IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i17p6442-d905844.html

An Empirical Investigation of Ecological Footprint Using Nuclear Energy, Industrialization, Fossil Fuels and Foreign Direct Investment

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Usman

    (Institute for Region and Urban-Rural Development, Center for Industrial Development and Regional Competitiveness, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)

  • Atif Jahanger

    (School of Economics, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China)

  • Muhammad Sohail Amjad Makhdum

    (Department of Economics, Government College University, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan)

  • Magdalena Radulescu

    (Department of Finance, Accounting and Economics, University of Pitesti, 110040 Pitesti, Romania
    Institute for Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Studies, University “Lucian Blaga” Sibiu, Bd. Victoriei, No. 10, 550024 Sibiu, Romania)

  • Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente

    (Department of Political Economy and Public Finance, Economic and Business Statistics and Economic Policy, University of Castilla La-Mancha, 13001 Ciudad Real, Spain
    Department of Applied Economics, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain)

  • Elena Jianu

    (Department of Management and Business Administration, University of Pitesti, 110040 Pitesti, Romania)

Abstract

The G-7 economies comprise a few of the global, mainly economically developed countries. On the other hand, in conjunction with these high economic development performances, the ecological behaviors in G-7 anions have concurrently provoked to elevate deep apprehensions among the stakeholders. Therefore, the present research aims to empirically investigate the environmental influences of nuclear energy, industrialization, fossil fuel energy, and foreign direct investment (FDI) in the G-7 nations between 1991 and 2018. After checking the cross-sectional dependency, this study employed the first-generation ((full modified ordinary least square (FMOLS), dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS)) and second-generation (Driscoll and Kraay (D-K), feasible generalized least square (FGLS)) approaches for robust and reliable findings. The findings explore that nuclear energy production is ineffective in curbing the figure of ecological footprints in the long-run. Moreover, the industrialization process and fossil fuel energy consumption reduce environmental quality in the G-7 economies. More to the point, the empirical findings recommend that these nations can renovate their industrial production procedures in an eco-friendly behavior they can experience an unsoiled deployment of the energy transition. Similarly, the FDI also degrades environmental eminence in the long-run. This validates the pollution haven hypothesis in the G-7 countries. Based on these results, this study suggests the G-7 nations should reduce the production of nuclear energy levels, the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy production in the industrial sector, reduce fossil fuel-based foreign investment, and assimilate ecological welfare strategies within their development planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Usman & Atif Jahanger & Muhammad Sohail Amjad Makhdum & Magdalena Radulescu & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Elena Jianu, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of Ecological Footprint Using Nuclear Energy, Industrialization, Fossil Fuels and Foreign Direct Investment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6442-:d:905844
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6442/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/17/6442/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Zeeshan & Malik, Muhammad Yousaf & Latif, Kashmala & Jiao, Zhilun, 2020. "Heterogeneous effect of eco-innovation and human capital on renewable & non-renewable energy consumption: Disaggregate analysis for G-7 countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    2. Murshed, Muntasir, 2019. "Trade Liberalization Policies and Renewable Energy Transition in Low and Middle-Income Countries? An Instrumental Variable Approach," MPRA Paper 97075, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Pedroni, Peter, 2004. "Panel Cointegration: Asymptotic And Finite Sample Properties Of Pooled Time Series Tests With An Application To The Ppp Hypothesis," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(3), pages 597-625, June.
    4. Hazuki Ishida, 2018. "Can Nuclear Energy Contribute to the Transition Toward a Low-carbon Economy? The Japanese Case," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 8(1), pages 62-68.
    5. Dumitrescu, Elena-Ivona & Hurlin, Christophe, 2012. "Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1450-1460.
    6. Mustafa Kamal & Muhammad Usman & Atif Jahanger & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente, 2021. "Revisiting the Role of Fiscal Policy, Financial Development, and Foreign Direct Investment in Reducing Environmental Pollution during Globalization Mode: Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Panel Data Approaches," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Usman, Muhammad & Makhdum, Muhammad Sohail Amjad, 2021. "What abates ecological footprint in BRICS-T region? Exploring the influence of renewable energy, non-renewable energy, agriculture, forest area and financial development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 12-28.
    8. Joakim Westerlund, 2007. "Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 69(6), pages 709-748, December.
    9. John C. Driscoll & Aart C. Kraay, 1998. "Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation With Spatially Dependent Panel Data," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 80(4), pages 549-560, November.
