IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p2074-d1074769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Site Selection of Combined Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Farms: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Shabnam Hosseinzadeh

    (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
    Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia)

  • Amir Etemad-Shahidi

    (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
    Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
    School of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia)

  • Rodney A. Stewart

    (School of Engineering and Built Environment, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia
    Cities Research Institute, Griffith University, Southport, QLD 4222, Australia)

Abstract

Growing energy demand worldwide and onshore limitations have increased interest in offshore renewable energy exploitation. A combination of offshore renewable energy resources such as wind and wave energy can produce stable power output at a lower cost compared to a single energy source. Consequently, identifying the best locations for constructing combined offshore renewable energy farms is crucial. This paper investigates the technical, economic, social, and environmental aspects of Combined Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Farm (COWWEF) site selection. Past literature was evaluated using a systematic review method to synthesize, criticize, and categorize study regions, dataset characteristics, constraints, evaluation criteria, and methods used for the site selection procedure. The results showed that most studied regions belong to European countries, and numerical model outputs were mainly used in the literature as met-ocean data due to the limited coverage and low spatiotemporal resolution of buoy and satellite observations. Environmental and marine usage are the main constraints in the site selection process. Among all constraints, shipping lanes, marine protected areas, and military exercise areas were predominately considered to be excluded from the potential sites for COWWEF development. The technical viability and economic feasibility of project deployment are emphasized in the literature. Resource assessment and distance to infrastructures were mostly evaluated among techno-economic criteria. Wind and wave energy power are the most important criteria for evaluating feasibility, followed by water depth, indicators of variability and correlation of the energy resources, and distance to the nearest port. Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods and resource-based analysis were the most-used evaluation frameworks. Resource-based studies mainly used met-ocean datasets to determine site technical and operational performance (i.e., resource availability, variability, and correlation), while MCDM methods were applied when a broader set of criteria were evaluated. Based on the conducted review, it was found that the literature lacks evaluation of seabed conditions (seabed type and slope) and consideration of uncertainty involved in the COWWEF site selection process. In addition, the market analysis and evaluation of environmental impacts of COWWEF development, as well as impacts of climate change on combined exploitation of offshore wind and wave energy, have rarely been investigated and need to be considered in future studies. Finally, by providing a comprehensive repository of synthesized and categorized information and research gaps, this study represents a road map for decision-makers to determine the most suitable locations for COWWEF developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Shabnam Hosseinzadeh & Amir Etemad-Shahidi & Rodney A. Stewart, 2023. "Site Selection of Combined Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Farms: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-33, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:2074-:d:1074769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/2074/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/2074/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kalogeri, Christina & Galanis, George & Spyrou, Christos & Diamantis, Dimitris & Baladima, Foteini & Koukoula, Marika & Kallos, George, 2017. "Assessing the European offshore wind and wave energy resource for combined exploitation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 244-264.
    2. Eva Loukogeorgaki & Dimitra G. Vagiona & Margarita Vasileiou, 2018. "Site Selection of Hybrid Offshore Wind and Wave Energy Systems in Greece Incorporating Environmental Impact Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Kaldellis, J.K. & Apostolou, D. & Kapsali, M. & Kondili, E., 2016. "Environmental and social footprint of offshore wind energy. Comparison with onshore counterpart," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 543-556.
    4. Gao, Qiang & Khan, Salman Saeed & Sergiienko, Nataliia & Ertugrul, Nesimi & Hemer, Mark & Negnevitsky, Michael & Ding, Boyin, 2022. "Assessment of wind and wave power characteristic and potential for hybrid exploration in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    5. Rusu, Eugen & Onea, Florin, 2019. "A parallel evaluation of the wind and wave energy resources along the Latin American and European coastal environments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1594-1607.
