IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v15y2025i9p367-d1750472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Decision-Making Framework for Public–Private Partnership Model Selection in the Space Sector: Policy and Market Dynamics Across Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Marina Kawai

    (Department of Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan)

  • Shinya Hanaoka

    (Department of Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering, Institute of Science Tokyo, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan)

Abstract

The increasing complexity and commercialization of the global space sector have elevated the strategic role of public–private partnerships (PPPs). However, the criteria for selecting suitable PPP models remain underexplored, particularly regarding the influence of national policy and market environments. This study proposes a decision-making framework that links six indicators—national strategic goals, government role preferences, regulatory structures, capital access, private-sector capabilities, and commercial demand—to four distinct PPP models in the space sector. Drawing on Eisenhardt’s multi-case theory-building methodology, this study analyzes PPP evolution in four countries representing mature, emerging, and nascent countries: the United States, Japan, India, and the United Arab Emirates. The cross-case analysis reveals that high-autonomy PPP models emerge only when institutional, financial, and market factors are systemically aligned. Divergence in PPP forms is driven not solely by technical capabilities but also by governance postures and regulatory designs. The findings contribute to addressing ongoing challenges related to policy reform and increasing private-sector involvement in the space sector by developing a practical decision-making tool for public and private-sector actors engaged in space governance. Specifically, the diagnostic framework enables stakeholders to assess national readiness and select appropriate PPP models. It also supports strategic planning by highlighting the reforms and capacity-building measures required for countries with nascent and emerging economies to transition from government-led missions to commercially integrated space ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Marina Kawai & Shinya Hanaoka, 2025. "A Decision-Making Framework for Public–Private Partnership Model Selection in the Space Sector: Policy and Market Dynamics Across Countries," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-31, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:367-:d:1750472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/367/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/9/367/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wadid Lamine & Alistair Anderson & Sarah Jack & Alain Fayolle, 2021. "Entrepreneurial space and the freedom for entrepreneurship: Institutional settings, policy, and action in the space industry," Post-Print hal-03983144, HAL.
    2. Darko, Deborah & Zhu, Demi & Quayson, Matthew & Hossin, Md Altab & Omoruyi, Osayuwamen & Bediako, Albert Kweku, 2023. "A multicriteria decision framework for governance of PPP projects towards sustainable development," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PB).
    3. Nunzia Carbonara & Roberta Pellegrino, 2020. "The role of public private partnerships in fostering innovation," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 140-156, February.
    4. Frank Hartwich & Jaime Tola, 2007. "Public–private partnerships for agricultural innovation: concepts and experiences from 124 cases in Latin America," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 240-255.
    5. Baldwin, Robert & Cave, Martin & Lodge, Martin, 2011. "Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, edition 2, number 9780199576098.
    6. Stewart, Jenny, 1995. "Models of priority-setting for public sector research," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(1), pages 115-126, January.
    7. Darrin Grimsey & Mervyn K. Lewis, 2002. "Accounting for Public Private Partnerships," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(3-4), pages 245-270, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. AlHussaini, Wissam & Molz, Rick, 2009. "A post-Keynesian regulatory model of privatization," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 391-398, March.
    2. Panasiuk Aleksander, 2020. "Policy of Sustainable Development of Urban Tourism," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 27(2), pages 33-37, June.
    3. Luc Baumstark & Claude Ménard & William Roy & Anne Yvrande-Billon, 2005. "Modes de gestion et efficience des opérateurs dans le secteur des transports urbains de personnes," Post-Print halshs-00103116, HAL.
    4. Klerkx, Laurens & Leeuwis, Cees, 2008. "Institutionalizing end-user demand steering in agricultural R&D: Farmer levy funding of R&D in The Netherlands," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 460-472, April.
    5. Jan Fischer & Simon Guy, 2009. "Re-interpreting Regulations: Architects as Intermediaries for Low-carbon Buildings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2577-2594, November.
    6. Maciej Czaplewski, 2015. "Oddziaływanie regulacyjne Unii Europejskiej na rynek usług telekomunikacyjnych," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5, pages 65-87.
    7. Parker, David, 2001. "Economic Regulation: A Preliminary Literature Review and Summary of Research Questions Arising," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30616, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    8. Ogus, Anthony, 2001. "Regulatory Institutions and Structures," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30704, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    9. Ojo, Marianne, 2006. "Financial regulation and risk management: addressing risk challenges in a changing financial environment," MPRA Paper 32409, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jul 2011.
    10. Amaral, Miguel & Saussier, Stéphane & Yvrande-Billon, Anne, 2009. "Auction procedures and competition in public services: The case of urban public transport in France and London," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 166-175, June.
    11. Jeroen van der Heijden & Jitske de Jong, 2009. "Towards a Better Understanding of Building Regulation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 36(6), pages 1038-1052, December.
    12. Mauricio Tapia Herbas, 2013. "Determinación de un adecuado precio del gas natural para el sector eléctrico boliviano," Revista Latinoamericana de Desarrollo Economico, Carrera de Economía de la Universidad Católica Boliviana (UCB) "San Pablo", issue 19, pages 99-123.
    13. repec:ilo:ilowps:403814 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Tonci Bakovic & Bernard Tenenbaum & Fiona Woolf, 2003. "Regulation by Contract : A New Way to Privatize Electricity Distribution?," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 15078.
    15. Tomas Hellström & Merle Jacob & Karolin Sjöö, 2017. "From thematic to organizational prioritization: the challenges of implementing RDI priorities," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(5), pages 599-608.
    16. Arthur Huang & Efrén De la Mora Velasco & Adam Haney & Sergio Alvarez, 2022. "The Future of Destination Marketing Organizations in the Insight Era," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-6, September.
    17. Emilie Cloatre & Robert Dingwall, 2013. "“Embedded regulation:” The migration of objects, scripts, and governance," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 365-386, September.
    18. John Alford & Richard Speed, 2006. "Client focus in regulatory agencies," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 313-331, June.
    19. Bärbel R. Dorbeck‐Jung & Mirjan J. Oude Vrielink & Jordy F. Gosselt & Joris J. Van Hoof & Menno D. T. De Jong, 2010. "Contested hybridization of regulation: Failure of the Dutch regulatory system to protect minors from harmful media," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 154-174, June.
    20. Elizabeth Spencer, 2008. "Conditions for effective disclosure in the regulation of franchising," International Review of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(4), pages 509-525.
    21. Manotti, Jacopo & Sanasi, Silvia & Ghezzi, Antonio, 2025. "Sustainable business model innovation: A technology affordance perspective in the New Space Economy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:367-:d:1750472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.