    10. Xuejun Qian & Seong Lee & Ana-maria Soto & Guangming Chen, 2018. "Regression Model to Predict the Higher Heating Value of Poultry Waste from Proximate Analysis," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-14, June.
    11. Kao, Chihwa, 1999. "Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 1-44, May.
    12. Ang, James B., 2007. "CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 4772-4778, October.
    13. Usman, Muhammad & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2022. "Environmental concern in the era of industrialization: Can financial development, renewable energy and natural resources alleviate some load?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    14. Jaforullah, Mohammad & King, Alan, 2015. "Does the use of renewable energy sources mitigate CO2 emissions? A reassessment of the US evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 711-717.
    15. Ahmad, Ashfaq & Zhao, Yuhuan & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Bano, Sadia & Zhang, Zhonghua & Wang, Song & Liu, Ya, 2016. "Carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth: An aggregate and disaggregate analysis of the Indian economy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 131-143.
    16. Gyamfi, Bright Akwasi & Agozie, Divine Q. & Bekun, Festus Victor, 2022. "Can technological innovation, foreign direct investment and natural resources ease some burden for the BRICS economies within current industrial era?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    17. Menyah, Kojo & Wolde-Rufael, Yemane, 2010. "CO2 emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy and economic growth in the US," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 2911-2915, June.
    18. Dogan, Eyup & Majeed, Muhammad Tariq & Luni, Tania, 2022. "Revisiting the nexus of ecological footprint, unemployment, and renewable and non-renewable energy for South Asian economies: Evidence from novel research methods," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1060-1070.
    19. Rahman, Mohammad Mafizur & Alam, Khosrul, 2022. "Impact of industrialization and non-renewable energy on environmental pollution in Australia: Do renewable energy and financial development play a mitigating role?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 203-213.
    20. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2007. "A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 22(2), pages 265-312.
    21. Jochen Heberle & Cristina Sattarhoff, 2017. "A Fast Algorithm for the Computation of HAC Covariance Matrix Estimators," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, January.
    22. Acheampong, Alex O., 2018. "Economic growth, CO2 emissions and energy consumption: What causes what and where?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 677-692.
    23. Peter Pedroni, 2001. "Purchasing Power Parity Tests In Cointegrated Panels," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(4), pages 727-731, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hicham Ayad & Abdelhak Lefilef & Atif Jahanger & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente, 2024. "Reinvestigate the Effect of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Quality in the MENA Region: Is There Any Difference Using the Load Capacity Factor?," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14810-14840, September.
    2. Mohammad Tawfiq Noorzai & Aziz Kutlar & Aneta Bełdycka-Bórawska & Tomasz Rokicki & Piotr Bórawski, 2025. "Evaluation of the Relationship Between Ecological Footprint, Economic and Political Stability Variables in SAARC Countries with PVAR Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Tri Wahyu Adi & Pawenary Pawenary & Eri Prabowo, 2023. "Nuclear Energy Generation, Fossil Fuel Price, Energy Mix Generation, Economic Growth, FDI Inflow and CO2 Emission: A Case Study on Developed and Developing Countries in the Asia Pacific Region," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(5), pages 144-156, September.
    4. Amin, Waqas & Xie, Shouhong & Rauf, Abdul, 2025. "Analyzing the interplay between money supply, mineral extraction, industrialization, and ecological footprint in latin America's global south: A symmetrical perspective," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    5. Waaje, Abdul & Roshid, Md Mustaqim & Islam, Sohidul & Chandra Bhowmik, Reday & Rahaman, Muhammad Abdur & Hassan, Md Mahedi, 2025. "Tourism, trade, energy, and economic development: Drivers of ecological footprint in the World’s top tourist destinations," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(3).
    6. Ayoub Zeraibi & Atif Jahanger & Muhammad Usman & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Mustafa Kamal, 2024. "The role of fiscal decentralization and technological innovations in curbing sulfur dioxide emissions: formulating SDGs policies for China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19659-19684, August.
    7. Luo, Heng & Sun, Ying, 2024. "The impact of energy efficiency on ecological footprint in the presence of EKC: Evidence from G20 countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 304(C).
    8. Egunjobi, T. Adenike & Akam, Darlington Uzoma, 2025. "The Role of Industrialization and Renewable Energy on Environmental Quality in Oil Exporting Sub-Saharan African Countries," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 13(2).
    9. Qiong Deng & Muhammad Usman & Muhammad Irfan & Mohammad Haseeb, 2025. "The role of financial inclusion and tourism in tackling environmental challenges of industrialization and energy consumption: Redesigning Sustainable Development Goals policies," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 3112-3139, August.
