IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v195y2023ics004016252300389x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key enablers for carbon dioxide removal through the application of biochar to agricultural soils: Evidence from three historical analogues

Author

Listed:
  • Roberts, Cameron
  • Greene, Jenna
  • Nemet, Gregory F.

Abstract

Applying biochar to agricultural soils has the potential to sequester gigatons of carbon dioxide each year, while also improving agricultural yields and remediating soil pollutants. This, however, will require extremely fast growth of three subsystems: One to provide adequate material inputs (such as feed crops or agricultural byproducts); one to pyrolyze those inputs into biochar; and a third to distribute the product to farmers who spread it on soils. The growth of each of these subsystems faces unique social, political, and economic opportunities. We provide insights on these using three historical analogues: Fertilizer, ethanol fuel, and compost. These suggest several important findings for biochar: 1) Economic benefits for those who provide critical material inputs are important; 2) Generous investment in production facilities will be critical and should come from sources other than just carbon credits; 3) A distributed knowledge and quality control infrastructure will be necessary to support farmers using biochar; and 4) Biochar should be part of a wider transition to carbon-negative farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberts, Cameron & Greene, Jenna & Nemet, Gregory F., 2023. "Key enablers for carbon dioxide removal through the application of biochar to agricultural soils: Evidence from three historical analogues," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:195:y:2023:i:c:s004016252300389x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016252300389X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sohel Ahmed & Jim Hammond & Rodrigo Ibarrola & Simon Shackley & Stuart Haszeldine, 2012. "The potential role of biochar in combating climate change in Scotland: an analysis of feedstocks, life cycle assessment and spatial dimensions," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 487-505, July.
    2. Abhishek Kumar & Tanushree Bhattacharya, 2021. "Biochar: a sustainable solution," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 6642-6680, May.
    3. Duygan, Mert & Stauffacher, Michael & Meylan, Grégoire, 2021. "What constitutes agency? Determinants of actors’ influence on formal institutions in Swiss waste management," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Eduardo Aguilera & Gloria I. Guzmán & Juan Infante-Amate & David Soto & Roberto García-Ruiz & Antonio Herrera & Inmaculada Villa & Eva Torremocha & Guiomar Carranza & Manuel González de Molina, 2015. "Embodied energy in agricultural inputs. Incorporating a historical perspective," Documentos de Trabajo de la Sociedad de Estudios de Historia Agraria 1507, Sociedad de Estudios de Historia Agraria.
    5. Shoaib Mehmood & Bale V. Reddy & Marc A. Rosen, 2012. "Energy Analysis of a Biomass Co-firing Based Pulverized Coal Power Generation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-29, March.
    6. Kung, Chih-Chun & Mu, Jianhong E., 2019. "Prospect of China's renewable energy development from pyrolysis and biochar applications under climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Johnstone, Phil & McLeish, Caitriona, 2022. "World wars and sociotechnical change in energy, food, and transport: A deep transitions perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    8. Oliveira, Gustavo de L.T. & McKay, Ben & Plank, Christina, 2017. "How biofuel policies backfire: Misguided goals, inefficient mechanisms, and political-ecological blind spots," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 765-775.
    9. Hanuman Singh Jatav & Vishnu D. Rajput & Tatiana Minkina & Satish Kumar Singh & Sukirtee Chejara & Andrey Gorovtsov & Anatoly Barakhov & Tatiana Bauer & Svetlana Sushkova & Saglara Mandzhieva & Marina, 2021. "Sustainable Approach and Safe Use of Biochar and Its Possible Consequences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Musiolik, Jörg & Markard, Jochen & Hekkert, Marko & Furrer, Bettina, 2020. "Creating innovation systems: How resource constellations affect the strategies of system builders," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Grubler, Arnulf, 2012. "Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 8-16.
    12. Dominic Woolf & James E. Amonette & F. Alayne Street-Perrott & Johannes Lehmann & Stephen Joseph, 2010. "Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 1(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Palm, Alvar, 2022. "Innovation systems for technology diffusion: An analytical framework and two case studies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    14. Sinsel, Simon R. & Markard, Jochen & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2020. "How deployment policies affect innovation in complementary technologies—evidence from the German energy transition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    15. Adekunle, Ademola & Osazuwa, Peter & Raghavan, Vijaya, 2016. "Socio-economic determinants of agricultural mechanisation in Africa: A research note based on cassava cultivation mechanisation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 313-319.
