IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p2999-d797673.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mechanical Harvesting of Castor Bean ( Ricinus communis L.) with a Combine Harvester Equipped with Two Different Headers: A Comparison of Working Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Walter Stefanoni

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy)

  • Francesco Latterini

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy)

  • Valantis Malkogiannidis

    (Bios Agrosystem SM SA, Koutso, 67064 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Vlasis Salpiggidis

    (Bios Agrosystem SM SA, Koutso, 67064 Xanthi, Greece)

  • Efthymia Alexopoulou

    (Centre for Renewable Energy Sources and Saving, Marathonos Avenue, 19009 Pikermi, Greece)

  • Luigi Pari

    (Consiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l’analisi dell’Economia Agraria (CREA), Centro di Ricerca Ingegneria e Trasformazioni Agroalimentari, Via della Pascolare 16, 00015 Monterotondo, Italy)

Abstract

Castor bean ( Ricinus communis L.) is a promising industrial crop suitable for cultivation in marginal conditions in the Mediterranean area, but the mechanical harvesting of the seeds is still usually performed manually. In this manuscript, the authors present a preliminary test to assess the effectiveness of equipping a combine harvester with a sunflower header to mechanically harvest castor beans. Machinery performance, seed loss from impact (ISL) and cleaning systems (CSL), and seed cleaning were evaluated and compared with the results obtained from the same combine harvester equipped with a cereal header. According to the results, no statistically significant difference in CSL was found. Values ranged from 162. 41 kg dry matter (DM) ha −1 in the cereal header to 145.56 kg DM ha −1 in the sunflower header, corresponding, respectively, to 8% w / w and 7% w / w of the potential seed yield (PSY). Using the sunflower header significantly lowered ISL (158.16 kg DM ha −1 , i.e., 8% w / w of PSY) in comparison with the cereal header (282.02 kg DM ha −1 , i.e., 14% w / w of PSY). This suggests more gentle cutting and conveying capability of the sunflower header to harvest the plants without losing capsules. On the other hand, the use of different headers did not significantly affect the cleaning of the seeds which averaged at 20% of the total seeds collected in both cases. In conclusion, the study highlights that a conventional combine harvester equipped with a sunflower header could be the first step towards the development of a fully mechanized harvest phase in castor beans which triggers lower seed loss and does not negatively affect the cleaning capacity of the combine harvester. Further studies are also encouraged to confirm these findings in other hybrids.

