IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p455-d1069274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tools for Predicting Forage Growth in Rangelands and Economic Analyses—A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Srinivasagan N. Subhashree

    (Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA
    Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA)

  • C. Igathinathane

    (Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA)

  • Adnan Akyuz

    (North Dakota State Climate Office, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58102, USA)

  • Md. Borhan

    (Texas Department of Transportation, Brownwood, TX 76802, USA)

  • John Hendrickson

    (Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

  • David Archer

    (Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

  • Mark Liebig

    (Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

  • David Toledo

    (Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

  • Kevin Sedivec

    (School of Natural Resource Sciences—Range Program, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA)

  • Scott Kronberg

    (Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

  • Jonathan Halvorson

    (Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Mandan, ND 58554, USA)

Abstract

Farmers and ranchers depend on annual forage production for grassland livestock enterprises. Many regression and machine learning (ML) prediction models have been developed to understand the seasonal variability in grass and forage production, improve management practices, and adjust stocking rates. Moreover, decision support tools help farmers compare management practices and develop forecast scenarios. Although numerous individual studies on forage growth, modeling, prediction, economics, and related tools are available, these technologies have not been comprehensively reviewed. Therefore, a systematic literature review was performed to synthesize current knowledge, identify research gaps, and inform stakeholders. Input features (vegetation index [VI], climate, and soil parameters), models (regression and ML), relevant tools, and economic factors related to grass and forage production were analyzed. Among 85 peer-reviewed manuscripts selected, Moderating Resolution Imaging Spectrometer for remote sensing satellite platforms and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), precipitation, and soil moisture for input features were most frequently used. Among ML models, the random forest model was the most widely used for estimating grass and forage yield. Four existing tools used inputs of precipitation, evapotranspiration, and NDVI for large spatial-scale prediction and monitoring of grass and forage dynamics. Most tools available for forage economic analysis were spreadsheet-based and focused on alfalfa. Available studies mostly used coarse spatial resolution satellites and VI or climate features for larger-scale yield prediction. Therefore, further studies should evaluate the use of high-resolution satellites; VI and climate features; advanced ML models; field-specific prediction tools; and interactive, user-friendly, web-based tools and smartphone applications in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Srinivasagan N. Subhashree & C. Igathinathane & Adnan Akyuz & Md. Borhan & John Hendrickson & David Archer & Mark Liebig & David Toledo & Kevin Sedivec & Scott Kronberg & Jonathan Halvorson, 2023. "Tools for Predicting Forage Growth in Rangelands and Economic Analyses—A Systematic Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-30, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:455-:d:1069274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/455/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/455/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ags:weecfo:287312 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Justin Derner & David Briske & Matt Reeves & Tami Brown-Brandl & Miranda Meehan & Dana Blumenthal & William Travis & David Augustine & Hailey Wilmer & Derek Scasta & John Hendrickson & Jerry Volesky &, 2018. "Vulnerability of grazing and confined livestock in the Northern Great Plains to projected mid- and late-twenty-first century climate," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 19-32, January.
    3. Peck, Dannele & Derner, Justin & Parton, William & Hartman, Melannie & Fuchs, Brian, 2019. "Flexible stocking with Grass-Cast: A new grassland productivity forecast to translate climate outlooks for ranchers," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(1), March.
    4. Yu, Jisang & Vandeveer, Monte & Volesky, Jerry D. & Harmoney, Keith, 2019. "Estimating the Basis Risk of Rainfall Index Insurance for Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 44(1), January.
    5. Kaul, Monisha & Hill, Robert L. & Walthall, Charles, 2005. "Artificial neural networks for corn and soybean yield prediction," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 85(1), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Niko Viljanen & Eija Honkavaara & Roope Näsi & Teemu Hakala & Oiva Niemeläinen & Jere Kaivosoja, 2018. "A Novel Machine Learning Method for Estimating Biomass of Grass Swards Using a Photogrammetric Canopy Height Model, Images and Vegetation Indices Captured by a Drone," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Corentin Leroux & Hazaël Jones & Léo Pichon & Serge Guillaume & Julien Lamour & James Taylor & Olivier Naud & Thomas Crestey & Jean-Luc Lablee & Bruno Tisseyre, 2018. "GeoFIS: An Open Source, Decision-Support Tool for Precision Agriculture Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Fan, Junliang & Zheng, Jing & Wu, Lifeng & Zhang, Fucang, 2021. "Estimation of daily maize transpiration using support vector machines, extreme gradient boosting, artificial and deep neural networks models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    9. Yusuke Kuwayama & Alexandra Thompson & Richard Bernknopf & Benjamin Zaitchik & Peter Vail, 2019. "Estimating the Impact of Drought on Agriculture Using the U.S. Drought Monitor," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 101(1), pages 193-210.