    16. Lídia Cabral & Poonam Pandey & Xiuli Xu, 2022. "Epic narratives of the Green Revolution in Brazil, China, and India," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 249-267, March.
    17. Timothy E. Crews & Brian E. Rumsey, 2017. "What Agriculture Can Learn from Native Ecosystems in Building Soil Organic Matter: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johan Miörner & Jonas Heiberg & Christian Binz, 2021. "Global regime diffusion in space: a missed transition in San Diego’s water sector," GEIST - Geography of Innovation and Sustainability Transitions 2021(08), GEIST Working Paper Series.
    2. Mäkitie, Tuukka & Hanson, Jens & Steen, Markus & Hansen, Teis & Andersen, Allan Dahl, 2022. "Complementarity formation mechanisms in technology value chains," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(7).
    3. Xia, Longlong & Chen, Wenhao & Lu, Bufan & Wang, Shanshan & Xiao, Lishan & Liu, Beibei & Yang, Hongqiang & Huang, Chu-Long & Wang, Hongtao & Yang, Yang & Lin, Litao & Zhu, Xiangdong & Chen, Wei-Qiang , 2023. "Climate mitigation potential of sustainable biochar production in China," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Goetz, Ariane & Searchinger, Tim & Beringer, Tim & German, Laura & McKay, Ben & Oliveira, Gustavo de L.T. & Hunsberger, Carol, 2018. "Reply to commentary on the special issue Scaling up biofuels? A critical look at expectations, performance and governance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 658-665.
    5. Oyewo, Ayobami Solomon & Solomon, A.A. & Bogdanov, Dmitrii & Aghahosseini, Arman & Mensah, Theophilus Nii Odai & Ram, Manish & Breyer, Christian, 2021. "Just transition towards defossilised energy systems for developing economies: A case study of Ethiopia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 346-365.
    6. Atanu Ghoshray & Issam Malki, 2021. "The share of the global energy mix: Signs of convergence?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(1), pages 34-50, January.
    7. Caragliu, Andrea & Graziano, Marcello, 2022. "The spatial dimension of energy transition policies, practices and technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    8. Bessi, Alessandro & Guidolin, Mariangela & Manfredi, Piero, 2021. "The role of gas on future perspectives of renewable energy diffusion: Bridging technology or lock-in?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    9. Zeke Marshall & Paul E. Brockway, 2020. "A Net Energy Analysis of the Global Agriculture, Aquaculture, Fishing and Forestry System," Biophysical Economics and Resource Quality, Springer, vol. 5(2), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Detlef Vuuren & Elke Stehfest, 2013. "If climate action becomes urgent: the importance of response times for various climate strategies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 473-486, December.
    11. Grażyna Wojtkowska-Łodej & Elżbieta Jakubów, 2022. "The Role of Clean Generation Technologies in the Energy Transformation in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Timothy E. Crews & Douglas J. Cattani, 2018. "Strategies, Advances, and Challenges in Breeding Perennial Grain Crops," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-7, June.
    13. Huang, Yawen & Tao, Bo & Lal, Rattan & Lorenz, Klaus & Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre & Shrestha, Raj K. & Bai, Xiongxiong & Singh, Maninder P. & Lindsey, Laura E. & Ren, Wei, 2023. "A global synthesis of biochar's sustainability in climate-smart agriculture - Evidence from field and laboratory experiments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    14. Lukáš Režný & Vladimír Bureš, 2019. "Energy Transition Scenarios and Their Economic Impacts in the Extended Neoclassical Model of Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-25, July.
    15. Sovacool, Benjamin K. & Martiskainen, Mari, 2020. "Hot transformations: Governing rapid and deep household heating transitions in China, Denmark, Finland and the United Kingdom," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    16. Tatevik Yezekyan & Marco Benetti & Giannantonio Armentano & Samuele Trestini & Luigi Sartori & Francesco Marinello, 2021. "Definition of Reference Models for Power, Mass, Working Width, and Price for Tillage Implements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Hunsberger, Carol & Work, Courtney & Herre, Roman, 2018. "Linking climate change strategies and land conflicts in Cambodia: Evidence from the Greater Aural region," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 309-320.
    18. Infante-Amate, Juan & Aguilera, Eduardo & de Molina, Manuel González, 2018. "Energy transition in Agri-food systems. Structural change, drivers and policy implications (Spain, 1960–2010)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 570-579.
    19. Karoliina Isoaho & Jochen Markard, 2020. "The Politics of Technology Decline: Discursive Struggles over Coal Phase‐Out in the UK," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(3), pages 342-368, May.
    20. Fridstrøm, Lasse, 2017. "From innovation to penetration: Calculating the energy transition time lag for motor vehicles," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 487-502.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:195:y:2023:i:c:s004016252300389x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.