IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i24p8366-d700474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomass Potential for Producing Power via Green Hydrogen

Author

Listed:
  • Nestor Sanchez

    (Group of Energy, Materials, and Environment, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Processes, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia 250001, Colombia)

  • David Rodríguez-Fontalvo

    (Group of Energy, Materials, and Environment, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Processes, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia 250001, Colombia)

  • Bernay Cifuentes

    (Faculty of Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Universidad de La Salle, Bogotá 111711, Colombia)

  • Nelly M. Cantillo

    (Group of Energy, Materials, and Environment, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Processes, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia 250001, Colombia)

  • Miguel Ángel Uribe Laverde

    (Group of Energy, Materials, and Environment, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Processes, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia 250001, Colombia)

  • Martha Cobo

    (Group of Energy, Materials, and Environment, Department of Chemical and Biochemical Processes, Faculty of Engineering, Universidad de La Sabana, Chia 250001, Colombia)

Abstract

Hydrogen (H 2 ) has become an important energy vector for mitigating the effects of climate change since it can be obtained from renewable sources and can be fed to fuel cells for producing power. Bioethanol can become a green H 2 source via Ethanol Steam Reforming (ESR) but several variables influence the power production in the fuel cell. Herein, we explored and optimized the main variables that affect this power production. The process includes biomass fermentation, bioethanol purification, H 2 production via ESR, syngas cleaning by a CO-removal reactor, and power production in a high temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cell (HT-PEMFC). Among the explored variables, the steam-to-ethanol molar ratio (S/E) employed in the ESR has the strongest influence on power production, process efficiency, and energy consumption. This effect is followed by other variables such as the inlet ethanol concentration and the ESR temperature. Although the CO-removal reactor did not show a significant effect on power production, it is key to increase the voltage on the fuel cell and consequently the power production. Optimization was carried out by the response surface methodology (RSM) and showed a maximum power of 0.07 kWh kg −1 of bioethanol with an efficiency of 17%, when ESR temperature is 700 °C. These values can be reached from different bioethanol sources as the S/E and CO-removal temperature are changed accordingly with the inlet ethanol concentration. Because there is a linear correlation between S/E and ethanol concentration, it is possible to select a proper S/E and CO-removal temperature to maximize the power generation in the HT-PEMFC via ESR. This study serves as a starting point to diversify the sources for producing H 2 and moving towards a H 2 -economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Nestor Sanchez & David Rodríguez-Fontalvo & Bernay Cifuentes & Nelly M. Cantillo & Miguel Ángel Uribe Laverde & Martha Cobo, 2021. "Biomass Potential for Producing Power via Green Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8366-:d:700474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8366/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8366/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jeffrey D. Sachs & Guido Schmidt-Traub & Mariana Mazzucato & Dirk Messner & Nebojsa Nakicenovic & Johan Rockström, 2019. "Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 2(9), pages 805-814, September.
    2. Geonhui Gwak & Minwoo Kim & Dohwan Kim & Muhammad Faizan & Kyeongmin Oh & Jaeseung Lee & Jaeyoo Choi & Nammin Lee & Kisung Lim & Hyunchul Ju, 2019. "Performance and Efficiency Analysis of an HT-PEMFC System with an Absorption Chiller for Tri-Generation Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Lu, Jie & Song, Fuyu & Liu, Hao & Chang, Chengcheng & Cheng, Yi & Wang, Haisong, 2021. "Production of high concentration bioethanol from reed by combined liquid hot water and sodium carbonate-oxygen pretreatment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Jin, Xianchun & Ma, Jiangshan & Song, Jianing & Liu, Gao-Qiang, 2021. "Promoted bioethanol production through fed-batch semisimultaneous saccharification and fermentation at a high biomass load of sodium carbonate-pretreated rice straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    5. Sanchez, Nestor & Ruiz, Ruth & Rödl, Anne & Cobo, Martha, 2021. "Technical and environmental analysis on the power production from residual biomass using hydrogen as energy vector," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 825-839.
    6. Sharma, Yogesh Chandra & Kumar, Ashutosh & Prasad, Ram & Upadhyay, Siddh Nath, 2017. "Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production: Latest and effective catalyst modification strategies to minimize carbonaceous deactivation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 89-103.