Suggested Citation

  • Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Valantis Malkogiannidis & Vlasis Salpiggidis & Efthymia Alexopoulou & Luigi Pari, 2022. "Mechanical Harvesting of Castor Bean ( Ricinus communis L.) with a Combine Harvester Equipped with Two Different Headers: A Comparison of Working Performance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-10, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:2999-:d:797673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/2999/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/2999/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilya Gelfand & Ritvik Sahajpal & Xuesong Zhang & R. César Izaurralde & Katherine L. Gross & G. Philip Robertson, 2013. "Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest," Nature, Nature, vol. 493(7433), pages 514-517, January.
    2. Luigi Pari & Francesco Latterini & Walter Stefanoni, 2020. "Herbaceous Oil Crops, a Review on Mechanical Harvesting State of the Art," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, July.
    3. Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Javier Prieto Ruiz & Simone Bergonzoli & Consuelo Attolico & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Mechanical Harvesting of Camelina: Work Productivity, Costs and Seed Loss Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feng Pan & Jincheng Chen & Hui Zhang & Lin Han & Yuncheng Dong & Bin Li & Chao Ji, 2024. "Design and Experiment of Plate Taking Control System of Edible Sunflower ( Edulis helianthus catino L.) Harvester," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Luigi Pari, 2023. "Perennial Grass Species for Bioenergy Production: The State of the Art in Mechanical Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Javier Prieto Ruiz & Simone Bergonzoli & Nadia Palmieri & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Assessing the Camelina ( Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz) Seed Harvesting Using a Combine Harvester: A Case-Study on the Assessment of Work Performance and Seed Loss," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Luigi Pari, 2023. "Perennial Grass Species for Bioenergy Production: The State of the Art in Mechanical Harvesting," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Teng Wu & Fanting Kong & Lei Shi & Qing Xie & Yongfei Sun & Changlin Chen, 2022. "Power Consumption Influence Test of Castor Disc-Cutting Device," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Wu, Jy S. & Tseng, Hui-Kuan & Liu, Xiaoshuai, 2022. "Techno-economic assessment of bioenergy potential on marginal croplands in the U.S. southeast," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    5. Yang Liu & Chengming Luo & Wangyuan Zong & Xiaomao Huang & Lina Ma & Guodang Lian, 2021. "Optimization of Clamping and Conveying Device for Sunflower Oil Combine Harvester Header," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Ujjayant Chakravorty & Marie‐Hélène Hubert & Beyza Ural Marchand, 2019. "Food for fuel: The effect of the US biofuel mandate on poverty in India," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(3), pages 1153-1193, July.
    7. Weidong Huang, 2015. "An Integrated Biomass Production and Conversion Process for Sustainable Bioenergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Hoekman, S. Kent & Broch, Amber & Liu, Xiaowei (Vivian), 2018. "Environmental implications of higher ethanol production and use in the U.S.: A literature review. Part I – Impacts on water, soil, and air quality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3140-3158.
    9. Kiefer, Katharina & Kremer, Jasper & Zeitner, Philipp & Winkler, Bastian & Wagner, Moritz & von Cossel, Moritz, 2023. "Monetizing ecosystem services of perennial wild plant mixtures for bioenergy," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    10. Liu, Kaimin & Fu, Jianqin & Deng, Banglin & Yang, Jing & Tang, Qijun & Liu, Jingping, 2014. "The influences of pressure and temperature on laminar flame propagations of n-butanol, iso-octane and their blends," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 703-715.
    11. Frederik De Wieuw & Tom Pauwels & Christa Sys & Eddy Van de Voorde & Edwin van Hassel & Thierry Vanelslander & Jeffrey Willems, 2023. "Collection and Processing of Roadside Grass Clippings: A Supply Chain Optimization Case Study for East Flanders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Perdue, James H. & Stanturf, John A. & Young, Timothy M. & Huang, Xia & Dougherty, Derek & Pigott, Michael & Guo, Zhimei, 2017. "Profitability potential for Pinus taeda L. (loblolly pine) short-rotation bioenergy plantings in the southern USA," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 146-155.
    13. Baka, Jennifer & Bailis, Robert, 2014. "Wasteland energy-scapes: a comparative energy flow analysis of India's biofuel and biomass economies," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59896, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. Rawat, Lakhpat Singh & Maikhuri, Rakesh Kumar & Bahuguna, Yateesh Mohan & Jugran, Arun Kumar & Maletha, Ajay & Jha, Nabi Kanta & Phondani, Prakash Chandra & Dhyani, Deepak & Pharswan, Dalbeer Singh & , 2022. "Rejuvenating ecosystem services through reclaiming degraded land for sustainable societal development: Implications for conservation and human wellbeing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    15. Pietro Sciusco & Jiquan Chen & Vincenzo Giannico & Michael Abraha & Cheyenne Lei & Gabriela Shirkey & Jing Yuan & G. Philip Robertson, 2022. "Albedo-Induced Global Warming Impact at Multiple Temporal Scales within an Upper Midwest USA Watershed," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    16. Searchinger, Timothy D. & Beringer, Tim & Strong, Asa, 2017. "Does the world have low-carbon bioenergy potential from the dedicated use of land?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 434-446.
    17. Van Meerbeek, Koenraad & Muys, Bart & Hermy, Martin, 2019. "Lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy beyond intensive cropland and forests," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 139-149.
    18. Yakubu Abdul-Salam & Melf-Hinrich Ehlers & Jelte Harnmeijer, 2017. "Anaerobic Digestion of Feedstock Grown on Marginal Land: Break-Even Electricity Prices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    19. Saha, Mithun & Eckelman, Matthew J., 2015. "Geospatial assessment of potential bioenergy crop production on urban marginal land," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 540-547.
    20. Walter Stefanoni & Francesco Latterini & Javier Prieto Ruiz & Simone Bergonzoli & Consuelo Attolico & Luigi Pari, 2020. "Mechanical Harvesting of Camelina: Work Productivity, Costs and Seed Loss Evaluation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:2999-:d:797673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.