    6. Peters, Jared L. & Remmers, Tiny & Wheeler, Andrew J. & Murphy, Jimmy & Cummins, Valerie, 2020. "A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Tsoutsos, Theocharis & Drandaki, Maria & Frantzeskaki, Niki & Iosifidis, Eleftherios & Kiosses, Ioannis, 2009. "Sustainable energy planning by using multi-criteria analysis application in the island of Crete," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 1587-1600, May.
    8. Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Santos, F. & Sousa, M.C. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2019. "Projections of wind energy resources in the Caribbean for the 21st century," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 356-367.
    9. Deveci, Muhammet & Cali, Umit & Kucuksari, Sadik & Erdogan, Nuh, 2020. "Interval type-2 fuzzy sets based multi-criteria decision-making model for offshore wind farm development in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. P Patel, Ravi & Nagababu, Garlapati & Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh & V V Arun Kumar, Surisetty & M, Seemanth, 2022. "Combined wind and wave resource assessment and energy extraction along the Indian coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 931-945.
    11. Eugen Rusu & Florin Onea, 2017. "Joint Evaluation of the Wave and Offshore Wind Energy Resources in the Developing Countries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    12. Rusu, Liliana, 2019. "The wave and wind power potential in the western Black Sea," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1146-1158.
    13. Kamranzad, Bahareh & Hadadpour, Sanaz, 2020. "A multi-criteria approach for selection of wave energy converter/location," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    14. Reeve, D.E. & Chen, Y. & Pan, S. & Magar, V. & Simmonds, D.J. & Zacharioudaki, A., 2011. "An investigation of the impacts of climate change on wave energy generation: The Wave Hub, Cornwall, UK," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 2404-2413.
    15. Florin Onea & Sorin Ciortan & Eugen Rusu, 2017. "Assessment of the potential for developing combined wind-wave projects in the European nearshore," Energy & Environment, , vol. 28(5-6), pages 580-597, September.
    16. Sofia Spyridonidou & Dimitra G. Vagiona, 2020. "Systematic Review of Site-Selection Processes in Onshore and Offshore Wind Energy Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-26, November.
    17. Asadi, Meysam & Pourhossein, Kazem, 2021. "Wind farm site selection considering turbulence intensity," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    18. Dylan F. Jones & Graham Wall, 2016. "An extended goal programming model for site selection in the offshore wind farm sector," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 121-135, October.
    19. Dunnett, David & Wallace, James S., 2009. "Electricity generation from wave power in Canada," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 179-195.
    20. Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, Pandora & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2022. "A methodological framework for optimal siting of offshore wind farms: A case study on the island of Crete," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    21. Babatunde, Kazeem Alasinrin & Begum, Rawshan Ara & Said, Fathin Faizah, 2017. "Application of computable general equilibrium (CGE) to climate change mitigation policy: A systematic review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 61-71.
    22. Clemente, D. & Rosa-Santos, P. & Taveira-Pinto, F., 2021. "On the potential synergies and applications of wave energy converters: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    23. Wassie, Yibeltal T. & Adaramola, Muyiwa S., 2019. "Potential environmental impacts of small-scale renewable energy technologies in East Africa: A systematic review of the evidence," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 377-391.
    24. Gaughan, Eilis & Fitzgerald, Breiffni, 2020. "An assessment of the potential for Co-located offshore wind and wave farms in Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    25. Lira-Loarca, Andrea & Ferrari, Francesco & Mazzino, Andrea & Besio, Giovanni, 2021. "Future wind and wave energy resources and exploitability in the Mediterranean Sea by 2100," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).
    26. Pérez-Collazo, C. & Greaves, D. & Iglesias, G., 2015. "A review of combined wave and offshore wind energy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 141-153.
    27. Leijon, M. & Danielsson, O. & Eriksson, M. & Thorburn, K. & Bernhoff, H. & Isberg, J. & Sundberg, J. & Ivanova, I. & Sjöstedt, E. & Ågren, O. & Karlsson, K.E. & Wolfbrandt, A., 2006. "An electrical approach to wave energy conversion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(9), pages 1309-1319.
