Tight Gas Reservoirs at Block M, Ordos Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, January.
    9. René Heller & Christina Brandhorst & Benedikt Hülsemann & Andreas Lemmer & Hans Oechsner, 2023. "Comparison of Different Mechanical Pretreatment Methods for the Anaerobic Digestion of Landscape Management Grass," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-26, December.
    10. Rubén Agregán & José M. Lorenzo & Manoj Kumar & Mohammad Ali Shariati & Muhammad Usman Khan & Abid Sarwar & Muhammad Sultan & Maksim Rebezov & Muhammad Usman, 2022. "Anaerobic Digestion of Lignocellulose Components: Challenges and Novel Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-24, November.
    11. Hans-Joachim Naegele & Andreas Lemmer & Hans Oechsner & Thomas Jungbluth, 2012. "Electric Energy Consumption of the Full Scale Research Biogas Plant “Unterer Lindenhof”: Results of Longterm and Full Detail Measurements," Energies, MDPI, vol. 5(12), pages 1-17, December.
    12. Pöschl, Martina & Ward, Shane & Owende, Philip, 2010. "Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 3305-3321, November.
    13. Tyagi, Vinay Kumar & Fdez-Güelfo, L.A. & Zhou, Yan & Álvarez-Gallego, C.J. & Garcia, L.I. Romero & Ng, Wun Jern, 2018. "Anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW): Progress and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 380-399.
    14. Lal, R., 2011. "Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 33-39, January.
    15. Fernandez, Helen Coarita & Buffiere, Pierre & Bayard, Rémy, 2022. "Understanding the role of mechanical pretreatment before anaerobic digestion: Lab-scale investigations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 193-203.
    16. Wang, Jiongke & Tang, Xiaoyu & Yang, Hongnan & Zhao, Qi & Wang, Heng & Deng, Liangwei & Wang, Wenguo, 2024. "Fixing collapsed dry anaerobic digestion system of kitchen waste caused by severe VFAs accumulation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PA).
    17. Hamelin, Lorie & Naroznova, Irina & Wenzel, Henrik, 2014. "Environmental consequences of different carbon alternatives for increased manure-based biogas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 774-782.
    18. Lal, R., 2011. "Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(S1), pages 33-39.
    19. Anna Grobelak & Beata Bień & Daria Sławczyk & Jurand Bień, 2025. "Conditioning Biomass for Biogas Plants: Innovative Pre-Treatment and Digestate Valorization Techniques to Enhance Soil Health and Fertility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-29, April.
    20. Elena Rossi & Isabella Pecorini & Giovanni Ferrara & Renato Iannelli, 2022. "Dry Anaerobic Digestion of the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste: Biogas Production Optimization by Reducing Ammonia Inhibition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-17, July.
    21. Li, Dong & Huang, Xianbo & Wang, Qingjing & Yuan, Yuexiang & Yan, Zhiying & Li, Zhidong & Huang, Yajun & Liu, Xiaofeng, 2016. "Kinetics of methane production and hydrolysis in anaerobic digestion of corn stover," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamelin, Lorie & Møller, Henrik Bjarne & Jørgensen, Uffe, 2021. "Harnessing the full potential of biomethane towards tomorrow's bioeconomy: A national case study coupling sustainable agricultural intensification, emerging biogas technologies and energy system analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Jónsson, Jón Örvar G. & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur & Nikolaidis, Nikolaos P. & Giannakis, Georgios V., 2019. "Tools for Sustainable Soil Management: Soil Ecosystem Services, EROI and Economic Analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 109-119.
    3. Bacenetti, Jacopo & Sala, Cesare & Fusi, Alessandra & Fiala, Marco, 2016. "Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 669-686.
    4. Federico Battista & Nicola Frison & David Bolzonella, 2019. "Energy and Nutrients’ Recovery in Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural Biomass: An Italian Perspective for Future Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Farrelly, Damien J. & Everard, Colm D. & Fagan, Colette C. & McDonnell, Kevin P., 2013. "Carbon sequestration and the role of biological carbon mitigation: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 712-727.
    6. Michał Pierzchalski, 2022. "Straw Bale Building as a Low-Tech Solution: A Case Study in Northern Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-22, December.
    7. repec:bla:afrdev:v:29:y:2017:i:s2:p:163-178 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Li, Guochun & Niu, Wenquan & Ma, Li & Du, Yadan & Zhang, Qian & Gan, Haicheng & Siddique, Kadambot H.M., 2024. "Effects of drip irrigation upper limits on rhizosphere soil bacterial communities, soil organic carbon, and wheat yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    9. Nur Izzah Hamna A. Aziz & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Haikal Ismail, 2020. "Bioenergy for a Cleaner Future: A Case Study of Sustainable Biogas Supply Chain in the Malaysian Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Mehta, Neha & Anderson, Aine & Johnston, Christopher R. & Rooney, David W., 2022. "Evaluating the opportunity for utilising anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis of livestock manure and grass silage to decarbonise gas infrastructure: A Northern Ireland case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 343-357.
    12. Timothy Capon & Michael Harris & Andrew Reeson, 2013. "The Design of Markets for Soil Carbon Sequestration," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 32(2), pages 161-173, June.
    13. da Costa, Roberto Berlini Rodrigues & Valle, Ramón Molina & Hernández, Juan J. & Malaquias, Augusto César Teixeira & Coronado, Christian J.R. & Pujatti, Fabrício José Pacheco, 2020. "Experimental investigation on the potential of biogas/ethanol dual-fuel spark-ignition engine for power generation: Combustion, performance and pollutant emission analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    14. Jayne, T.S. & Mason, Nicole M. & Burke, William J. & Ariga, Joshua, "undated". "Agricultural Input Subsidy Programs In Africa: An Assessment Of Recent Evidence," Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy Research Papers 259509, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics, Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security (FSP).
    15. Nath, Arun Jyoti & Lal, Rattan, 2017. "Managing tropical wetlands for advancing global rice production: Implications for land-use management," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 681-685.
    16. Wassenaar, T. & Doelsch, E. & Feder, F. & Guerrin, F. & Paillat, J.-M. & Thuriès, L. & Saint Macary, H., 2014. "Returning Organic Residues to Agricultural Land (RORAL) – Fuelling the Follow-the-Technology approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 60-69.
    17. Bartoli, Andrea & Hamelin, Lorie & Rozakis, Stelios & Borzęcka, Magdalena & Brandão, Miguel, 2019. "Coupling economic and GHG emission accounting models to evaluate the sustainability of biogas policies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 133-148.
    18. Tran, Dat Q. & Kurkalova, Lyubov A., "undated". "Testing for complementarity between the use of continuous no-till and cover crops: an application of Entropy approach," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259149, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Hasanpour Seyedlar, Niloufar & Zamir, Seyed Morteza & Nosrati, Mohsen & Rene, Eldon R., 2024. "H2S mitigation for biogas upgrading in a full-scale anaerobic digestion process by using artificial neural network modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    20. Ramírez-Arpide, Félix Rafael & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro & Gallegos-Vázquez, Clemente & Santoyo-Cortés, Vinicio Horacio, 2019. "Bioenergy production from nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure on a farm-scale level: Challenges for its economic feasibility in Mexico," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 383-392.
    21. Sharma, Umesh & Sharma, Shilpa & Sankhyan, Neeraj & Sharma, Sunny & Sharma, Sarthak, 2025. "A global review of agroforestry research and policy directions: Addressing ecological and socioeconomic challenges through systematic review and bibliometric analysis," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4475-:d:1730703. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.