IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v11y2018i8p2095-d163342.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Site Selection of Hybrid Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Systems in Greece Incorporating Environmental Impact Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Eva Loukogeorgaki

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece)

  • Dimitra G. Vagiona

    (Department of Spatial Planning and Development, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece)

  • Margarita Vasileiou

    (Delfii Partners & Company, Athens 10562, Greece)

Abstract

This paper presents a methodological framework for evaluating marine areas in Greece for the purpose of identifying the most adequate sites for Hybrid Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Systems (HOWiWaES), with special focus on the HOWiWaES’ environmental impact assessment evaluation. Nine evaluation criteria that reflect various environmental, economic, technical and socio-political aspects are considered, including Wind Velocity (WV), Wave Energy Potential (WEP), Water Depth (WD), Distance from Shore (DS), Connection to Local Electrical Grid (CLEG), Population Served (PS), Shipping Density (SD), Distance from Ports (DP) and Environmental Performance Value (EPV). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is performed to hierarchically rank twelve predefined siting alternatives. Questionnaires are used to collect information on pairwise comparisons of the evaluation criteria from a group of stakeholders/experts. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are used as a metric tool for pairwise comparisons of each siting alternative with respect to the first eight evaluation criteria, while the last criterion is assessed through the development of an innovative environmental impact assessment tool. The results indicate that WV, WEP and EPV present the evaluation criteria with the highest relative significance, while PS, DP and SD correspond to less influencing criteria. The proposed methodology can be easily applied to other countries worldwide for supporting socially accepted siting of HOWiWaES.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva Loukogeorgaki & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Margarita Vasileiou, 2018. "Site Selection of Hybrid Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Systems in Greece Incorporating Environmental Impact Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2095-:d:163342
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/11/8/2095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cradden, L. & Kalogeri, C. & Barrios, I. Martinez & Galanis, G. & Ingram, D. & Kallos, G., 2016. "Multi-criteria site selection for offshore renewable energy platforms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(P1), pages 791-806.
    2. Michailides, Constantine & Gao, Zhen & Moan, Torgeir, 2016. "Experimental study of the functionality of a semisubmersible wind turbine combined with flap-type Wave Energy Converters," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 675-690.
    3. Atici, Kazim Baris & Simsek, Ahmet Bahadir & Ulucan, Aydin & Tosun, Mustafa Umur, 2015. "A GIS-based Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis approach for wind power plant site selection," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 86-96.
    4. Vasiliki Stratigaki & Peter Troch & Tim Stallard & David Forehand & Jens Peter Kofoed & Matt Folley & Michel Benoit & Aurélien Babarit & Jens Kirkegaard, 2014. "Wave Basin Experiments with Large Wave Energy Converter Arrays to Study Interactions between the Converters and Effects on Other Users in the Sea and the Coastal Area," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-34, February.
    5. Arán Carrión, J. & Espín Estrella, A. & Aznar Dols, F. & Zamorano Toro, M. & Rodríguez, M. & Ramos Ridao, A., 2008. "Environmental decision-support systems for evaluating the carrying capacity of land areas: Optimal site selection for grid-connected photovoltaic power plants," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(9), pages 2358-2380, December.
    6. Ramanathan, R. & Ganesh, L. S., 1995. "Energy resource allocation incorporating qualitative and quantitative criteria: An integrated model using goal programming and AHP," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 197-218, September.
    7. Nobre, Ana & Pacheco, Miguel & Jorge, Raquel & Lopes, M.F.P. & Gato, L.M.C., 2009. "Geo-spatial multi-criteria analysis for wave energy conversion system deployment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 97-111.
    8. Malara, Giovanni & Arena, Felice, 2013. "Analytical modelling of an U-Oscillating Water Column and performance in random waves," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 116-126.
    9. Mekonnen, Addisu D. & Gorsevski, Pece V., 2015. "A web-based participatory GIS (PGIS) for offshore wind farm suitability within Lake Erie, Ohio," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 162-177.
    10. Schillings, Christoph & Wanderer, Thomas & Cameron, Lachlan & van der Wal, Jan Tjalling & Jacquemin, Jerome & Veum, Karina, 2012. "A decision support system for assessing offshore wind energy potential in the North Sea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 541-551.
    11. Elhanafi, Ahmed & Macfarlane, Gregor & Fleming, Alan & Leong, Zhi, 2017. "Experimental and numerical investigations on the hydrodynamic performance of a floating–moored oscillating water column wave energy converter," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 369-390.
    12. Christoforaki, Mary & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2017. "Sustainable siting of an offshore wind park a case in Chania, Crete," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 624-633.
    13. Kaldellis, J.K. & Apostolou, D. & Kapsali, M. & Kondili, E., 2016. "Environmental and social footprint of offshore wind energy. Comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 543-556.
    14. Martins, J.C. & Goulart, M.M. & Gomes, M. das N. & Souza, J.A. & Rocha, L.A.O. & Isoldi, L.A. & dos Santos, E.D., 2018. "Geometric evaluation of the main operational principle of an overtopping wave energy converter by means of Constructal Design," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 727-741.
