IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v14y2021i24p8248-d697373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Method for Designing Robust and Energy Efficient Railway Schedules

Author

Listed:
  • Franciszek Restel

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Łukasz Wolniewicz

    (Department of Technical Systems Operation and Maintenance, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland)

  • Matea Mikulčić

    (Department of Railway Transport, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia)

Abstract

The robustness of the timetable is a sensitive issue in the daily realization of railway operations. As shown in the paper, robustness is a function of time reserves that helps to prevent unscheduled stops resulting from traffic disruptions and causing a higher energy consumption. The correct handling of time reserves while scheduling is a multidimensional issue, and it has a significant influence on the energy consumption of railway traffic. Therefore, the paper aims to show a simulation-based method, taking into account failure occurring probabilities and their consequences to get an acceptable level of robustness, that can be quantified by the probability of no delay propagation. This paper presents a method for the addition of time margins to the railway timetable. The iterative time buffer adding method is based on operational data as a knowledge source, to achieve the punctuality target. It was verified on a real railway line. An analysis of energy consumption for unscheduled train stops depending on the added buffer time was conducted after the literature review and the presentation of the evaluation model. The paper ends with discussion of the results and conclusions.

Suggested Citation

  • Franciszek Restel & Łukasz Wolniewicz & Matea Mikulčić, 2021. "Method for Designing Robust and Energy Efficient Railway Schedules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-12, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8248-:d:697373
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8248/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/24/8248/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Pengling & Goverde, Rob M.P., 2019. "Multi-train trajectory optimization for energy-efficient timetabling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(2), pages 621-635.
    2. Yang, Xin & Chen, Anthony & Ning, Bin & Tang, Tao, 2016. "A stochastic model for the integrated optimization on metro timetable and speed profile with uncertain train mass," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 424-445.
    3. Ping Huang & Chao Wen & Qiyuan Peng & Javad Lessan & Liping Fu & Chaozhe Jiang, 2019. "A data-driven time supplements allocation model for train operations on high-speed railways," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 140-157, April.
    4. Valentina Cacchiani & Paolo Toth, 2018. "Robust Train Timetabling," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Ralf Borndörfer & Torsten Klug & Leonardo Lamorgese & Carlo Mannino & Markus Reuther & Thomas Schlec (ed.), Handbook of Optimization in the Railway Industry, chapter 0, pages 93-115, Springer.
    5. Goverde, Rob M.P., 2007. "Railway timetable stability analysis using max-plus system theory," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 179-201, February.
    6. Xiong Yang & Yafei Hou & Li Li, 2020. "Buffer time allocation according to train delay expectation at stations," International Journal of Rail Transportation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 249-263, July.
    7. Lukas Pröhl & Harald Aschemann & Roberto Palacin, 2021. "The Influence of Operating Strategies regarding an Energy Optimized Driving Style for Electrically Driven Railway Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Jovanović, Predrag & Kecman, Pavle & Bojović, Nebojša & Mandić, Dragomir, 2017. "Optimal allocation of buffer times to increase train schedule robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 44-54.
    9. Alejandro Cunillera & Adrián Fernández-Rodríguez & Asunción P. Cucala & Antonio Fernández-Cardador & Maria Carmen Falvo, 2020. "Assessment of the Worthwhileness of Efficient Driving in Railway Systems with High-Receptivity Power Supplies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    10. Lee, Yusin & Lu, Li-Sin & Wu, Mei-Ling & Lin, Dung-Ying, 2017. "Balance of efficiency and robustness in passenger railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 142-156.
    11. Vromans, Michiel J.C.M. & Dekker, Rommert & Kroon, Leo G., 2006. "Reliability and heterogeneity of railway services," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(2), pages 647-665, July.
    12. Zhongbei Tian & Ning Zhao & Stuart Hillmansen & Shuai Su & Chenglin Wen, 2020. "Traction Power Substation Load Analysis with Various Train Operating Styles and Substation Fault Modes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Yuan, Jianxin & Hansen, Ingo A., 2007. "Optimizing capacity utilization of stations by estimating knock-on train delays," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 202-217, February.
    14. Hassini, Elkafi & Verma, Manish, 2016. "Disruption risk management in railroad networks: An optimization-based methodology and a case studyAuthor-Name: Azad, Nader," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 70-88.
    15. Yang, Lixing & Li, Keping & Gao, Ziyou & Li, Xiang, 2012. "Optimizing trains movement on a railway network," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 619-633.
