IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v235y2023ics0951832023001114.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Ying
  • Liu, Peide
  • Li, Gang

Abstract

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) method is widely utilized as an important reliability management tool to effectively evaluate and prevent risk problems that occur in all aspects of production. Considering the restriction of enterprise resources and diversity of FMEA expert interests, building a consensus based FMEA method based on expert cost and risk attitude can improve the quality of reliability management. Therefore, this paper develops an improved FMEA method based on risk attitude and asymmetric cost consensus. Firstly, the FMEA consensus reaching process based on the risk attitudes and asymmetric costs is proposed. Then, the FMEA expert evaluation aggregation process of dynamic expert weight calculation model is constructed. Further, the failure mode final ranking process is developed based on the HARA (hyberbolic absolute risk aversion) utility function and Disappointment theory. The reliability and effectiveness of the proposed FMEA method can be demonstrated by the practical case and simulation experiments. The improved FMEA method can enhance the efficiency and reliability of risk assessment and further promote the acceptance and execution of assessment results. Findings proved that the adaptive consensus based FMEA method can not only save the enterprise costs but also improve the flexibility and quality of risk management.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Ying & Liu, Peide & Li, Gang, 2023. "An asymmetric cost consensus based failure mode and effect analysis method with personalized risk attitude information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:235:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023001114
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2023.109196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832023001114
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2023.109196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim & Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Høyland, Sindre, 2016. "On the need for revising healthcare failure mode and effect analysis for assessing potential for patient harm in healthcare processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 160-168.
    2. Gong, Zaiwu & Zhang, Huanhuan & Forrest, Jeffrey & Li, Lianshui & Xu, Xiaoxia, 2015. "Two consensus models based on the minimum cost and maximum return regarding either all individuals or one individual," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(1), pages 183-192.
    3. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    4. Huang, Jia & You, Jian-Xin & Liu, Hu-Chen & Song, Ming-Shun, 2020. "Failure mode and effect analysis improvement: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Xiao, Jing & Chiclana, Francisco & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2021. "Consensus and opinion evolution-based failure mode and effect analysis approach for reliability management in social network and uncertainty contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    6. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Failure mode and effect analysis considering the fairness-oriented consensus of a large group with core-periphery structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Liu, Hu-Chen & You, Jian-Xin & Duan, Chun-Yan, 2019. "An integrated approach for failure mode and effect analysis under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 163-172.
    8. Ding, Rui & Liu, Zehua & Xu, Jintao & Meng, Fanpeng & Sui, Yang & Men, Xinhong, 2021. "A novel approach for reliability assessment of residual heat removal system for HPR1000 based on failure mode and effect analysis, fault tree analysis, and fuzzy Bayesian network methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Erick Moreno-Centeno & Adolfo R. Escobedo, 2016. "Axiomatic aggregation of incomplete rankings," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(6), pages 475-488, June.
    10. Zhang, Bowen & Dong, Yucheng & Zhang, Hengjie & Pedrycz, Witold, 2020. "Consensus mechanism with maximum-return modifications and minimum-cost feedback: A perspective of game theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 546-559.
    11. Huang, Jia & Li, Zhaojun(Steven) & Liu, Hu-Chen, 2017. "New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 302-309.
    12. Zhang, Huanhuan & Kou, Gang & Peng, Yi, 2019. "Soft consensus cost models for group decision making and economic interpretations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 964-980.
    13. Cheng, Dong & Zhou, Zhili & Cheng, Faxin & Zhou, Yanfang & Xie, Yujing, 2018. "Modeling the minimum cost consensus problem in an asymmetric costs context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(3), pages 1122-1137.
    14. Philippe Delquié & Alessandra Cillo, 2006. "Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 197-215, December.
    15. Cheng, Dong & Yuan, Yuxiang & Wu, Yong & Hao, Tiantian & Cheng, Faxin, 2022. "Maximum satisfaction consensus with budget constraints considering individual tolerance and compromise limit behaviors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 221-238.
    16. Davtalab-Olyaie, Mostafa & Asgharian, Masoud, 2021. "On Pareto-optimality in the cross-efficiency evaluation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 288(1), pages 247-257.
    17. Hamzeh Soltanali & Abbas Rohani & Mohammad Hossein Abbaspour-Fard & Aditya Parida & José Torres Farinha, 2020. "Development of a risk-based maintenance decision making approach for automotive production line," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(1), pages 236-251, February.
    18. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais & José Torres Farinha, 2022. "Sustainable Food Production: An Intelligent Fault Diagnosis Framework for Analyzing the Risk of Critical Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-22, January.
    19. Hao Peng & Qianmei Feng & David Coit, 2010. "Reliability and maintenance modeling for systems subject to multiple dependent competing failure processes," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 12-22.
    20. Gao, Jianwei & Li, Ming & Liu, Huihui, 2015. "Generalized ordered weighted utility averaging-hyperbolic absolute risk aversion operators and their applications to group decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 243(1), pages 258-270.
    21. Hengjie Zhang & Yucheng Dong & Jing Xiao & Francisco Chiclana & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2020. "Personalized individual semantics-based approach for linguistic failure modes and effects analysis with incomplete preference information," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(11), pages 1275-1296, November.
