IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i5p166-d357456.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monitoring Soil Enzymes Activity before and after Animal Manure Application

Author

Listed:
  • George F. Antonious

    (Division of Environmental Studies, College of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601, USA)

  • Eric T. Turley

    (Division of Environmental Studies, College of Agriculture, Communities, and the Environment, Kentucky State University, Frankfort, KY 40601, USA)

  • Mohammad H. Dawood

    (Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA
    Current Address: Department of Horticulture and Landscape, College of Agriculture, University of Kufa, El-Najaf 54003, Iraq.)

Abstract

Soil enzymes (urease, invertase, acid and alkaline phosphatase) activity in the rhizosphere of field-grown tomato plants were used to monitor the impact of soil amendments (SA) and SA mixed with biochar on soil microbial activity four months after addition of amendments. The soil treatments were sewage sludge (SS); horse manure (HM); chicken manure (CM); vermicompost (worm castings); commercial inorganic fertilizer; commercial organic fertilizer; and no-mulch (NM) native soil used for comparison purposes. Soil treatments also were mixed with 10% (w/w) biochar to investigate the impact of biochar on soil enzymes activity. The results showed a significant increase in soil urease and invertase activities after incorporation of SA to native soil. Vermicompost and HM were superior in increasing urease and invertase activity four months after their addition to native soil. Alkaline phosphatase activity fluctuated among the soil treatments, revealing some obstruction of its activity. SS amended with biochar increased acid phosphatase activity by 115% four months after SS addition. Other than alkaline phosphatase, organic manure enhanced soil biological activity (microbial biomass and release of enzymes), indicating that the use of manures, rather than inorganic fertilizers, in crop production is an affordable and sustainable agricultural production system.

