IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v154y2020icp461-475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forestry biorefineries

Author

Listed:
  • Stafford, W.
  • De Lange, W.
  • Nahman, A.
  • Chunilall, V.
  • Lekha, P.
  • Andrew, J.
  • Johakimu, J.
  • Sithole, B.
  • Trotter, D.

Abstract

All materials, chemicals and fuels made from fossil fuels can be made from sustainably sourced biomass. Biorefineries are key infrastructure developments needed to unlock the value from biomass and accelerate the transition to a Bioeconomy. The Forestry, Timber, Pulp & Paper industry produces lumber, pulp and paper bulk commodities to market. However, there are notable value-adding opportunities for Forestry biorefineries, since about 50% of the harvested tree biomass ends up as residues and waste. In order to assess the opportunity for Forestry biorefineries, this paper reviewed the various processing pathways, technologies and products that can be produced from wood residues and wastes from the FTPP industry (sawdust & offcuts, bark, leaves, sludge, black liquor, dregs and ash). A total of 129 chemical, thermochemical, biological and mechanical processing pathways were identified to generate 78 different unique products. We assessed the technical maturity of these processing pathways in terms of the technology readiness level and evaluated the market potential of these products to identify and classify Forestry biorefinery products as: true commodities, pseudo-commodities, fine chemicals and speciality chemicals. This study provides strategic focus for the development of Forestry biorefineries by distinguishing between un-established markets and lack of technology or innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Stafford, W. & De Lange, W. & Nahman, A. & Chunilall, V. & Lekha, P. & Andrew, J. & Johakimu, J. & Sithole, B. & Trotter, D., 2020. "Forestry biorefineries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 461-475.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:154:y:2020:i:c:p:461-475
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120301828
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rolf Meyer, 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-32, June.
    2. Nanda, Sonil & Azargohar, Ramin & Dalai, Ajay K. & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2015. "An assessment on the sustainability of lignocellulosic biomass for biorefining," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 925-941.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Clauser, Nicolás M. & Felissia, Fernando E. & Area, María C. & Vallejos, María E., 2021. "A framework for the design and analysis of integrated multi-product biorefineries from agricultural and forestry wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Sekoai, Patrick T. & Chunilall, Viren & Msele, Kwanele & Buthelezi, Lindiswa & Johakimu, Jonas & Andrew, Jerome & Zungu, Manqoba & Moloantoa, Karabelo & Maningi, Nontuthuko & Habimana, Olivier & Swart, 2023. "Biowaste biorefineries in South Africa: Current status, opportunities, and research and development needs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Pio, D.T. & Tarelho, L.A.C. & Pinto, P.C.R., 2020. "Gasification-based biorefinery integration in the pulp and paper industry: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    4. Furszyfer Del Rio, Dylan D. & Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Griffiths, Steve & Bazilian, Morgan & Kim, Jinsoo & Foley, Aoife M. & Rooney, David, 2022. "Decarbonizing the pulp and paper industry: A critical and systematic review of sociotechnical developments and policy options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Liu, Xu & Guo, Yang & Dasgupta, Anish & He, Haoran & Xu, Donghai & Guan, Qingqing, 2022. "Algal bio-oil refinery: A review of heterogeneously catalyzed denitrogenation and demetallization reactions for renewable process," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 627-650.
    6. Louw, Jeanne & Dogbe, Eunice S. & Yang, Bin & Görgens, Johann F., 2023. "Prioritisation of biomass-derived products for biorefineries based on economic feasibility: A review on the comparability of techno-economic assessment results," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruxandra Bejinaru & Cristian Valentin Hapenciuc & Iulian Condratov & Pavel Stanciu, 2018. "The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 583-583, August.