    22. Hu-Chen Liu & Jian-Xin You & Shouming Chen & Yi-Zeng Chen, 2016. "An integrated failure mode and effect analysis approach for accurate risk assessment under uncertainty," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(11), pages 1027-1042, November.
    23. Gao, Jianwei & Li, Ming & Liu, Huihui, 2015. "Generalized ordered weighted utility proportional averaging-hyperbolic absolute risk aversion operators and their applications to group decision-making," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 114-132.
    24. Héctor H. Guerrero & James R. Bradley, 2013. "Failure Modes and Effects Analysis: An Evaluation of Group versus Individual Performance," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 22(6), pages 1524-1539, November.
    25. Kristin McCullough & Nader Ebrahimi, 2018. "Approximate Bayesian computation for censored data and its application to reliability assessment," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 419-430, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Peide & Li, Ying, 2021. "An improved failure mode and effect analysis method for multi-criteria group decision-making in green logistics risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Xiao, Jing & Chiclana, Francisco & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2021. "Consensus and opinion evolution-based failure mode and effect analysis approach for reliability management in social network and uncertainty contexts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    3. Meng, Fan-Yong & Gong, Zai-Wu & Pedrycz, Witold & Chu, Jun-Fei, 2023. "Selfish-dilemma consensus analysis for group decision making in the perspective of cooperative game theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 308(1), pages 290-305.
    4. Wang, Qun & Jia, Guozhu & Jia, Yuning & Song, Wenyan, 2021. "A new approach for risk assessment of failure modes considering risk interaction and propagation effects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Gong, Zaiwu & Guo, Weiwei & Słowiński, Roman, 2021. "Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Faghih-Roohi, Shahrzad & Akcay, Alp & Zhang, Yingqian & Shekarian, Ehsan & de Jong, Eelco, 2020. "A group risk assessment approach for the selection of pharmaceutical product shipping lanes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Cheng, Dong & Yuan, Yuxiang & Wu, Yong & Hao, Tiantian & Cheng, Faxin, 2022. "Maximum satisfaction consensus with budget constraints considering individual tolerance and compromise limit behaviors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(1), pages 221-238.
    8. Guo, Weiwei & Gong, Zaiwu & Zhang, Wei-Guo & Xu, Yanxin, 2023. "Minimum cost consensus modeling under dynamic feedback regulation mechanism considering consensus principle and tolerance level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(3), pages 1279-1295.
    9. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "Failure mode and effect analysis considering the fairness-oriented consensus of a large group with core-periphery structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    10. Zhang, Bowen & Dong, Yucheng & Zhang, Hengjie & Pedrycz, Witold, 2020. "Consensus mechanism with maximum-return modifications and minimum-cost feedback: A perspective of game theory," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 546-559.
    11. Labella, Álvaro & Liu, Hongbin & Rodríguez, Rosa M. & Martínez, Luis, 2020. "A Cost Consensus Metric for Consensus Reaching Processes based on a comprehensive minimum cost model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 281(2), pages 316-331.
    12. Zhen Wang & Rongxi Wang & Wei Deng & Yong Zhao, 2022. "An Integrated Approach-Based FMECA for Risk Assessment: Application to Offshore Wind Turbine Pitch System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, March.
    13. Jian Wu & Jun Chen & Wei Liu & Yujia Liu & Changyong Liang & Mingshuo Cao, 2022. "A Calibrated Individual Semantic Based Failure Mode and Effect Analysis and Its Application in Industrial Internet Platform," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(14), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Jing Xiao & Xiuli Wang & Hengjie Zhang, 2022. "Exploring the Ordinal Classifications of Failure Modes in the Reliability Management: An Optimization-Based Consensus Model with Bounded Confidences," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 49-80, February.
    15. Rodríguez, Rosa M. & Labella, Álvaro & Nuñez-Cacho, Pedro & Molina-Moreno, Valentin & Martínez, Luis, 2022. "A comprehensive minimum cost consensus model for large scale group decision making for circular economy measurement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    16. Ying Ji & Huanhuan Li & Huijie Zhang, 2022. "Risk-Averse Two-Stage Stochastic Minimum Cost Consensus Models with Asymmetric Adjustment Cost," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(2), pages 261-291, April.
    17. Du, Junliang & Liu, Sifeng & Liu, Yong, 2022. "A limited cost consensus approach with fairness concern and its application," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 261-275.
    18. Tang, Ming & Liao, Huchang, 2021. "From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    19. Faiella, Giuliana & Parand, Anam & Franklin, Bryony Dean & Chana, Prem & Cesarelli, Mario & Stanton, Neville A. & Sevdalis, Nick, 2018. "Expanding healthcare failure mode and effect analysis: A composite proactive risk analysis approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 117-126.
    20. Ranka Gojković & Goran Đurić & Danijela Tadić & Snežana Nestić & Aleksandar Aleksić, 2021. "Evaluation and Selection of the Quality Methods for Manufacturing Process Reliability Improvement—Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Genetic Algorithm Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:235:y:2023:i:c:s0951832023001114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.