IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i16p1713-d1720266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Regulation vs. Perceived Value About Manure and Sewage Resource Utilization in Chinese Dairy Farms

Author

Listed:
  • Hao Liu

    (College of Economics, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410000, China)

  • Jing Zhang

    (School of Agriculture and Food Sustainability, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia)

  • Hua Peng

    (Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Zetian Yu

    (Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Xiaoxia Dong

    (Institute of Agricultural Information, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China)

Abstract

Clarifying the key driving factors behind the adoption of manure resource utilization technology and promoting its widespread application are crucial for achieving the high-quality development of animal husbandry. This study analyses survey data from 412 large-scale dairy farms across 23 provinces in China. The Cov-AHP method is used to measure the adoption intensity of technology and analyse its mechanisms and underlying logic. The results indicate that value perception, particularly economic value perception, is the strongest driver of adoption intensity. Although the direct effect of environmental regulation is limited, it significantly amplifies the influence of value perception—particularly economic value perception—on technology adoption intensity, especially in large-scale farms. Furthermore, incentive-based regulations (e.g., government subsidies) markedly promote the adoption of manure resource utilization technologies, whereas constraint-based measures (e.g., fines) exert stronger effects on small-scale farms. Additionally, demonstration farms serve as critical catalysts for disseminating best practices and accelerating technology adoption. This study suggests that policies should integrate value perception with targeted financial subsidies and regulatory measures to improve technology adoption, especially with support for small-scale farms. By leveraging demonstration farms to promote successful experiences, the comprehensive adoption of manure resource utilization technologies across the industry can be further improved.

Suggested Citation

  • Hao Liu & Jing Zhang & Hua Peng & Zetian Yu & Xiaoxia Dong, 2025. "Environmental Regulation vs. Perceived Value About Manure and Sewage Resource Utilization in Chinese Dairy Farms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1713-:d:1720266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/16/1713/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/16/1713/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McInnes, Morris & Ramakrishnan, Ram T. S., 1991. "A decision-theory model of motivation and its usefulness in the diagnosis of management control systems," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 167-184.
    2. Damania, Richard & Fredriksson, Per G. & List, John A., 2003. "Trade liberalization, corruption, and environmental policy formation: theory and evidence," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 490-512, November.
    3. Su, Hongwei & Liang, Biming, 2021. "The impact of regional market integration and economic opening up on environmental total factor energy productivity in Chinese provinces," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    4. Sardianou, E. & Genoudi, P., 2013. "Which factors affect the willingness of consumers to adopt renewable energies?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1-4.
    5. Syed H. Jafri & K. M. Mehedi Adnan & Stefan Baimbill Johnson & Anzalin Ali Talukder & Mark Yu & Edward Osei, 2024. "Challenges and Solutions for Small Dairy Farms in the U.S.: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu-Bong Lai, 2004. "Trade liberalization, consumption externalities and the environment," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 17(5), pages 1-9.
    2. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Popova, Olga, 2024. "Environment vs. Economic Growth: Do Environmental Preferences Translate Into Support for Green Parties?," IZA Discussion Papers 17475, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    3. Nicole A. MATHYS & Jaime DE MELO, 2010. "Trade and Climate Change: The Challenges Ahead," Working Papers P14, FERDI.
    4. Bauwens, Thomas, 2019. "Analyzing the determinants of the size of investments by community renewable energy members: Findings and policy implications from Flanders," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 841-852.
    5. Jianwei Qian & Runan Xiong, 2025. "Policy Instruments for Inclusive and Sustainable Development: Empirical Insights from China’s Pilot Free Trade Zones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
    6. Daniel Fiorino, 2011. "Explaining national environmental performance: approaches, evidence, and implications," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(4), pages 367-389, November.
    7. Gani, Azmat & Scrimgeour, Frank, 2014. "Modeling governance and water pollution using the institutional ecological economic framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 363-372.
    8. Galinato, Gregmar I. & Chouinard, Hayley H., 2018. "Strategic interaction and institutional quality determinants of environmental regulations," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 114-132.
    9. Nicolli, Francesco & Vona, Francesco, 2012. "The Evolution of Renewable Energy Policy in OECD Countries: Aggregate Indicators and Determinants," Climate Change and Sustainable Development 130897, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    10. Copeland, Brian R., 2005. "Policy Endogeneity and the Effects of Trade on the Environment," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(1), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Wang, Jianjun & Liu, Fang & Li, Li & Zhang, Jian, 2022. "More than innovativeness: Comparing residents’ motivations for participating renewable energy communities in different innovation segments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 552-563.
    12. Monde Rapiya & Mthunzi Mndela & Wayne Truter & Abel Ramoelo, 2025. "Assessing the Economic Viability of Sustainable Pasture and Rangeland Management Practices: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Kristian S. Nielsen & Kimberly A. Nicholas & Felix Creutzig & Thomas Dietz & Paul C. Stern, 2021. "The role of high-socioeconomic-status people in locking in or rapidly reducing energy-driven greenhouse gas emissions," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 6(11), pages 1011-1016, November.
    14. Maurizio Lisciandra & Carlo Migliardo, 2017. "An Empirical Study of the Impact of Corruption on Environmental Performance: Evidence from Panel Data," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 68(2), pages 297-318, October.
    15. Per G. Fredriksson & Jim R. Wollscheid, 2014. "Political Institutions, Political Careers and Environmental Policy," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(1), pages 54-73, February.
    16. Cole, Matthew A. & Fredriksson, Per G., 2009. "Institutionalized pollution havens," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(4), pages 1239-1256, February.
    17. Degirmenci, Tunahan & Yavuz, Hakan, 2024. "Environmental taxes, R&D expenditures and renewable energy consumption in EU countries: Are fiscal instruments effective in the expansion of clean energy?," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    18. Briguglio, Marie & Formosa, Glenn, 2017. "When households go solar: Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-162.
    19. Daisuke Ikazaki, 2014. "A Human Capital Based Growth Model with Environment and Corruption," Journal of Economic Structures, Springer;Pan-Pacific Association of Input-Output Studies (PAPAIOS), vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. L. Mundaca & H. Moncreiff, 2021. "New Perspectives on Green Energy Defaults," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 357-383, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1713-:d:1720266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.