    16. Vansteenwegen, P. & Oudheusden, D. Van, 2006. "Developing railway timetables which guarantee a better service," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 337-350, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mateusz Zając, 2022. "The Analysis of Selected Factors Improving the Cargo Susceptibility to Modal Shift," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    2. Artur Kierzkowski & Agnieszka A. Tubis, 2023. "Transportation Systems Modeling, Simulation and Analysis with Reference to Energy Supplying," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-6, April.
    3. Mihaela Popescu, 2022. "Energy Efficiency in Electric Transportation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-5, November.
    4. Solinen, Emma & Palmqvist, Carl-William, 2023. "Development of new railway timetabling rules for increased robustness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 198-208.
    5. Sahil Bhagat & Jacopo Bongiorno & Andrea Mariscotti, 2023. "Influence of Infrastructure and Operating Conditions on Energy Performance of DC Transit Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Franciszek Restel & Szymon Mateusz Haładyn, 2022. "The Railway Timetable Evaluation Method in Terms of Operational Robustness against Overloads of the Power Supply System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jovanović, Predrag & Kecman, Pavle & Bojović, Nebojša & Mandić, Dragomir, 2017. "Optimal allocation of buffer times to increase train schedule robustness," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(1), pages 44-54.
    2. Lusby, Richard M. & Larsen, Jesper & Bull, Simon, 2018. "A survey on robustness in railway planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 1-15.
    3. M. Shakibayifar & A. Sheikholeslami & F. Corman & E. Hassannayebi, 2020. "An integrated rescheduling model for minimizing train delays in the case of line blockage," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 59-87, March.
    4. Dewilde, Thijs & Sels, Peter & Cattrysse, Dirk & Vansteenwegen, Pieter, 2014. "Improving the robustness in railway station areas," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 276-286.
    5. Jens Parbo & Otto Anker Nielsen & Carlo Giacomo Prato, 2016. "Passenger Perspectives in Railway Timetabling: A Literature Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 500-526, July.
    6. Liping Ge & Stefan Voß & Lin Xie, 2022. "Robustness and disturbances in public transport," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 191-261, March.
    7. Szymon Haładyn, 2021. "The Problem of Train Scheduling in the Context of the Load on the Power Supply Infrastructure. A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Canca, David & Barrena, Eva, 2018. "The integrated rolling stock circulation and depot location problem in railway rapid transit systems," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 115-138.
    9. Li, Jiajie & Bai, Yun & Chen, Yao & Yang, Lingling & Wang, Qian, 2022. "A two-stage stochastic optimization model for integrated tram timetable and speed control with uncertain dwell times," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    10. Harshad Khadilkar, 2017. "Data-Enabled Stochastic Modeling for Evaluating Schedule Robustness of Railway Networks," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(4), pages 1161-1176, November.
    11. Högdahl, Johan & Bohlin, Markus & Fröidh, Oskar, 2019. "A combined simulation-optimization approach for minimizing travel time and delays in railway timetables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 192-212.
    12. Flurin S. Hänseler & Nicholas A. Molyneaux & Michel Bierlaire, 2017. "Estimation of Pedestrian Origin-Destination Demand in Train Stations," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 981-997, August.
    13. Zhichao Cao & Zhenzhou Yuan & Silin Zhang, 2016. "Performance Analysis of Stop-Skipping Scheduling Plans in Rail Transit under Time-Dependent Demand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-23, July.
    14. Vansteenwegen, Pieter & Dewilde, Thijs & Burggraeve, Sofie & Cattrysse, Dirk, 2016. "An iterative approach for reducing the impact of infrastructure maintenance on the performance of railway systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(1), pages 39-53.
    15. Zhang, Yongxiang & D'Ariano, Andrea & He, Bisheng & Peng, Qiyuan, 2019. "Microscopic optimization model and algorithm for integrating train timetabling and track maintenance task scheduling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 237-278.
    16. Ye, Hongbo & Liu, Ronghui, 2016. "A multiphase optimal control method for multi-train control and scheduling on railway lines," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 377-393.
    17. Mariano Gallo & Marilisa Botte & Antonio Ruggiero & Luca D’Acierno, 2020. "A Simulation Approach for Optimising Energy-Efficient Driving Speed Profiles in Metro Lines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-17, November.
    18. Shi, Feng & Zhou, Zhao & Yao, Jia & Huang, Helai, 2012. "Incorporating transfer reliability into equilibrium analysis of railway passenger flow," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(2), pages 378-385.
    19. Nikola Bešinović & Rob M. P. Goverde, 2019. "Stable and robust train routing in station areas with balanced infrastructure capacity occupation," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 211-236, August.
    20. Cacchiani, Valentina & Qi, Jianguo & Yang, Lixing, 2020. "Robust optimization models for integrated train stop planning and timetabling with passenger demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 1-29.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:24:p:8248-:d:697373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.