IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v155y2016icp160-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the need for revising healthcare failure mode and effect analysis for assessing potential for patient harm in healthcare processes

Author

Listed:
  • Abrahamsen, HÃ¥kon Bjorheim
  • Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim
  • Høyland, Sindre

Abstract

Healthcare Failure Mode and Effect Analysis is a proactive, systematic method adapted from safety-critical industries increasingly used to assess the potential for patient harm in high-risk healthcare processes. In this paper we review and discuss this method. We point to some weaknesses and finally argue for two adjustments. One adjustment is regarding the way in which risk is evaluated, and the other is to adopt a broader evaluation of barrier performance. Examples are given from prehospital critical care and from the operating room environment within hospitals to illustrate these ideas.

Suggested Citation

  • Abrahamsen, HÃ¥kon Bjorheim & Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Høyland, Sindre, 2016. "On the need for revising healthcare failure mode and effect analysis for assessing potential for patient harm in healthcare processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 160-168.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:155:y:2016:i:c:p:160-168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.06.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095183201630179X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.06.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hernandez-Perdomo, Elvis & Guney, Yilmaz & Rocco, Claudio M., 2019. "A reliability model for assessing corporate governance using machine learning techniques," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 220-231.
    2. Zhen Wang & Rongxi Wang & Wei Deng & Yong Zhao, 2022. "An Integrated Approach-Based FMECA for Risk Assessment: Application to Offshore Wind Turbine Pitch System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Liu, Jintao & Schmid, Felix & Zheng, Wei & Zhu, Jiebei, 2019. "Understanding railway operational accidents using network theory," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 218-231.
    4. Faiella, Giuliana & Parand, Anam & Franklin, Bryony Dean & Chana, Prem & Cesarelli, Mario & Stanton, Neville A. & Sevdalis, Nick, 2018. "Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: A composite proactive risk analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 117-126.
    5. Thanh-Lam Nguyen & Ming-Hung Shu & Bi-Min Hsu, 2016. "Extended FMEA for Sustainable Manufacturing: An Empirical Study in the Non-Woven Fabrics Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Peter Chemweno & Liliane Pintelon, 2020. "A comparative risk assessment of dialysis care processes in the home and hospital care contexts," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(5), pages 985-1002, October.
    7. Ferenc Bognár & Csaba Hegedűs, 2022. "Analysis and Consequences on Some Aggregation Functions of PRISM (Partial Risk Map) Risk Assessment Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Li, Ying & Liu, Peide & Li, Gang, 2023. "An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    9. Huang, Jia & Li, Zhaojun(Steven) & Liu, Hu-Chen, 2017. "New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 302-309.
    10. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Jia, Yuning & Song, Wenyan, 2021. "A new approach for risk assessment of failure modes considering risk interaction and propagation effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:155:y:2016:i:c:p:160-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.