    28. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    29. Ferrari, Francesco & Besio, Giovanni & Cassola, Federico & Mazzino, Andrea, 2020. "Optimized wind and wave energy resource assessment and offshore exploitability in the Mediterranean Sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    30. Chaouachi, Aymen & Covrig, Catalin Felix & Ardelean, Mircea, 2017. "Multi-criteria selection of offshore wind farms: Case study for the Baltic States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 179-192.
    31. Díaz, H. & Guedes Soares, C., 2022. "A novel multi-criteria decision-making model to evaluate floating wind farm locations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 431-454.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tong Shu & Young Hoon Joo, 2023. "Non-Centralised Balance Dispatch Strategy in Waked Wind Farms through a Graph Sparsification Partitioning Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Qiang & Khan, Salman Saeed & Sergiienko, Nataliia & Ertugrul, Nesimi & Hemer, Mark & Negnevitsky, Michael & Ding, Boyin, 2022. "Assessment of wind and wave power characteristic and potential for hybrid exploration in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Gao, Qiang & Yuan, Rui & Ertugrul, Nesimi & Ding, Boyin & Hayward, Jennifer A. & Li, Ye, 2023. "Analysis of energy variability and costs for offshore wind and hybrid power unit with equivalent energy storage system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).
    3. Li, Jiangxia & Pan, Shunqi & Chen, Yongping & Yao, Yu & Xu, Conghao, 2022. "Assessment of combined wind and wave energy in the tropical cyclone affected region:An application in China seas," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Wen, Yi & Kamranzad, Bahareh & Lin, Pengzhi, 2022. "Joint exploitation potential of offshore wind and wave energy along the south and southeast coasts of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    5. Choupin, O. & Pinheiro Andutta, F. & Etemad-Shahidi, A. & Tomlinson, R., 2021. "A decision-making process for wave energy converter and location pairing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Muhammad Waqas Ayub & Ameer Hamza & George A. Aggidis & Xiandong Ma, 2023. "A Review of Power Co-Generation Technologies from Hybrid Offshore Wind and Wave Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Gideon, Roan A. & Bou-Zeid, Elie, 2021. "Collocating offshore wind and wave generators to reduce power output variability: A Multi-site analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 1548-1559.
    8. Francisco Haces-Fernandez & Hua Li & David Ramirez, 2018. "Assessment of the Potential of Energy Extracted from Waves and Wind to Supply Offshore Oil Platforms Operating in the Gulf of Mexico," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, April.
    9. Ferrari, Francesco & Besio, Giovanni & Cassola, Federico & Mazzino, Andrea, 2020. "Optimized wind and wave energy resource assessment and offshore exploitability in the Mediterranean Sea," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    10. Astariz, S. & Iglesias, G., 2016. "Co-located wind and wave energy farms: Uniformly distributed arrays," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 497-508.
    11. P Patel, Ravi & Nagababu, Garlapati & Kachhwaha, Surendra Singh & V V Arun Kumar, Surisetty & M, Seemanth, 2022. "Combined wind and wave resource assessment and energy extraction along the Indian coast," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 931-945.
    12. Jin, Peng & Zheng, Zhi & Zhou, Zhaomin & Zhou, Binzhen & Wang, Lei & Yang, Yang & Liu, Yingyi, 2023. "Optimization and evaluation of a semi-submersible wind turbine and oscillating body wave energy converters hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    13. Astariz, S. & Iglesias, G., 2015. "The economics of wave energy: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 397-408.
    14. Choupin, O. & Têtu, A. & Del Río-Gamero, B. & Ferri, F. & Kofoed, JP., 2022. "Premises for an annual energy production and capacity factor improvement towards a few optimised wave energy converters configurations and resources pairs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    15. Gkeka-Serpetsidaki, Pandora & Tsoutsos, Theocharis, 2022. "A methodological framework for optimal siting of offshore wind farms: A case study on the island of Crete," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    16. Rusu, Eugen & Onea, Florin, 2019. "An assessment of the wind and wave power potential in the island environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 830-846.
    17. Rusu, Eugen, 2020. "An evaluation of the wind energy dynamics in the Baltic Sea, past and future projections," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 350-362.
    18. Hugo Díaz & Carlos Guedes Soares, 2021. "A Multi-Criteria Approach to Evaluate Floating Offshore Wind Farms Siting in the Canary Islands (Spain)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Economic comparison of technological alternatives to harness offshore wind and wave energies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1121-1130.
    20. Castro-Santos, Laura & Martins, Elson & Guedes Soares, C., 2016. "Cost assessment methodology for combined wind and wave floating offshore renewable energy systems," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 866-880.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:2074-:d:1074769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.