    7. Tahereh Soleymani Angili & Katarzyna Grzesik & Anne Rödl & Martin Kaltschmitt, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Bioethanol Production: A Review of Feedstock, Technology and Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sara Domínguez & Bernay Cifuentes & Felipe Bustamante & Nelly M. Cantillo & César L. Barraza-Botet & Martha Cobo, 2022. "On the Potential of Blue Hydrogen Production in Colombia: A Fossil Resource-Based Assessment for Low-Emission Hydrogen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Sebastián Mantilla & Diogo M. F. Santos, 2022. "Green and Blue Hydrogen Production: An Overview in Colombia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-21, November.
    3. Juan Félix González & Carmen María Álvez-Medina & Sergio Nogales-Delgado, 2023. "Biogas Steam Reforming in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Opportunities and Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-35, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekaterina Matus & Olga Sukhova & Ilyas Ismagilov & Mikhail Kerzhentsev & Olga Stonkus & Zinfer Ismagilov, 2021. "Hydrogen Production through Autothermal Reforming of Ethanol: Enhancement of Ni Catalyst Performance via Promotion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    2. Ida Kubiszewski & Kenneth Mulder & Diane Jarvis & Robert Costanza, 2022. "Toward better measurement of sustainable development and wellbeing: A small number of SDG indicators reliably predict life satisfaction," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(1), pages 139-148, February.
    3. Satinover, Scott J. & Schell, Dan & Borole, Abhijeet P., 2020. "Achieving high hydrogen productivities of 20 L/L-day via microbial electrolysis of corn stover fermentation products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    4. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    5. Paola Perez-Aleman & Tommaso Ferretti, 2023. "Creating innovation capabilities for improving global health: Inventing technology for neglected tropical diseases in Brazil," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 84-114, March.
    6. Mehmet Çağlar & Cem Gürler, 2022. "Sustainable Development Goals: A cluster analysis of worldwide countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8593-8624, June.
    7. Jan Anton van Zanten & Rob van Tulder, 2020. "Beyond COVID-19: Applying “SDG logics” for resilient transformations," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 3(4), pages 451-464, December.
    8. Reyes-Menendez, Ana & Clemente-Mediavilla, Jorge & Villagra, Nuria, 2023. "Understanding STI and SDG with artificial intelligence: A review and research agenda for entrepreneurial action," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Esther Cruz-Iglesias & Pilar Gil-Molina & Itziar Rekalde-Rodríguez, 2022. "A Navigation Chart for Sustainability for the Ocean i3 Educational Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    10. Virág, Doris & Wiedenhofer, Dominik & Baumgart, André & Matej, Sarah & Krausmann, Fridolin & Min, Jihoon & Rao, Narasimha D. & Haberl, Helmut, 2022. "How much infrastructure is required to support decent mobility for all? An exploratory assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    11. Eirini Triantafyllidou & Anastasia Zabaniotou, 2022. "From Theory to Praxis: ‘Go Sustainable Living’ Survey for Exploring Individuals Consciousness Level of Decision-Making and Action-Taking in Daily Life Towards a Green Citizenship," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    12. Youtang Zhang & Hagos Mesfin Berhe, 2022. "The Impact of Green Investment and Green Marketing on Business Performance: The Mediation Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Ethiopia’s Chinese Textile Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-24, March.
    13. Kristin Linnerud & Erling Holden & Morten Simonsen, 2021. "Closing the sustainable development gap: A global study of goal interactions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(4), pages 738-753, July.
    14. Elena Andriollo & Alberto Caimo & Laura Secco & Elena Pisani, 2021. "Collaborations in Environmental Initiatives for an Effective “Adaptive Governance” of Social–Ecological Systems: What Existing Literature Suggests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-29, July.
    15. Tahereh Soleymani Angili & Katarzyna Grzesik & Wojciech Jerzak, 2023. "Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Catalytic Intermediate Pyrolysis of Rapeseed Meal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Jonathan P. Truslove & Andrea B. Coulson & Muthi Nhlema & Emma Mbalame & Robert M. Kalin, 2020. "Reflecting SDG 6.1 in Rural Water Supply Tariffs: Considering ‘Affordability’ Versus ‘Operations and Maintenance Costs’ in Malawi," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Sara Domínguez & Bernay Cifuentes & Felipe Bustamante & Nelly M. Cantillo & César L. Barraza-Botet & Martha Cobo, 2022. "On the Potential of Blue Hydrogen Production in Colombia: A Fossil Resource-Based Assessment for Low-Emission Hydrogen," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Tulin Dzhengiz, 2020. "A Literature Review of Inter-Organizational Sustainability Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-52, June.
    19. Bernard Amadei, 2020. "A Systems Approach to Building Community Capacity and Resilience," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, October.
    20. Fekete, Alexander & Fuchs, Sven & Garschagen, Matthias & Hutter, Gérard & Klepp, Silja & Lüder, Catharina & Neise, Thomas & Sett, Dominic & von Elverfeldt, Kirsten & Wannewitz, Mia, 2022. "Adjustment or transformation? Disaster risk intervention examples from Austria, Indonesia, Kiribati and South Africa," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8366-:d:700474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.