IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i5p1858-d762983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Integrated Approach-Based FMECA for Risk Assessment: Application to Offshore Wind Turbine Pitch System

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Wang

    (Xi’an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Rongxi Wang

    (The State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Wei Deng

    (Xi’an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710054, China)

  • Yong Zhao

    (Xi’an Thermal Power Research Institute Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710054, China)

Abstract

Failure mode, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) is a well-known reliability analysis tool for recognizing, evaluating and prioritizing the known or potential failures in system, design, and process. In conventional FMECA, the failure modes are evaluated by using three risk factors, severity ( S ), occurrence ( O ) and detectability ( D ), and their risk priorities are determined by multiplying the crisp values of risk factors to obtain their risk priority numbers (RPNs). However, the conventional RPN has been considerably criticized due to its various shortcomings. Although significant efforts have been made to enhance the performance of traditional FMECA, some drawbacks still exist and need to be addressed in the real application. In this paper, a new FMECA model for risk analysis is proposed by using an integrated approach, which introduces Z -number, Rough number, the Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) method and the VIsekriterijumska optimizacija i KOmpromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method to FMECA to overcome its deficiencies in real application. The novelty of this paper in theory is that the proposed approach integrates the strong expressive ability of Z -numbers to vagueness and uncertainty information, the strong point of DEMATEL method in studying the dependence among failure modes, the advantage of rough numbers for aggregating experts’ diversity evaluations, and the strength of VIKOR method to flexibly model multi-criteria decision-making problems. Based on the integrated approach, the proposed risk assessment model can favorably capture and aggregate FMECA team members’ diversity evaluations and prioritize failure modes under different types of uncertainties with considering the failure propagation. In terms of application, the proposed approach was applied to the risk analysis of failure modes in offshore wind turbine pitch system, and it can also be used in many industrial fields for risk assessment and safety analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Wang & Rongxi Wang & Wei Deng & Yong Zhao, 2022. "An Integrated Approach-Based FMECA for Risk Assessment: Application to Offshore Wind Turbine Pitch System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1858-:d:762983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1858/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/5/1858/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim & Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Høyland, Sindre, 2016. "On the need for revising healthcare failure mode and effect analysis for assessing potential for patient harm in healthcare processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 160-168.
    2. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2007. "Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 178(2), pages 514-529, April.
    3. Mahmood Shafiee & Fateme Dinmohammadi, 2014. "An FMEA-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Wind Turbine Systems: A Comparative Study of Onshore and Offshore," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-24, February.
    4. Carpitella, Silvia & Certa, Antonella & Izquierdo, Joaquín & La Fata, Concetta Manuela, 2018. "A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 394-402.
    5. Huang, Jia & Li, Zhaojun(Steven) & Liu, Hu-Chen, 2017. "New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 302-309.
    6. Wu, Hsin-Hung & Chang, Shih-Yu, 2015. "A case study of using DEMATEL method to identify critical factors in green supply chain management," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 256(C), pages 394-403.
    7. Opricovic, Serafim & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2004. "Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(2), pages 445-455, July.
    8. Deyun Zhou & Yongchuan Tang & Wen Jiang, 2016. "A Modified Model of Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Based on Generalized Evidence Theory," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2016, pages 1-11, August.
    9. Liou, James J.H. & Tsai, Chieh-Yuan & Lin, Rong-Ho & Tzeng, Gwo-Hshiung, 2011. "A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 57-61.
    10. Samet Ozturk & Vasilis Fthenakis & Stefan Faulstich, 2018. "Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis for Wind Turbines Considering Climatic Regions and Comparing Geared and Direct Drive Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Hu-Chen Liu & Jian-Xin You & Shouming Chen & Yi-Zeng Chen, 2016. "An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 1027-1042, November.
