IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3527-d1694322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Time-Varying Dynamics and Socioeconomic Determinants of Energy Consumption and Truck Emissions in Cold Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Ge Zhou

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Str., Harbin 150040, China)

  • Wenhui Zhang

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Str., Harbin 150040, China)

  • Xiaotian Qiao

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Str., Harbin 150040, China)

  • Wenjie Lv

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Str., Harbin 150040, China)

  • Ziwen Song

    (School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, 26 Hexing Str., Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

Facing the increasingly severe challenges of global climate change, China has established clear “dual carbon” goals, with the core objective of achieving carbon peak by 2030 or earlier. However, carbon emissions from the road freight industry have remained higher for many years; understanding and estimating the characteristics of truck carbon emissions are critical for developing a low-carbon transportation system. This study takes Heilongjiang Province, a typically cold region, as a case study. By employing the growth curve method, we predicted the time for achieving carbon peak and constructed an improved STIRPAT model to identify key drivers and pathways for emission reduction in the road freight system. The research results show that only by committing to using the economy to reduce carbon emissions and improve energy intensity can the overall carbon emissions of Heilongjiang Province’s cargo transportation system achieve the “dual carbon” goals as soon as possible. If we develop according to the optimistic scenario proposed in this article, by 2030, the total quantity of trucks will reach about 933,720, and the carbon emissions per vehicle will reach about 178.14 t. If we actively increase the proportion of new energy trucks in the overall quantity of trucks, the peak time is expected to be achieved around 2030. The improvement of technological efficiency (e.g., lowering energy intensity) and the advancement of economic development have been identified as effective pathways for carbon emission reduction. Empirical studies indicate that these measures can achieve emission reduction impacts that are approximately 60 times and 10 times greater, respectively, in terms of efficiency, compared to baseline scenarios. Furthermore, energy intensity improvements and structural shifts toward low-carbon vehicles are critical to expediting peak attainment. This study provides a methodological framework for cold-region emission projections and offers actionable insights for policymakers to design tailored emission reduction pathways in the road freight transportation industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Ge Zhou & Wenhui Zhang & Xiaotian Qiao & Wenjie Lv & Ziwen Song, 2025. "Time-Varying Dynamics and Socioeconomic Determinants of Energy Consumption and Truck Emissions in Cold Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3527-:d:1694322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M'raihi, Rafaa & Mraihi, Talel & Harizi, Riadh & Taoufik Bouzidi, Mohamed, 2015. "Carbon emissions growth and road freight: Analysis of the influencing factors in Tunisia," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 121-129.
    2. Tao, Miaomiao & Lin, Boqiang & Poletti, Stephen, 2025. "Deciphering the impact of electric vehicles on carbon emissions: Some insights from an extended STIRPAT framework," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    3. Steffen Link & Annegret Stephan & Daniel Speth & Patrick Plötz, 2024. "Rapidly declining costs of truck batteries and fuel cells enable large-scale road freight electrification," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 9(8), pages 1032-1039, August.
    4. Verônica Ghisolfi & Lóránt Antal Tavasszy & Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Rodriguez Correia & Gisele de Lorena Diniz Chaves & Glaydston Mattos Ribeiro, 2024. "Dynamics of freight transport decarbonisation: a conceptual model," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 239-257, March.
    5. Emami Javanmard, Majid & Tang, Yili & Martínez-Hernández, J. Adrián, 2024. "Forecasting air transportation demand and its impacts on energy consumption and emission," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    6. Mishra, Nirmalendu Bikash & Mohapatra, Smruti Sourava & Pani, Agnivesh & Sahu, Prasanta K., 2023. "Exploring variation of length of haul and associated freight transport emission of Indian establishments: A survival analysis approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 18-29.
    7. Colovic, Aleksandra & Marinelli, Mario & Ottomanelli, Michele, 2024. "Towards the electrification of freight transport: A network design model for assessing the adoption of eHighways," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 106-120.
    8. Hao, Han & Wang, Hewu & Ouyang, Minggao, 2012. "Fuel consumption and life cycle GHG emissions by China’s on-road trucks: Future trends through 2050 and evaluation of mitigation measures," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 244-251.
