IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v74y2017icp89-103.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production: Latest and effective catalyst modification strategies to minimize carbonaceous deactivation

Author

Listed:
  • Sharma, Yogesh Chandra
  • Kumar, Ashutosh
  • Prasad, Ram
  • Upadhyay, Siddh Nath

Abstract

Hydrogen is being contemplated as the future fuel in view of the abundant availability of hydrogen bearing substances in nature, its high energy content (120.7kJ/g), and its combustion without creating any environmental pollution. Pollution free sources for hydrogen generation and efficient conversion to useful energy are the two important factors controlling the development of hydrogen economy. Out of various liquid hydrogen sources, ethanol is a sustainable candidate because of its renewable nature, increasing availability, biodegradable nature, low toxicity, and ease of transport. It can be easily converted to a hydrogen rich mixture through catalytic steam reforming process. Further, ethanol steam reforming (ESR) is thermodynamically feasible and does not cause catalyst poisoning due to complete absence of S-impurities. However, the carbonaceous deposition during ESR is still an issue to make it sustainable for hydrogen generation. This review contains all parallel possible reactions besides the desired reactions, which can promote carbonaceous deposition over catalyst surface with respect to temperature. The role of operating conditions such as water and ethanol feed ratio and temperature with carbon generation were interrelated. The characterization of different carbon forms synthesized during ESR and the possible role of active catalyst into carbon synthesis mechanism was also considered. The contribution of precursor used for catalyst preparation, the role of active metals, the interaction between active metals for bimetallic catalyst, different kind of support prominently studied for ESR and their structural behaviors were also correlated. This review makes an attempt to critically summarize the recent strategies used to reduce the carbonaceous deactivation of catalyst during ESR on the basis of available literature survey. The focus of the review is catalyst deactivation due to carbonaceous deposition during reforming and possible strategies used to control the deactivation process during ESR.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharma, Yogesh Chandra & Kumar, Ashutosh & Prasad, Ram & Upadhyay, Siddh Nath, 2017. "Ethanol steam reforming for hydrogen production: Latest and effective catalyst modification strategies to minimize carbonaceous deactivation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 89-103.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:74:y:2017:i:c:p:89-103
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117302642
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayalur Chattanathan, Shyamsundar & Adhikari, Sushil & Abdoulmoumine, Nourredine, 2012. "A review on current status of hydrogen production from bio-oil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 2366-2372.
    2. Hou, Tengfei & Zhang, Shaoyin & Chen, Yongdong & Wang, Dazhi & Cai, Weijie, 2015. "Hydrogen production from ethanol reforming: Catalysts and reaction mechanism," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 132-148.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nestor Sanchez & David Rodríguez-Fontalvo & Bernay Cifuentes & Nelly M. Cantillo & Miguel Ángel Uribe Laverde & Martha Cobo, 2021. "Biomass Potential for Producing Power via Green Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    2. Ekaterina Matus & Olga Sukhova & Ilyas Ismagilov & Mikhail Kerzhentsev & Olga Stonkus & Zinfer Ismagilov, 2021. "Hydrogen Production through Autothermal Reforming of Ethanol: Enhancement of Ni Catalyst Performance via Promotion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Charisiou, N.D. & Italiano, C. & Pino, L. & Sebastian, V. & Vita, A. & Goula, M.A., 2020. "Hydrogen production via steam reforming of glycerol over Rh/γ-Al2O3 catalysts modified with CeO2, MgO or La2O3," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 908-925.
    4. Deng, Yimin & Li, Shuo & Appels, Lise & Zhang, Huili & Sweygers, Nick & Baeyens, Jan & Dewil, Raf, 2023. "Steam reforming of ethanol by non-noble metal catalysts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Wang, Yishuang & Liang, Defang & Wang, Chunsheng & Chen, Mingqiang & Tang, Zhiyuan & Hu, Jiaxin & Yang, Zhonglian & Zhang, Han & Wang, Jun & Liu, Shaomin, 2020. "Influence of calcination temperature of Ni/Attapulgite on hydrogen production by steam reforming ethanol," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 597-611.
    6. Satinover, Scott J. & Schell, Dan & Borole, Abhijeet P., 2020. "Achieving high hydrogen productivities of 20 L/L-day via microbial electrolysis of corn stover fermentation products," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    7. Łukajtis, Rafał & Hołowacz, Iwona & Kucharska, Karolina & Glinka, Marta & Rybarczyk, Piotr & Przyjazny, Andrzej & Kamiński, Marian, 2018. "Hydrogen production from biomass using dark fermentation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 665-694.
    8. Vincenzo Palma & Concetta Ruocco & Eugenio Meloni & Antonio Ricca, 2017. "Influence of Catalytic Formulation and Operative Conditions on Coke Deposition over CeO 2 -SiO 2 Based Catalysts for Ethanol Reforming," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    9. Greluk, Magdalena & Rotko, Marek & Turczyniak-Surdacka, Sylwia, 2020. "Enhanced catalytic performance of La2O3 promoted Co/CeO2 and Ni/CeO2 catalysts for effective hydrogen production by ethanol steam reforming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 378-395.