Suggested Citation

  • George F. Antonious & Eric T. Turley & Mohammad H. Dawood, 2020. "Monitoring Soil Enzymes Activity before and after Animal Manure Application," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:5:p:166-:d:357456
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/5/166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/5/166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George Fouad Antonious, 2018. "Biochar and Animal Manure Impact on Soil, Crop Yield and Quality," Chapters, in: Anna Aladjadjiyan (ed.), Agricultural Waste and Residues, IntechOpen.
    2. Lam, Man Kee & Lee, Keat Teong, 2012. "Potential of using organic fertilizer to cultivate Chlorella vulgaris for biodiesel production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 303-308.
    3. Dominic Woolf & James E. Amonette & F. Alayne Street-Perrott & Johannes Lehmann & Stephen Joseph, 2010. "Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, December.
    4. George Antonious & Eric Turley & Mohammad Dawood, 2019. "Ascorbic Acid, Sugars, Phenols, and Nitrates Concentrations in Tomato Grown in Animal Manure Amended Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bangxi Zhang & Xue Li & Tianhong Fu & Hongzhao Li & Wendi Li & Qinyu Zhang & Jie Wang & Bo Chen & Rende Yang & Baige Zhang & Xiaomin Wang & Xuehan He & Hao Chen & Yujin Zhang & Yutao Peng, 2023. "Insights into Opposite and Positive Effects of Biochar and Organic Fertilizer on Red Soil Properties and Growth of Pennisetum giganteum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sadaf Hashmi & Uzma Younis & Subhan Danish & Tariq Muhammad Munir, 2019. "Pongamia pinnata L. Leaves Biochar Increased Growth and Pigments Syntheses in Pisum sativum L. Exposed to Nutritional Stress," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, Amin & Amin, Nor Aishah Saidina & Mazaheri, Hossein, 2013. "A review on novel processes of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 683-710.
    3. Field, John L. & Tanger, Paul & Shackley, Simon J. & Haefele, Stephan M., 2016. "Agricultural residue gasification for low-cost, low-carbon decentralized power: An empirical case study in Cambodia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 612-624.
    4. Roberts, Cameron & Greene, Jenna & Nemet, Gregory F., 2023. "Key enablers for carbon dioxide removal through the application of biochar to agricultural soils: Evidence from three historical analogues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    5. Prajapati, Sanjeev Kumar & Malik, Anushree & Vijay, Virendra Kumar, 2014. "Comparative evaluation of biomass production and bioenergy generation potential of Chlorella spp. through anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 790-797.
    6. Leonel J. R. Nunes & Abel M. Rodrigues & João C. O. Matias & Ana I. Ferraz & Ana C. Rodrigues, 2021. "Production of Biochar from Vine Pruning: Waste Recovery in the Wine Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, May.
    7. Solinas, Stefania & Tiloca, Maria Teresa & Deligios, Paola A. & Cossu, Marco & Ledda, Luigi, 2021. "Carbon footprints and social carbon cost assessments in a perennial energy crop system: A comparison of fertilizer management practices in a Mediterranean area," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    8. Ning Zeng & Anthony King & Ben Zaitchik & Stan Wullschleger & Jay Gregg & Shaoqiang Wang & Dan Kirk-Davidoff, 2013. "Carbon sequestration via wood harvest and storage: An assessment of its harvest potential," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 118(2), pages 245-257, May.
    9. Marli Vermooten & Muhammad Nadeem & Mumtaz Cheema & Raymond Thomas & Lakshman Galagedara, 2019. "Temporal Effects of Biochar and Dairy Manure on Physicochemical Properties of Podzol: Case from a Silage-Corn Production Trial in Boreal Climate," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-14, August.
    10. Kyriakou, Maria & Patsalou, Maria & Xiaris, Nikolas & Tsevis, Athanasios & Koutsokeras, Loukas & Constantinides, Georgios & Koutinas, Michalis, 2020. "Enhancing bioproduction and thermotolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via cell immobilization on biochar: Application in a citrus peel waste biorefinery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 53-64.
    11. Huang, Yu-Fong & Chiueh, Pei-Te & Shih, Chun-Hao & Lo, Shang-Lien & Sun, Liping & Zhong, Yuan & Qiu, Chunsheng, 2015. "Microwave pyrolysis of rice straw to produce biochar as an adsorbent for CO2 capture," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 75-82.
    12. Hammond, Jim & Shackley, Simon & Sohi, Saran & Brownsort, Peter, 2011. "Prospective life cycle carbon abatement for pyrolysis biochar systems in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2646-2655, May.
    13. Hanuman Singh Jatav & Vishnu D. Rajput & Tatiana Minkina & Satish Kumar Singh & Sukirtee Chejara & Andrey Gorovtsov & Anatoly Barakhov & Tatiana Bauer & Svetlana Sushkova & Saglara Mandzhieva & Marina, 2021. "Sustainable Approach and Safe Use of Biochar and Its Possible Consequences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Jhónatan Reyes-Escobar & Erick Zagal & Marco Sandoval & Rodrigo Navia & Cristina Muñoz, 2015. "Development of a Biochar-Plant-Extract-Based Nitrification Inhibitor and Its Application in Field Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-12, October.
    15. Masebinu, S.O. & Akinlabi, E.T. & Muzenda, E. & Aboyade, A.O., 2019. "A review of biochar properties and their roles in mitigating challenges with anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 291-307.
    16. Kang, Yating & Yang, Qing & Bartocci, Pietro & Wei, Hongjian & Liu, Sylvia Shuhan & Wu, Zhujuan & Zhou, Hewen & Yang, Haiping & Fantozzi, Francesco & Chen, Hanping, 2020. "Bioenergy in China: Evaluation of domestic biomass resources and the associated greenhouse gas mitigation potentials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    17. Shaukat, Muhammad & Muhammad, Sher & Maas, Ellen D.V.L. & Khaliq, Tasneem & Ahmad, Ashfaq, 2022. "Predicting methane emissions from paddy rice soils under biochar and nitrogen addition using DNDC model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 466(C).
    18. George Antonious & Eric Turley & Mohammad Dawood, 2019. "Ascorbic Acid, Sugars, Phenols, and Nitrates Concentrations in Tomato Grown in Animal Manure Amended Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    19. Anand, Abhijeet & Kumar, Vivek & Kaushal, Priyanka, 2022. "Biochar and its twin benefits: Crop residue management and climate change mitigation in India," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    20. Evan A.N. Marks & Vasiliki Kinigopoulou & Hanene Akrout & Ahmed Amine Azzaz & Charalampos Doulgeris & Salah Jellali & Carlos Rad & Paula Sánchez Zulueta & Evangelos Tziritis & Leila El-Bassi & Camélia, 2020. "Potential for Production of Biochar-Based Fertilizers from Olive Mill Waste in Mediterranean Basin Countries: An Initial Assessment for Spain, Tunisia, and Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:5:p:166-:d:357456. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.