    10. C. Brock Porth & Lysa Porth & Wenjun Zhu & Milton Boyd & Ken Seng Tan & Kai Liu, 2020. "Remote Sensing Applications for Insurance: A Predictive Model for Pasture Yield in the Presence of Systemic Weather," North American Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(2), pages 333-354, April.
    11. Vogeler, Iris & Thomas, Steve & van der Weerden, Tony, 2019. "Effect of irrigation management on pasture yield and nitrogen losses," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 60-69.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yimin Hu & Shuqi Yang & Xin Qian & Zongxin Li & Yuchuan Fan & Kiril Manevski & Yuanquan Chen & Wangsheng Gao, 2023. "Bibliometric Network Analysis of Crop Yield Gap Research over the Past Three Decades," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cortney Cowley & Jacob Dice & David Rodziewicz, 2023. "Drought and Cattle: Implications for Ranchers," Research Working Paper RWP 23-06, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    2. Zheng, Jing & Fan, Junliang & Zhou, Minghua & Zhang, Fucang & Liao, Zhenqi & Lai, Zhenlin & Yan, Shicheng & Guo, Jinjin & Li, Zhijun & Xiang, Youzhen, 2022. "Ridge-furrow plastic film mulching enhances grain yield and yield stability of rainfed maize by improving resources capture and use efficiency in a semi-humid drought-prone region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    3. Vlontzos, G. & Pardalos, P.M., 2017. "Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 155-162.
    4. Nicole Meinusch & Susanne Kramer & Oliver Körner & Jürgen Wiese & Ingolf Seick & Anita Beblek & Regine Berges & Bernhard Illenberger & Marco Illenberger & Jennifer Uebbing & Maximilian Wolf & Gunter S, 2021. "Integrated Cycles for Urban Biomass as a Strategy to Promote a CO 2 -Neutral Society—A Feasibility Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    5. Jhorland Ayala-García & Federico Ceballos-Sierra, 2024. "How do environmental shocks affect competitors in a supply chain? Evidence from a competitors’ weighting matrix," Documentos de trabajo sobre Economía Regional y Urbana 324, Banco de la Republica de Colombia.
    6. Ji, Li-Qun, 2015. "An assessment of agricultural residue resources for liquid biofuel production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 561-575.
    7. Cai, Qingyin & Çakır, Metin & Beatty, Timothy & Park, Timothy A., 2022. "Drought and the Specialty Crops Production in California," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322530, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Cowley, Cortney A. & Rodziewicz, David & Dice, Jacob, 2023. "Impacts of Drought in the U.S. Cattle Sector," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335678, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Hailey Wilmer & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Shayan Ghajar & Peter Leigh Taylor & Caridad Souza & Justin D. Derner, 2020. "Managing for the middle: rancher care ethics under uncertainty on Western Great Plains rangelands," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 699-718, September.
    10. Cheng, Minghui & Wang, Haidong & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Shaohui & Wang, Yanli & Li, Yuepeng & Sun, Xin & Yang, Ling & Zhang, Fucang, 2021. "Water productivity and seed cotton yield in response to deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    11. Shao, Guomin & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Liu, Shouyang & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Liyuan & Cui, Xin, 2021. "Mapping maize crop coefficient Kc using random forest algorithm based on leaf area index and UAV-based multispectral vegetation indices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    12. Srinivasan, M.S. & Measures, Richard & Muller, Carla & Neal, Mark & Rajanayaka, Channa & Shankar, Ude & Elley, Graham, 2021. "Comparing the water use metrics of just-in-case, just-in-time and justified irrigation strategies using a scenario-based tool," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    13. Matthieu Stigler & David Lobell, 2021. "Optimal index insurance and basis risk decomposition: an application to Kenya," Papers 2111.08601, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2023.
    14. Cécile Couharde & Rémi Generoso, 2023. "The financial cost of stabilizing US farm income under climate change," Working Papers hal-04159823, HAL.
    15. James B. Keller & Tina L. Saitone, 2022. "Basis risk in the pasture, rangeland, and forage insurance program: Evidence from California," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(4), pages 1203-1223, August.
    16. Shao, Guomin & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Zhang, Liyuan & Wang, Yi & Zhang, Yu, 2023. "Prediction of maize crop coefficient from UAV multisensor remote sensing using machine learning methods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    17. Sofia Costanzini & Chiara Ferrari & Francesca Despini & Alberto Muscio, 2021. "Standard Test Methods for Rating of Solar Reflectance of Built-Up Surfaces and Potential Use of Satellite Remote Sensors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    18. Mhlangabezi Slayi & Leocadia Zhou & Ishmael Festus Jaja, 2023. "Constraints Inhibiting Farmers’ Adoption of Cattle Feedlots as a Climate-Smart Practice in Rural Communities of the Eastern Cape, South Africa: An In-Depth Examination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-30, October.
    19. Keeler, James B. & Saitone, Tina L., 2020. "Basis Risk Associated with the Pasture, Rangeland, and Forage Insurance Program: Evidence from California," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304322, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Qiang, Shengcai & Zhang, Yan & Fan, Junliang & Zhang, Fucang & Sun, Min & Gao, Zhiqiang, 2022. "Combined effects of ridge–furrow ratio and urea type on grain yield and water productivity of rainfed winter wheat on the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:455-:d:1069274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.