    15. Vasileiou, Margarita & Loukogeorgaki, Eva & Vagiona, Dimitra G., 2017. "GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 745-757.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Waqas Ayub & Ameer Hamza & George A. Aggidis & Xiandong Ma, 2023. "A Review of Power Co-Generation Technologies from Hybrid Offshore Wind and Wave Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Emin Sertaç Ari & Cevriye Gencer, 2020. "Proposal of a novel mixed integer linear programming model for site selection of a wind power plant based on power maximization with use of mixed type wind turbines," Energy & Environment, , vol. 31(5), pages 825-841, August.
    3. Jaan Rönkkö & Ali Khosravi & Sanna Syri, 2023. "Techno-Economic Assessment of a Hybrid Offshore Wind–Wave Farm: Case Study in Norway," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Majidi Nezhad, M. & Heydari, A. & Pirshayan, E. & Groppi, D. & Astiaso Garcia, D., 2021. "A novel forecasting model for wind speed assessment using sentinel family satellites images and machine learning method," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 2198-2211.
    5. Jan Michna & Krzysztof Rogowski & Galih Bangga & Martin O. L. Hansen, 2021. "Accuracy of the Gamma Re-Theta Transition Model for Simulating the DU-91-W2-250 Airfoil at High Reynolds Numbers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Choupin, Ophelie & Del Río-Gamero, B. & Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta & Yánez-Rosales, Pablo, 2022. "Integration of assessment-methods for wave renewable energy: Resource and installation feasibility," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 455-482.
    7. Meysam Asadi & Kazem Pourhossein & Younes Noorollahi & Mousa Marzband & Gregorio Iglesias, 2023. "A New Decision Framework for Hybrid Solar and Wind Power Plant Site Selection Using Linear Regression Modeling Based on GIS-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-24, May.
    8. Shabnam Hosseinzadeh & Amir Etemad-Shahidi & Rodney A. Stewart, 2023. "Site Selection of Combined Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Farms: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-33, February.
    9. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, Pandora & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2022. "A methodological framework for optimal siting of offshore wind farms: A case study on the island of Crete," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vasileiou, Margarita & Loukogeorgaki, Eva & Vagiona, Dimitra G., 2017. "GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis for site selection of hybrid offshore wind and wave energy systems in Greece," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 745-757.
    2. Dimitra G. Vagiona & Manos Kamilakis, 2018. "Sustainable Site Selection for Offshore Wind Farms in the South Aegean—Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    4. Shao, Meng & Han, Zhixin & Sun, Jinwei & Xiao, Chengsi & Zhang, Shulei & Zhao, Yuanxu, 2020. "A review of multi-criteria decision making applications for renewable energy site selection," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 377-403.
    5. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Shao, Meng & Zhao, Yuanxu & Sun, Jinwei & Han, Zhixin & Shao, Zhuxiao, 2023. "A decision framework for tidal current power plant site selection based on GIS-MCDM: A case study in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    7. Díaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2020. "An integrated GIS approach for site selection of floating offshore wind farms in the Atlantic continental European coastline," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    8. Gil-García, Isabel C. & Ramos-Escudero, Adela & García-Cascales, M.S. & Dagher, Habib & Molina-García, A., 2022. "Fuzzy GIS-based MCDM solution for the optimal offshore wind site selection: The Gulf of Maine case," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 130-147.
    9. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    10. Paweł Ziemba & Jarosław Wątróbski & Magdalena Zioło & Artur Karczmarczyk, 2017. "Using the PROSA Method in Offshore Wind Farm Location Problems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Şan, Murat & Akpınar, Adem & Bingölbali, Bilal & Kankal, Murat, 2021. "Geo-spatial multi-criteria evaluation of wave energy exploitation in a semi-enclosed sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    12. Vinhoza, Amanda & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2021. "Brazil's offshore wind energy potential assessment based on a Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    13. Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, Pandora & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2022. "A methodological framework for optimal siting of offshore wind farms: A case study on the island of Crete," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    14. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Eva Loukogeorgaki, 2020. "Strategic Planning of Offshore Wind Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Chen, Weixing & Zhou, Boen & Huang, Hao & Lu, Yunfei & Li, Shaoxun & Gao, Feng, 2022. "Design, modeling and performance analysis of a deployable WEC for ocean robots," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    16. Hugo Díaz & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2021. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Styliani Karamountzou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2023. "Suitability and Sustainability Assessment of Existing Onshore Wind Farms in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Kim, Choong-Ki & Jang, Seonju & Kim, Tae Yun, 2018. "Site selection for offshore wind farms in the southwest coast of South Korea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 151-162.
    19. Virtanen, E.A. & Lappalainen, J. & Nurmi, M. & Viitasalo, M. & Tikanmäki, M. & Heinonen, J. & Atlaskin, E. & Kallasvuo, M. & Tikkanen, H. & Moilanen, A., 2022. "Balancing profitability of energy production, societal impacts and biodiversity in offshore wind farm design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. Calvert, K. & Pearce, J.M. & Mabee, W.E., 2013. "Toward renewable energy geo-information infrastructures: Applications of GIScience and remote sensing that build institutional capacity," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 416-429.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:11:y:2018:i:8:p:2095-:d:163342. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.