IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v12y2019i13p2612-d246377.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gasification of Waste Cooking Oil to Syngas by Thermal Arc Plasma

Author

Listed:
  • Andrius Tamošiūnas

    (Plasma Processing Laboratory, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Dovilė Gimžauskaitė

    (Plasma Processing Laboratory, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Mindaugas Aikas

    (Plasma Processing Laboratory, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Rolandas Uscila

    (Plasma Processing Laboratory, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Marius Praspaliauskas

    (Laboratory of Heat Equipment Research and Testing, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

  • Justas Eimontas

    (Laboratory of Combustion Processes, Lithuanian Energy Institute, Breslaujos str. 3, LT-44403 Kaunas, Lithuania)

Abstract

The depletion and usage of fossil fuels causes environmental issues and alternative fuels and technologies are urgently required. Therefore, thermal arc water vapor plasma for a fast and robust waste/biomass treatment is an alternative to the syngas method. Waste cooking oil (WCO) can be used as an alternative potential feedstock for syngas production. The goal of this experimental study was to conduct experiments gasifying waste cooking oil to syngas. The WCO was characterized in order to examine its properties and composition in the conversion process. The WCO gasification system was quantified in terms of the produced gas concentration, the H 2 /CO ratio, the lower heating value (LHV), the carbon conversion efficiency (CCE), the energy conversion efficiency (ECE), the specific energy requirements (SER), and the tar content in the syngas. The best gasification process efficiency was obtained at the gasifying agent-to-feedstock (S/WCO) ratio of 2.33. At this ratio, the highest concentration of hydrogen and carbon monoxide, the H 2 /CO ratio, the LHV, the CCE, the ECE, the SER, and the tar content were 47.9%, 22.42%, 2.14, 12.7 MJ/Nm 3 , 41.3% 85.42%, 196.2 kJ/mol (or 1.8 kWh/kg), and 0.18 g/Nm 3 , respectively. As a general conclusion, it can be stated that the thermal arc-plasma method used in this study can be effectively used for waste cooking oil gasification to high quality syngas with a rather low content of tars.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrius Tamošiūnas & Dovilė Gimžauskaitė & Mindaugas Aikas & Rolandas Uscila & Marius Praspaliauskas & Justas Eimontas, 2019. "Gasification of Waste Cooking Oil to Syngas by Thermal Arc Plasma," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:13:p:2612-:d:246377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/13/2612/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/12/13/2612/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tamošiūnas, Andrius & Gimžauskaitė, Dovilė & Uscila, Rolandas & Aikas, Mindaugas, 2019. "Thermal arc plasma gasification of waste glycerol to syngas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Jeeban Poudel & Sujeeta Karki & Nawaraj Sanjel & Malesh Shah & Sea Cheon Oh, 2017. "Comparison of Biodiesel Obtained from Virgin Cooking Oil and Waste Cooking Oil Using Supercritical and Catalytic Transesterification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Laureano Costarrosa & David Eduardo Leiva-Candia & Antonio José Cubero-Atienza & Juan José Ruiz & M. Pilar Dorado, 2018. "Optimization of the Transesterification of Waste Cooking Oil with Mg-Al Hydrotalcite Using Response Surface Methodology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-9, January.
    4. Han, Jun & Kim, Heejoon, 2008. "The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: An overview," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 397-416, February.
    5. Yaakob, Zahira & Mohammad, Masita & Alherbawi, Mohammad & Alam, Zahangir & Sopian, Kamaruzaman, 2013. "Overview of the production of biodiesel from Waste cooking oil," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 184-193.
    6. Nanda, Sonil & Azargohar, Ramin & Dalai, Ajay K. & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2015. "An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 925-941.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Masaaki Okubo, 2019. "Special Issue on Plasma Processes for Renewable Energy Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-4, November.
    2. Fang, Neng & Li, Zhengqi & Liu, Shuxuan & Xie, Cheng & Zeng, Lingyan & Chen, Zhichao, 2021. "Experimental air/particle flow characteristics of an 80,000 Nm3/h fly ash entrained-flow gasifier with different multi-burner arrangements," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PB).
    3. Chu, Chu & Wang, Ping & Boré, Abdoulaye & Ma, Wenchao & Chen, Guanyi & Wang, Pan, 2023. "Thermal plasma co-gasification of polyvinylchloride and biomass mixtures under steam atmospheres: Gasification characteristics and chlorine release behavior," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    4. Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Park, Young-Kwon & Fallahi, Alireza & Sulaiman, Alawi & Ranjbari, Meisam & Rahnama, Hassan & Aghbashl, 2022. "Environmental life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    5. Chu, C. & Boré, A. & Liu, X.W. & Cui, J.C. & Wang, P. & Liu, X. & Chen, G.Y. & Liu, B. & Ma, W.C. & Lou, Z.Y. & Tao, Y. & Bary, A., 2022. "Modeling the impact of some independent parameters on the syngas characteristics during plasma gasification of municipal solid waste using artificial neural network and stepwise linear regression meth," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Dorota Burchart-Korol & Magdalena Gazda-Grzywacz & Katarzyna Zarębska, 2020. "Research and Prospects for the Development of Alternative Fuels in the Transport Sector in Poland: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    7. Sang Yeop Lee & Se Won Park & Md Tanvir Alam & Yean Ouk Jeong & Yong-Chil Seo & Hang Seok Choi, 2020. "Studies on the Gasification Performance of Sludge Cake Pre-Treated by Hydrothermal Carbonization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Nogales-Delgado & José María Encinar & Juan Félix González, 2019. "Safflower Biodiesel: Improvement of its Oxidative Stability by Using BHA and TBHQ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Jemima Romola, C.V. & Meganaharshini, M. & Rigby, S.P. & Ganesh Moorthy, I. & Shyam Kumar, R. & Karthikumar, Sankar, 2021. "A comprehensive review of the selection of natural and synthetic antioxidants to enhance the oxidative stability of biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    3. Mansir, Nasar & Teo, Siow Hwa & Rashid, Umer & Saiman, Mohd Izham & Tan, Yen Ping & Alsultan, G. Abdulkareem & Taufiq-Yap, Yun Hin, 2018. "Modified waste egg shell derived bifunctional catalyst for biodiesel production from high FFA waste cooking oil. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 3645-3655.
    4. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Singh, Paramvir & Varun, & Chauhan, S.R., 2016. "Carbonyl and aromatic hydrocarbon emissions from diesel engine exhaust using different feedstock: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 269-291.
    6. Neves, Renato Cruz & Klein, Bruno Colling & da Silva, Ricardo Justino & Rezende, Mylene Cristina Alves Ferreira & Funke, Axel & Olivarez-Gómez, Edgardo & Bonomi, Antonio & Maciel-Filho, Rubens, 2020. "A vision on biomass-to-liquids (BTL) thermochemical routes in integrated sugarcane biorefineries for biojet fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    7. Mandolesi de Araújo, Carlos Daniel & de Andrade, Claudia Cristina & de Souza e Silva, Erika & Dupas, Francisco Antonio, 2013. "Biodiesel production from used cooking oil: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 445-452.
    8. Fábio Antônio do Nascimento Setúbal & Sérgio de Souza Custódio Filho & Newton Sure Soeiro & Alexandre Luiz Amarante Mesquita & Marcus Vinicius Alves Nunes, 2022. "Force Identification from Vibration Data by Response Surface and Random Forest Regression Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Mohammad Anwar & Mohammad G. Rasul & Nanjappa Ashwath & Md Mofijur Rahman, 2018. "Optimisation of Second-Generation Biodiesel Production from Australian Native Stone Fruit Oil Using Response Surface Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Nirmala, N. & Dawn, S.S., 2021. "Optimization of Chlorella variabilis. MK039712.1 lipid transesterification using Response Surface Methodology and analytical characterization of biodiesel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1663-1673.
    11. Mostafaei, Mostafa & Javadikia, Hossein & Naderloo, Leila, 2016. "Modeling the effects of ultrasound power and reactor dimension on the biodiesel production yield: Comparison of prediction abilities between response surface methodology (RSM) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(P1), pages 626-636.
    12. Miranda, Amanda Carvalho & da Silva Filho, Silvério Catureba & Tambourgi, Elias Basile & CurveloSantana, José Carlos & Vanalle, Rosangela Maria & Guerhardt, Flávio, 2018. "Analysis of the costs and logistics of biodiesel production from used cooking oil in the metropolitan region of Campinas (Brazil)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 373-379.
    13. Asadullah, Mohammad, 2014. "Biomass gasification gas cleaning for downstream applications: A comparative critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 118-132.
    14. Singh, Renu & Shukla, Ashish, 2014. "A review on methods of flue gas cleaning from combustion of biomass," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 854-864.
    15. Gabriele Calì & Paolo Deiana & Claudia Bassano & Simone Meloni & Enrico Maggio & Michele Mascia & Alberto Pettinau, 2020. "Syngas Production, Clean-Up and Wastewater Management in a Demo-Scale Fixed-Bed Updraft Biomass Gasification Unit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Mohamed, Usama & Zhao, Yingjie & Huang, Yi & Cui, Yang & Shi, Lijuan & Li, Congming & Pourkashanian, Mohamed & Wei, Guoqiang & Yi, Qun & Nimmo, William, 2020. "Sustainability evaluation of biomass direct gasification using chemical looping technology for power generation with and w/o CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    17. Al-Rahbi, Amal S. & Williams, Paul T., 2017. "Hydrogen-rich syngas production and tar removal from biomass gasification using sacrificial tyre pyrolysis char," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 501-509.
    18. Nzihou, Ange & Flamant, Gilles & Stanmore, Brian, 2012. "Synthetic fuels from biomass using concentrated solar energy – A review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 121-131.
    19. Moreira, Rui & Bimbela, Fernando & Gandía, Luis M. & Ferreira, Abel & Sánchez, Jose Luis & Portugal, António, 2021. "Oxidative steam reforming of glycerol. A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    20. Stafford, W. & De Lange, W. & Nahman, A. & Chunilall, V. & Lekha, P. & Andrew, J. & Johakimu, J. & Sithole, B. & Trotter, D., 2020. "Forestry biorefineries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 461-475.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:12:y:2019:i:13:p:2612-:d:246377. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.