    12. Hu-Chen Liu & Yi-Zeng Chen & Jian-Xin You & Hui Li, 2016. "Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 805-816, August.
    13. Certa, Antonella & Hopps, Fabrizio & Inghilleri, Roberta & La Fata, Concetta Manuela, 2017. "A Dempster-Shafer Theory-based approach to the Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) under epistemic uncertainty: application to the propulsion system of a fishing vessel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 69-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ievgen Babeshko & Oleg Illiashenko & Vyacheslav Kharchenko & Kostiantyn Leontiev, 2022. "Towards Trustworthy Safety Assessment by Providing Expert and Tool-Based XMECA Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-25, June.
    2. Arpit Sharma & Gajanand Gupta, 2023. "Comparative analysis of conventional and fuzzy FMECA approach for criticality analysis of a vertical roller mill," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 14(4), pages 1395-1420, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heng Zhang & Yaya Chen & Jingyu Cong & Junxiao Liu & Zhifu Zhang & Xirui Zhang, 2023. "Reliability Study of an Intelligent Profiling Progressive Automatic Glue Cutter Based on the Improved FMECA Method," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Huang, Jia & Li, Zhaojun(Steven) & Liu, Hu-Chen, 2017. "New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 302-309.
    3. Jianghong Zhu & Bin Shuai & Rui Wang & Kwai-Sang Chin, 2019. "Risk Assessment for Failure Mode and Effects Analysis Using the Bonferroni Mean and TODIM Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Xiao, Jing & Chiclana, Francisco & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2021. "Consensus and opinion evolution-based failure mode and effect analysis approach for reliability management in social network and uncertainty contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    5. Moath Alrifaey & Tang Sai Hong & Eris Elianddy Supeni & Azizan As’arry & Chun Kit Ang, 2019. "Identification and Prioritization of Risk Factors in an Electrical Generator Based on the Hybrid FMEA Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Samanci, Simge & Didem Atalay, Kumru & Bahar Isin, Feride, 2021. "Focusing on the big picture while observing the concerns of both managers and passengers in the post-covid era," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. María Carmen Carnero, 2020. "Waste Segregation FMEA Model Integrating Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set and the PAPRIKA Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Shu-Kung Hu & James J. H. Liou & Ming-Tsang Lu & Yen-Ching Chuang & Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, 2018. "Improving NFC Technology Promotion for Creating the Sustainable Education Environment by Using a Hybrid Modified MADM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-24, April.
    9. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Tsai, Pei-Hsuan & Chen, Chih-Jou, 2021. "Entertainment in retailing: Challenges and opportunities in the TV game console industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    11. Gudiel Pineda, Pedro Jose & Liou, James J.H. & Hsu, Chao-Che & Chuang, Yen-Ching, 2018. "An integrated MCDM model for improving airline operational and financial performance," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 103-117.
    12. Jingmei Xiao & Mei Cai & Yu Gao, 2022. "A VIKOR-Based Linguistic Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Model in a Quantum Decision Scenario," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-23, June.
    13. Li, Ying & Liu, Peide & Li, Gang, 2023. "An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    14. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Jia, Yuning & Song, Wenyan, 2021. "A new approach for risk assessment of failure modes considering risk interaction and propagation effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Hisham Alidrisi, 2021. "An Innovative Job Evaluation Approach Using the VIKOR Algorithm," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-19, June.
    16. Serafim Opricovic, 2009. "A Compromise Solution in Water Resources Planning," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 23(8), pages 1549-1561, June.
    17. Sirirat Sae Lim & Hong Ngoc Nguyen & Chia-Li Lin, 2022. "Exploring the Development Strategies of Science Parks Using the Hybrid MCDM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-29, April.
    18. Zeynep Gamze Mert & Gülşen Akman, 2011. "The Profile of the Organized Industrial Zones in Kocaeli/TURKEY," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1137, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Haji Vahabzadeh, Ali & Asiaei, Arash & Zailani, Suhaiza, 2015. "Reprint of “Green decision-making model in reverse logistics using FUZZY-VIKOR method”," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PB), pages 334-347.
    20. Saja Kosanović & Mirjana Miletić & Ljubo Marković, 2021. "Energy Refurbishment of Family Houses in Serbia in Line with the Principles of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:5:p:1858-:d:762983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.