    10. repec:bcp:journl:v:9:y:2025:i:26:p:9113-9117 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Shubo Yang & Atif Jahanger & Muhammad Usman, 2025. "Natural resource endowment and urban green total factor productivity: “Resource gospel” or “resource curse”?," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 49(3), pages 3225-3247, August.
    12. Atif Jahanger & Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente & Ahmed Samour & Foday Joof & Mumtaz Ali & Turgut Tursoy, 2022. "Do Renewable Energy and the Real Estate Market Promote Environmental Quality in South Africa: Evidence from the Bootstrap ARDL Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Murshed, Muntasir & Saboori, Behnaz & Madaleno, Mara & Wang, Hong & Doğan, Buhari, 2022. "Exploring the nexuses between nuclear energy, renewable energy, and carbon dioxide emissions: The role of economic complexity in the G7 countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 664-674.
    2. Abdelaziz Boukhelkhal, 2022. "Energy use, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Africa: does the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis exist? New evidence from heterogeneous panel under cross-sectional dependence," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(11), pages 13083-13110, November.
    3. Rizwana Yasmeen & Ihtsham Ul Haq Padda & Xing Yao & Wasi Ul Hassan Shah & Muhammad Hafeez, 2022. "Agriculture, forestry, and environmental sustainability: the role of institutions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8722-8746, June.
    4. Jing Gao & Wen Xu & Lei Zhang, 2021. "Tourism, economic growth, and tourism-induced EKC hypothesis: evidence from the Mediterranean region," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(3), pages 1507-1529, March.
    5. Voumik, Liton Chandra & Ghosh, Smarnika & Rashid, Mamunur & Das, Mihir Kumar & Esquivias, Miguel Angel & Rojas, Omar, 2024. "The effect of geopolitical risk and green technology on load capacity factors in BRICS," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    6. Mehdi Ben Jebli & Montassar Kahia, 2020. "The interdependence between CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energies, and service development: evidence from 65 countries," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 193-212, September.
    7. Chandio, Abbas Ali & Ozdemir, Dicle & Gokmenoglu, Korhan K. & Usman, Muhammad & Jiang, Yuansheng, 2024. "Digital agriculture for sustainable development in China: The promise of computerization," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Sofien Tiba & Musavir Ul Habib, 2024. "Examining the Causal Linkages Between Nuclear Energy, Environment, and Economic Growth: An Application from the SAARC Economies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(2), pages 9699-9722, June.
    9. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Nasreen, Samia & Ahmed, Khalid & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2017. "Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 221-232.
    10. Jahanger, Atif & Hossain, Mohammad Razib & Usman, Muhammad & Chukwuma Onwe, Joshua, 2023. "Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: Does the mediating role of human capital exist?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Francisco García-Lillo & Eduardo Sánchez-García & Bartolomé Marco-Lajara & Pedro Seva-Larrosa, 2023. "Renewable Energies and Sustainable Development: A Bibliometric Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-22, January.
    12. Muhammad Sadiq & Syed Tauseef Hassan & Irfan Khan & Mohammad Mafizur Rahman, 2024. "Policy uncertainty, renewable energy, corruption and CO2 emissions nexus in BRICS-1 countries: a panel CS-ARDL approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 21595-21621, August.
    13. Omri, Anis, 2018. "Entrepreneurship, sectoral outputs and environmental improvement: International evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 46-55.
    14. Angeliki N. Menegaki, 2019. "The ARDL Method in the Energy-Growth Nexus Field; Best Implementation Strategies," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Lau, Lin-Sea & Choong, Chee-Keong & Ng, Cheong-Fatt & Liew, Feng-Mei & Ching, Suet-Ling, 2019. "Is nuclear energy clean? Revisit of Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis in OECD countries," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 12-20.
    16. Mamkhezri, Jamal, 2025. "Assessing price elasticity in US residential electricity consumption: A comparison of monthly and annual data with recession implications," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    17. Jiancheng, Xi & Boateng, Seth Acquah & Karikari, Frank Agyemang & Khan, Sana & Sackitey, Gabriel Mordzifa & Fumey, Michael Provide, 2026. "Financial markets and renewable energy transitions: Evidence from energy investment, domestic credit, market capitalisation and institutional quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 346(C).
    18. Waaje, Abdul & Roshid, Md Mustaqim & Islam, Sohidul & Chandra Bhowmik, Reday & Rahaman, Muhammad Abdur & Hassan, Md Mahedi, 2025. "Tourism, trade, energy, and economic development: Drivers of ecological footprint in the World’s top tourist destinations," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(3).
    19. Wenjing Zhang & Hengzhou Xu, 2017. "Exploring the causal relationship between carbon emissions and land urbanization quality in China using a panel data analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1445-1462, August.
    20. Kasman, Adnan & Duman, Yavuz Selman, 2015. "CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 97-103.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:17:p:6442-:d:905844. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.