IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiy2024i3p1039-1057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Consequences of Implementing Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Digital Economy from the Perspective of Generation Z

Author

Listed:
  • Elzbieta M. Kacperska
  • Joanna Stefanczyk
  • Pawel J. Dabrowski
  • Wieslawa Zaloga

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this article is to understand how Generation Z (born 1995-2010) perceives artificial intelligence (AI) and the effects of its implementation in the digital economy. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research was exploratory in nature. The study used a diagnostic survey method, a survey technique, and a survey questionnaire tool. The study was conducted using the CAWI (Computer Assisted Web Interviewing) method. The sample included 323 respondents. Findings: The study reveals the limited trust of the younger generation in AI and the high public awareness of privacy protection. The results also highlight the high frequency of AI use in everyday life and concerns about the possibility of AI replacing work performed by humans in specific sectors. Practical Implications: The results of the study provide valuable information for both private companies and public institutions as well as recommendations for politicians. Understanding the approach of the young generation to AI technology can influence the development strategies of companies and regulatory decisions regarding the technologies of the future. It can influence the directions of education. Originality/Value: Artificial intelligence and the digital economy are rapidly developing topics, but their specific impact on younger generations and selected sectors of the economy has not yet been widely studied. The originality of the study is the interdisciplinary approach to the problem from an economic, social and technical perspective. The study focuses on Generation Z, which is entering the labor and consumption market, a generation with different expectations, which makes them a unique research group.

Suggested Citation

  • Elzbieta M. Kacperska & Joanna Stefanczyk & Pawel J. Dabrowski & Wieslawa Zaloga, 2024. "The Consequences of Implementing Artificial Intelligence Technology in the Digital Economy from the Perspective of Generation Z," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 1039-1057.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:1039-1057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3764/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zarifhonarvar, Ali, 2023. "Economics of ChatGPT: A Labor Market View on the Occupational Impact of Artificial Intelligence," EconStor Preprints 268826, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    2. Xiao Wen Wang & Muhammad Umar & Nada Khaddage-Soboh & Adnan Safi, 2024. "From innovation to impact: unraveling the complexities of entrepreneurship in the digital age," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 3207-3221, December.
    3. Zain Anwar Ali & Mahreen Zain & M. Salman Pathan & Peter Mooney, 2024. "Contributions of artificial intelligence for circular economy transition leading toward sustainability: an explorative study in agriculture and food industries of Pakistan," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(8), pages 19131-19175, August.
    4. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua S. Gans & Avi Goldfarb, 2019. "Artificial Intelligence: The Ambiguous Labor Market Impact of Automating Prediction," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(2), pages 31-50, Spring.
    5. Balsmeier, Benjamin & Woerter, Martin, 2019. "Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    6. Ali Zarifhonarvar, 2023. "Economics of ChatGPT: a labor market view on the occupational impact of artificial intelligence," Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(2), pages 100-116, December.
    7. Thorsten Koch & Josef Windsperger, 2017. "Seeing through the network: Competitive advantage in the digital economy," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 6(1), pages 1-30, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabio Montobbio & Jacopo Staccioli & Maria Enrica Virgillito & Marco Vivarelli, 2024. "The empirics of technology, employment and occupations: Lessons learned and challenges ahead," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1622-1655, December.
    2. Montobbio, F. & Staccioli, J. & Virgillito, M.E. & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "The empirics of technology, employment and occupations," MERIT Working Papers 2022-037, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    3. Wei, Xinyi & Chu, Xiaoyuan & Geng, Jingyu & Wang, Yuhui & Wang, Pengcheng & Wang, HongXia & Wang, Caiyu & Lei, Li, 2024. "Societal impacts of chatbot and mitigation strategies for negative impacts: A large-scale qualitative survey of ChatGPT users," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    4. Duch-Brown, Néstor & Gomez-Herrera, Estrella & Mueller-Langer, Frank & Tolan, Songül, 2022. "Market power and artificial intelligence work on online labour markets," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(3).
    5. Jasmine Mondolo, 2022. "The composite link between technological change and employment: A survey of the literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 1027-1068, September.
    6. Fadi Bou Reslan & Nada Jabbour Al Maalouf, 2024. "Assessing the Transformative Impact of AI Adoption on Efficiency, Fraud Detection, and Skill Dynamics in Accounting Practices," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Tianchu Feng & Andrea Appolloni & Jiayu Chen, 2024. "How does corporate digital transformation affect carbon productivity? Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(12), pages 31425-31445, December.
    8. Zofia Grodek-Szostak & Marcin Suder & Aneta Piechaczek & Luis Ochoa Siguencia, 2021. "Assessment and Comparison of Digital Competences in Education for Selected European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 348-361.
    9. Yao Zhao & Xuena Kong & Mahmood Ahmad & Zahoor Ahmed, 2023. "Digital Economy, Industrial Structure, and Environmental Quality: Assessing the Roles of Educational Investment, Green Innovation, and Economic Globalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, January.
    10. Siliang Tong & Nan Jia & Xueming Luo & Zheng Fang, 2021. "The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(9), pages 1600-1631, September.
    11. Cao, Sean & Jiang, Wei & Wang, Junbo & Yang, Baozhong, 2024. "From Man vs. Machine to Man + Machine: The art and AI of stock analyses," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    12. Montobbio, Fabio & Staccioli, Jacopo & Virgillito, Maria Enrica & Vivarelli, Marco, 2022. "Robots and the origin of their labour-saving impact," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Liviu Andrei Toader & Dorel Mihai Paraschiv & Florentina Chițu, 2023. "The Effects of Individuals’ Levels of Computer Skills on the ICT Sector Employment in the European Union during the COVID-19 Pandemics," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 26(85), pages 67-77, June.
    14. Beier, Grischa & Matthess, Marcel & Shuttleworth, Luke & Guan, Ting & de Oliveira Pereira Grudzien, David Iubel & Xue, Bing & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Chen, Ling, 2022. "Implications of Industry 4.0 on industrial employment: A comparative survey from Brazilian, Chinese, and German practitioners," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. Ying Wu & Yuanyue Deng, 2024. "Does digital transformation crowd out the employment of lower skill labor?," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(3), pages 726-748, July.
    16. Daxing Chen & Helian Xu & Guangya Zhou, 2024. "Has Artificial Intelligence Promoted Manufacturing Servitization: Evidence from Chinese Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Owan, Valentine Joseph & Agurokpon, Daniel Clement & Udida, Joseph Udida, 2022. "Curriculum Restructuring and Job Creation Among Nigerian Graduates: The Mediating Role of Emerging Internet Applications," EdArXiv nymrf, Center for Open Science.
    18. Inna S. Lola & Anton Manukov, 2020. "Forecasting Employment In Small Businesses In Russia: The Relevance Of Business Tendency Surveys," HSE Working papers WP BRP 113/STI/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    19. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Krämer, Jan & Palan, Nicole, 2024. "Socioeconomic benefits of high-speed broadband availability and service adoption: A survey," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7).
    20. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua S. Gans & Avi Goldfarb, 2023. "Similarities and Differences in the Adoption of General Purpose Technologies," NBER Chapters, in: Technology, Productivity, and Economic Growth, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Artificial intelligence; generation Z; digital economy; trust; economic effects of AI implementation.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxvii:y:2024:i:3:p:1039-1057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.