    10. Eugenio Meloni & Marco Martino & Giuseppina Iervolino & Concetta Ruocco & Simona Renda & Giovanni Festa & Vincenzo Palma, 2022. "The Route from Green H 2 Production through Bioethanol Reforming to CO 2 Catalytic Conversion: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-36, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Guanyi & Tao, Junyu & Liu, Caixia & Yan, Beibei & Li, Wanqing & Li, Xiangping, 2017. "Hydrogen production via acetic acid steam reforming: A critical review on catalysts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1091-1098.
    2. Ochoa, Aitor & Bilbao, Javier & Gayubo, Ana G. & Castaño, Pedro, 2020. "Coke formation and deactivation during catalytic reforming of biomass and waste pyrolysis products: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    3. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part II," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1446-1466.
    4. Mostafa Rezaei & Ali Mostafaeipour & Mojtaba Qolipour & Hamid-Reza Arabnia, 2018. "Hydrogen production using wind energy from sea water: A case study on Southern and Northern coasts of Iran," Energy & Environment, , vol. 29(3), pages 333-357, May.
    5. Zhu, Min & Chen, Shiyi & Soomro, Ahsanullah & Hu, Jun & Sun, Zhao & Ma, Shiwei & Xiang, Wenguo, 2018. "Effects of supports on reduction activity and carbon deposition of iron oxide for methane chemical looping hydrogen generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 912-921.
    6. Deng, Yimin & Li, Shuo & Appels, Lise & Zhang, Huili & Sweygers, Nick & Baeyens, Jan & Dewil, Raf, 2023. "Steam reforming of ethanol by non-noble metal catalysts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part I," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1427-1445.
    8. Nasir Uddin, Md. & Daud, W.M.A. Wan & Abbas, Hazim F., 2013. "Potential hydrogen and non-condensable gases production from biomass pyrolysis: Insights into the process variables," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 204-224.
    9. No, Soo-Young, 2014. "Application of bio-oils from lignocellulosic biomass to transportation, heat and power generation—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 1108-1125.
    10. Ekaterina Matus & Olga Sukhova & Ilyas Ismagilov & Mikhail Kerzhentsev & Olga Stonkus & Zinfer Ismagilov, 2021. "Hydrogen Production through Autothermal Reforming of Ethanol: Enhancement of Ni Catalyst Performance via Promotion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Nabgan, Walid & Tuan Abdullah, Tuan Amran & Mat, Ramli & Nabgan, Bahador & Gambo, Yahya & Ibrahim, Maryam & Ahmad, Arshad & Jalil, Aishah Abdul & Triwahyono, Sugeng & Saeh, Ibrahim, 2017. "Renewable hydrogen production from bio-oil derivative via catalytic steam reforming: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 347-357.
    12. Zhao, Jiafei & Song, Yongchen & Lim, Xin-Le & Lam, Wei-Haur, 2017. "Opportunities and challenges of gas hydrate policies with consideration of environmental impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 875-885.
    13. Chen, Wei-Hsin & Lin, Bo-Jhih, 2016. "Characteristics of products from the pyrolysis of oil palm fiber and its pellets in nitrogen and carbon dioxide atmospheres," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 569-578.
    14. Spallina, V. & Matturro, G. & Ruocco, C. & Meloni, E. & Palma, V. & Fernandez, E. & Melendez, J. & Pacheco Tanaka, A.D. & Viviente Sole, J.L. & van Sint Annaland, M. & Gallucci, F., 2018. "Direct route from ethanol to pure hydrogen through autothermal reforming in a membrane reactor: Experimental demonstration, reactor modelling and design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 666-681.
    15. Mirkouei, Amin & Haapala, Karl R. & Sessions, John & Murthy, Ganti S., 2017. "A review and future directions in techno-economic modeling and optimization of upstream forest biomass to bio-oil supply chains," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 15-35.
    16. Resende, K.A. & Ávila-Neto, C.N. & Rabelo-Neto, R.C. & Noronha, F.B. & Hori, C.E., 2015. "Thermodynamic analysis and reaction routes of steam reforming of bio-oil aqueous fraction," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 166-176.
    17. Hou, Tengfei & Zhang, Shaoyin & Chen, Yongdong & Wang, Dazhi & Cai, Weijie, 2015. "Hydrogen production from ethanol reforming: Catalysts and reaction mechanism," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 132-148.
    18. Esteban-Díez, G. & Gil, María V. & Pevida, C. & Chen, D. & Rubiera, F., 2016. "Effect of operating conditions on the sorption enhanced steam reforming of blends of acetic acid and acetone as bio-oil model compounds," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 579-590.
    19. Lifita N. Tande & Erik Resendiz-Mora & Valerie Dupont, 2021. "Bioh 2 , Heat and Power from Palm Empty Fruit Bunch via Pyrolysis-Autothermal Reforming: Plant Simulation, Experiments, and CO 2 Mitigation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Li, Kaiyu & Gao, Yitong & Zhang, Shengan & Liu, Guilian, 2022. "Study on the energy efficiency of bioethanol-based liquid hydrogen production process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PC).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:74:y:2017:i:c:p:89-103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.