    9. Ang, B. W., 2004. "Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy:: which is the preferred method?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1131-1139, June.
    10. Huang, Guanying & Li, Dezhi & Zhou, Shenghua & Ng, S. Thomas & Wang, Wentao & Wang, Lingxiao, 2025. "Public opinion on smart infrastructure in China: Evidence from social media," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Changzheng Zhu & Wenbo Du, 2019. "A Research on Driving Factors of Carbon Emissions of Road Transportation Industry in Six Asia-Pacific Countries Based on the LMDI Decomposition Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Nishijima, Daisuke, 2017. "The role of technology, product lifetime, and energy efficiency in climate mitigation: A case study of air conditioners in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 340-347.
    3. Shi, Changfeng & Zhi, Jiaqi & Yao, Xiao & Zhang, Hong & Yu, Yue & Zeng, Qingshun & Li, Luji & Zhang, Yuxi, 2023. "How can China achieve the 2030 carbon peak goal—a crossover analysis based on low-carbon economics and deep learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    4. Guimarães, Vanessa de Almeida & Leal Junior, Ilton Curty & da Silva, Marcelino Aurélio Vieira, 2018. "Evaluating the sustainability of urban passenger transportation by Monte Carlo simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 732-752.
    5. Löschel, Andreas & Pothen, Frank & Schymura, Michael, 2015. "Peeling the onion: Analyzing aggregate, national and sectoral energy intensity in the European Union," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 63-75.
    6. Zhang, Shulin & Su, Xiaoling & Singh, Vijay P & Ayantobo, Olusola Olaitan & Xie, Juan, 2018. "Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition analysis of changes in agricultural water use: a case study of the middle reaches of the Heihe River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 422-430.
    7. Lu, I.J. & Lin, Sue J. & Lewis, Charles, 2007. "Decomposition and decoupling effects of carbon dioxide emission from highway transportation in Taiwan, Germany, Japan and South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 3226-3235, June.
    8. Trotta, Gianluca, 2020. "Assessing energy efficiency improvements and related energy security and climate benefits in Finland: An ex post multi-sectoral decomposition analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    9. Wang, Wenwen & Li, Man & Zhang, Ming, 2017. "Study on the changes of the decoupling indicator between energy-related CO2 emission and GDP in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 11-18.
    10. de Freitas, Luciano Charlita & Kaneko, Shinji, 2011. "Decomposition of CO2 emissions change from energy consumption in Brazil: Challenges and policy implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 1495-1504, March.
    11. Ling Yang & Michael L. Lahr, 2019. "The Drivers of China’s Regional Carbon Emission Change—A Structural Decomposition Analysis from 1997 to 2007," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    12. Jeffrey C. Peters & Thomas W. Hertel, 2017. "Achieving the Clean Power Plan 2030 CO2 Target with the New Normal in Natural Gas Prices," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 5).
    13. Mohlin, Kristina & Camuzeaux, Jonathan R. & Muller, Adrian & Schneider, Marius & Wagner, Gernot, 2018. "Factoring in the forgotten role of renewables in CO2 emission trends using decomposition analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 290-296.
    14. Ang, B.W. & Liu, Na, 2007. "Energy decomposition analysis: IEA model versus other methods," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 1426-1432, March.
    15. Changfeng Shi & Hang Yuan & Qinghua Pang & Yangyang Zhang, 2020. "Research on the Decoupling of Water Resources Utilization and Agricultural Economic Development in Gansu Province from the Perspective of Water Footprint," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Choi, Ki-Hong & Oh, Wankeun, 2014. "Extended Divisia index decomposition of changes in energy intensity: A case of Korean manufacturing industry," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 275-283.
    17. Xuankai Deng & Yanhua Yu & Yanfang Liu, 2015. "Effect of Construction Land Expansion on Energy-Related Carbon Emissions: Empirical Analysis of China and Its Provinces from 2001 to 2011," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Baležentis, Alvydas & Baležentis, Tomas & Streimikiene, Dalia, 2011. "The energy intensity in Lithuania during 1995–2009: A LMDI approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(11), pages 7322-7334.
    19. Shiraki, Hiroto & Matsumoto, Ken'ichi & Shigetomi, Yosuke & Ehara, Tomoki & Ochi, Yuki & Ogawa, Yuki, 2020. "Factors affecting CO2 emissions from private automobiles in Japan: The impact of vehicle occupancy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    20. Jialing Zou & Weidong Liu & Zhipeng Tang, 2017. "Analysis of Factors Contributing to Changes in Energy Consumption in Tangshan City between 2007 and 2012," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3527-:d:1694322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.