IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v10y2022i12p323-d1003666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Local Government Capacity on Public Service Delivery: Lessons Learned from Decentralized Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Arif Setiawan

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
    Secretariat General, Ministry of Finance, DKI Jakarta 10710, Indonesia)

  • Prijono Tjiptoherijanto

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Benedictus Raksaka Mahi

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

  • Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik

    (Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia)

Abstract

The issue of poor local government capacity has been considered one of the problems impeding the implementation of decentralization, especially in developing countries. This study addresses this issue in the case of Indonesia, a country that has implemented massive decentralization (administrative, fiscal, and political) over the last two decades. The study aims to provide empirical evidence for the impact of local government capacity on public service delivery in the decentralization regime. Local government capacity is measured based on a policy capacity framework at the organizational level that includes three types of capacities: analytical, operational, and political. The regression of the panel data model, estimated with the Hausman–Taylor method, reveals that government capacity in terms of interactions of three types of capacities has a positive impact on public service delivery. This finding indicates the three types of capacities are complementary and effectively improve local government’s achievement in delivering public services. While operational capacity (including fiscal capacity) has long been reckoned in designing decentralization, this result gives empirical evidence that other critical capacities should be well considered, political and analytical capacities. It underpins the efforts to internalize local government capacity in designing and implementing decentralization programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Arif Setiawan & Prijono Tjiptoherijanto & Benedictus Raksaka Mahi & Khoirunurrofik Khoirunurrofik, 2022. "The Impact of Local Government Capacity on Public Service Delivery: Lessons Learned from Decentralized Indonesia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:323-:d:1003666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/12/323/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/10/12/323/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kis-Katos, Krisztina & Sjahrir, Bambang Suharnoko, 2017. "The impact of fiscal and political decentralization on local public investment in Indonesia," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 344-365.
    2. Faguet, Jean-Paul & Sánchez, Fabio, 2008. "Decentralization's Effects on Educational Outcomes in Bolivia and Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1294-1316, July.
    3. Jean-Paul Faguet & Fabio Sanchez, 2006. "Decentralization¬¥S Effects On Educational Outcomes In Bolivia And Colombia," Documentos CEDE 2255, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    4. Acemoglu, Daron, 2005. "Politics and economics in weak and strong states," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(7), pages 1199-1226, October.
    5. Yogi Vidyattama & Wahyu Sutiyono & Sugiyarto, 2022. "Factors of Budget Delay: Local Government Capacity, Bargaining and Political Interaction in Indonesia," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(1), pages 55-77, January.
    6. NakHyeok Choi, 2021. "Analyzing Local Government Capacity and Performance: Implications for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Blane Lewis, 2016. "Local political fragmentation: Fiscal and service delivery effects in Indonesia," Departmental Working Papers 2016-16, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    8. Kidjie Saguin & M. Ramesh & Michael Howlett, 2018. "Policy work and capacities in a developing country: evidence from the Philippines," Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(1), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Lewis, Blane D. & Hendrawan, Adrianus, 2019. "The impact of majority coalitions on local government spending, service delivery, and corruption in Indonesia," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 178-191.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helena Teles & Temístocles Oliveira Júnior & Joaquim Caeiro, 2025. "Building a Decentralization Index in Portugal: A Proposal on Conceptual and Methodological Foundations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Lei & Luo, Changtuo, 2023. "Does administrative decentralization promote outward foreign direct investment and productivity? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    2. Jeong, Dong Wook & Lee, Ho Jun & Cho, Sung Kyung, 2017. "Education decentralization, school resources, and student outcomes in Korea," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 12-27.
    3. Sanogo, Tiangboho, 2019. "Does fiscal decentralization enhance citizens’ access to public services and reduce poverty? Evidence from Côte d’Ivoire municipalities in a conflict setting," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 204-221.
    4. Ignacio Lozano & Mar�a Adelaida Mart�nez, 2013. "Enrollment and Quality Levels of Colombia's Public Basic Education: Has Fiscal Decentralization Improved Them?," Borradores de Economia 10387, Banco de la Republica.
    5. Mar√≠a Orduz, 2022. "Effect of educational spending on academic performance under different institutional arrangements," Documentos CEDE 20224, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    6. Manuel Gómez-Zaldívar, 2014. "Has the National Agreement for the Modernization of Basic Education contributed to improving levels of basic education and reducing disparities between the states?," Latin American Journal of Economics-formerly Cuadernos de Economía, Instituto de Economía. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile., vol. 51(1), pages 85-107, May.
    7. Galindo-Silva, Hector, 2015. "New parties and policy outcomes: Evidence from Colombian local governments," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 86-103.
    8. Danielle Resnick, 2022. "Does Accountability Undermine Service Delivery? The Impact of Devolving Agriculture in Ghana," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(2), pages 1003-1029, April.
    9. Buerger, Christian & Lincove, Jane Arnold & Mata, Catherine, 2023. "How context shapes the relationship between school autonomy and test-scores. An explanatory analysis using PISA 2015," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Anila Channa & Jean-Paul Faguet, 2016. "Decentralization of Health and Education in Developing Countries: A Quality-Adjusted Review of the Empirical Literature," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 31(2), pages 199-241.
    11. Catherine Rodríguez & Patricia Meirelles, 2010. "Devolution and Accountability Effects in the Public Provision of Water Services in Indonesia," Documentos CEDE 7905, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    12. Tselios, Vassilis & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2022. "Can decentralisation help address poverty and social exclusion in Europe?," CEPR Discussion Papers 17471, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Raúl A Ponce-Rodríguez & Charles R Hankla & Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Eunice Heredia-Ortiz, 2018. "Rethinking the Political Economy of Decentralization: How Elections and Parties Shape the Provision of Local Public Goods," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 48(4), pages 523-558.
    14. Fabiana Machado, 2013. "Decentralization and Accountability: The Curse of Local Underdevelopment," Research Department Publications IDB-WP-397, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    15. Sebastian Galiani & Ricardo Perez-Truglia, 2013. "School Management in Developing Countries," CEDLAS, Working Papers 0147, CEDLAS, Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
    16. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez, 2011. "Municipal Finances in Latin America: Features, Issues, and Prospects," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper1107, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    17. Grégoire ROTA-GRAZIOSI & Emilie CALDEIRA, 2014. "La décentralisation dans les pays en développement : une revue de la littérature - Decentralization in developing countries: A literature review," Working Papers 201411, CERDI.
    18. Kendall D. Funk & Erica Owen, 2020. "Consequences of an Anti‐Corruption Experiment for Local Government Performance in Brazil," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 444-468, March.
    19. Qurat ul Ain & Tahir Yousaf & Yan Jie & Yasmeen Akhtar, 2020. "The Impact of Devolution on Government Size and Provision of Social Services: Evi¬dence from Pakistan," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 234(3), pages 105-135, September.
    20. Ahmad, Ehtisham & Brosio, Giorgio, 2009. "Decentralization and local service provision: what do we know?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 38347, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:10:y:2022:i:12:p:323-:d:1003666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.