    2. Erika Palmer & Robert Burton & Cecilia Haskins, 2020. "A Systems Engineering Framework for Bioeconomic Transitions in a Sustainable Development Goal Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-12, August.
    3. Sven Wydra, 2019. "Value Chains for Industrial Biotechnology in the Bioeconomy-Innovation System Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Xuezhou Wen & Daniel Quacoe & Dinah Quacoe & Kingsley Appiah & Bertha Ada Danso, 2019. "Analysis on Bioeconomy’s Contribution to GDP: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Nora Szarka & Laura García Laverde & Daniela Thrän & Orest Kiyko & Mykhailo Ilkiv & Danka Moravčíková & Eva Cudlínová & Miloslav Lapka & Nóra Hatvani & Ákos Koós & Aleksandra Luks & Ignacio Martín Jim, 2023. "Stakeholder Engagement in the Co-Design of Regional Bioeconomy Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-37, April.
    6. Delia-Elena Diaconașu & Ionel Bostan & Cristina Căutișanu & Irina Chiriac, 2022. "Insights into the Sustainable Development of the Bioeconomy at the European Level, in the Context of the Desired Clean Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    7. Azargohar, Ramin & Nanda, Sonil & Kang, Kang & Bond, Toby & Karunakaran, Chithra & Dalai, Ajay K. & Kozinski, Janusz A., 2019. "Effects of bio-additives on the physicochemical properties and mechanical behavior of canola hull fuel pellets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 296-307.
    8. Andrew M. Neill & Cathal O’Donoghue & Jane C. Stout, 2020. "A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Fasahati, Peyman & Liu, J. Jay & Ohlrogge, John B. & Saffron, Christopher M., 2019. "Process design and economics for production of advanced biofuels from genetically modified lipid-producing sorghum," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 1459-1470.
    10. Leire Barañano & Naroa Garbisu & Itziar Alkorta & Andrés Araujo & Carlos Garbisu, 2021. "Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    11. Tévécia Ronzon & Susanne Iost & George Philippidis, 2022. "Has the European Union entered a bioeconomy transition? Combining an output-based approach with a shift-share analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8195-8217, June.
    12. Stefan Bößner & Francis X. Johnson & Zoha Shawoo, 2020. "Governing the Bioeconomy: What Role for International Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Juha Peltomaa, 2018. "Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    14. Durwin H.J. Lynch & Pim Klaassen & Lan van Wassenaer & Jacqueline E.W. Broerse, 2020. "Constructing the Public in Roadmapping the Transition to a Bioeconomy: A Case Study from the Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Chai, Siu Yeng & Abbasiliasi, Sahar & Lee, Chee Keong & Ibrahim, Tengku Azmi Tengku & Kadkhodaei, Saeid & Mohamed, Mohd Shamzi & Hashim, Rokiah & Tan, Joo Shun, 2018. "Extraction of fresh banana waste juice as non-cellulosic and non-food renewable feedstock for direct lipase production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 431-436.
    16. Luke Kelleher & Maeve Henchion & Eoin O’Neill, 2019. "Policy Coherence and the Transition to a Bioeconomy: The Case of Ireland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    17. Wądrzyk, Mariusz & Janus, Rafał & Lewandowski, Marek & Magdziarz, Aneta, 2021. "On mechanism of lignin decomposition – Investigation using microscale techniques: Py-GC-MS, Py-FT-IR and TGA," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 942-952.
    18. Milão, Raquel de Freitas Dias & Carminati, Hudson B. & Araújo, Ofélia de Queiroz F. & de Medeiros, José Luiz, 2019. "Thermodynamic, financial and resource assessments of a large-scale sugarcane-biorefinery: Prelude of full bioenergy carbon capture and storage scenario," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1-1.
    19. Tobias Stern & Ursula Ploll & Raphael Spies & Peter Schwarzbauer & Franziska Hesser & Lea Ranacher, 2018. "Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria—An Explorative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    20. Lena Jarosch & Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Matthias Finkbeiner & Daniela Thrän, 2020. "A Regional Socio-Economic Life Cycle Assessment of a Bioeconomy Value Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:154:y:2020:i:c:p:461-475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.