IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxviiiy2025i1p918-948.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformation of a Beekeeping Farm as a Unique Family Business Model: Insights from Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Kus
  • Ireneusz Zuchowski
  • Wojciech Zbaraszewski

Abstract

Purpose: The article's main goal is to assess the development potential of beekeeping farms and identify the main barriers accompanying it in Polish zonal conditions. Design/Methodology/Approach: In Poland, there is a clear regional differentiation of individual components characterizing the beekeeping sector - the number of bee colonies, obtained bee products, or people running apiaries is growing. Visible changes also appeared over the years under study (2015-2020) in terms of honey yield and price, species diversity of bee products, and the periods of honey bee collection. Among most surveyed beekeepers, recent years have resulted in implementing many innovative solutions in methods and production processes, products offered, forms, and sales channels. Findings: Research on bee farms in the years 2015–2020 indicates a systematic increase in the number of bees and a broadening of beekeeping practices, which shows a growing interest in the traditional craft of beekeeping. The modernisation of production methods, while maintaining traditional principles, has contributed to the increase in the efficiency of apiaries and the diversification of bee products on offer. Adaptation to changing climatic and market conditions, including through the modification of harvesting periods and the expansion of sales channels, confirms the sector's flexibility. Despite the organisational, financial and demographic barriers, the prospects for the development of beekeeping remain optimistic. A key element of further development is integrated institutional support, which, together with the cultivation of family traditions, enables the harmonious combination of experience with modern solutions. Practical Implications: The study demonstrates a significant increase in the average number of bee colonies per apiary, underscoring the need for enhanced management practices that can effectively handle rapid expansion. Diversification of bee products beyond traditional honey production opens new avenues for value addition and market expansion, thereby improving the economic resilience of family-run apiaries. Legislative changes and evolving consumer preferences are reshaping sales channels, which necessitates a strategic integration of both conventional and digital marketing approaches. Finally, these practical implications highlight the critical role of targeted advisory services and supportive policies in ensuring the long-term sustainability and profitability of Polish apiary farms. Originality/Value: The motives guiding the modern apiary management process are mainly hobby-related, resulting from the continuation of multi-generational family traditions and less frequently from economic reasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Kus & Ireneusz Zuchowski & Wojciech Zbaraszewski, 2025. "Transformation of a Beekeeping Farm as a Unique Family Business Model: Insights from Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 918-948.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:1:p:918-948
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/3945/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Piotr Semkiw & Piotr Skubida, 2021. "Bee Bread Production—A New Source of Income for Beekeeping Farms?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Gallai, Nicola & Salles, Jean-Michel & Settele, Josef & Vaissière, Bernard E., 2009. "Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 810-821, January.
    3. Faccio, Mara & Lang, Larry H. P., 2002. "The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 365-395, September.
    4. O'Boyle, Ernest H. & Pollack, Jeffrey M. & Rutherford, Matthew W., 2012. "Exploring the relation between family involvement and firms' financial performance: A meta-analysis of main and moderator effects," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-18.
    5. Gallai, Nicola & Salles, Jean-Michel & Settele, Josef & Vaissière, Bernard E., 2009. "Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 810-821, January.
    6. Unai Arzubiaga & Txomin Iturralde & Amaia Maseda & Josip Kotlar, 2018. "Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in family SMEs: the moderating effects of family, women, and strategic involvement in the board of directors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 217-244, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Balzan, Mario V & Caruana, Julio & Zammit, Annrica, 2018. "Assessing the capacity and flow of ecosystem services in multifunctional landscapes: Evidence of a rural-urban gradient in a Mediterranean small island state," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 711-725.
    2. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    3. Kathrin Stenchly & Marc Victor Hansen & Katharina Stein & Andreas Buerkert & Wilhelm Loewenstein, 2018. "Income Vulnerability of West African Farming Households to Losses in Pollination Services: A Case Study from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-12, November.
    4. Grazia Zulian & Joachim Maes & Maria Luisa Paracchini, 2013. "Linking Land Cover Data and Crop Yields for Mapping and Assessment of Pollination Services in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Lippert, Christian & Feuerbacher, Arndt & Narjes, Manuel, 2021. "Revisiting the economic valuation of agricultural losses due to large-scale changes in pollinator populations," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. Luciano Pilati & Vasco Boatto, 2014. "Jointness in Sites: The Case of Migratory Beekeeping," DEM Discussion Papers 2014/10, Department of Economics and Management.
    7. Nicholas W Calderone, 2012. "Insect Pollinated Crops, Insect Pollinators and US Agriculture: Trend Analysis of Aggregate Data for the Period 1992–2009," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Soy-Massoni, Emma & Langemeyer, Johannes & Varga, Diego & Sáez, Marc & Pintó, Josep, 2016. "The importance of ecosystem services in coastal agricultural landscapes: Case study from the Costa Brava, Catalonia," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(C), pages 43-52.
    9. Miettinen, Antti & Korpela, Eeva-Liisa & Hyytiäinen, Kari & Kuussaari, Mikko, 2014. "Cost-effectiveness of agri-environmental measures when aiming at promoting ecosystem service availability, species diversity or species of conservation concern," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182686, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. repec:idb:brikps:64718 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Basualdo, Marina & Cavigliasso, Pablo & de Avila, Rubem Samuel & Aldea-Sánchez, Patricia & Correa-Benítez, Adriana & Harms, Jaime Martínez & Ramos, Ana Karen & Rojas-Bravo, Valeska & Salvarrey, Sheena, 2022. "Current status and economic value of insect-pollinated dependent crops in Latin America," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    12. Ioannis Arzoumanidis & Andrea Raggi & Luigia Petti, 2019. "Life Cycle Assessment of Honey: Considering the Pollination Service," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, March.
    13. Lafuite, A.-S. & Loreau, M., 2017. "Time-delayed biodiversity feedbacks and the sustainability of social-ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 351(C), pages 96-108.
    14. Patricia A. Henríquez-Piskulich & Constanza Schapheer & Nicolas J. Vereecken & Cristian Villagra, 2021. "Agroecological Strategies to Safeguard Insect Pollinators in Biodiversity Hotspots: Chile as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-31, June.
    15. Centner, Terence J. & Brewer, Brady & Leal, Isaac, 2018. "Reducing damages from sulfoxaflor use through mitigation measures to increase the protection of pollinator species," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 70-76.
    16. Jones, Philip J., 2014. "Replacing soya in livestock feeds with UK-grown protein crops : prospects and implications," Centre for Agricultural Strategy - Papers and Reports 337545, University of Reading.
    17. Reddy, A. Amarender & Bhattacharya, Anindita & Reddy, S. Venku & Ricart, Sandra, 2021. "Farmers’ Distress Index: An Approach for an Action Plan to Reduce Vulnerability in the Drylands of India," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 10(11), pages 1-1.
    18. Nicola Gallai & Jean-Michel Salles & Charles C. Figuieres & Bernard Vaissière, 2009. "Economic assessment of an insect pollinator decline: a general equilibrium analysis [Évaluation économique du déclin d'un insecte pollinisateur : une analyse en équilibre général]," Working Papers hal-02820916, HAL.
    19. Narjes, Manuel Ernesto & Lippert, Christian, 2016. "Longan fruit farmers' demand for policies aimed at conserving native pollinating bees in Northern Thailand," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 18(C), pages 58-67.
    20. Margot Karlikow & Evan Amalfitano & Xiaolong Yang & Jennifer Doucet & Abigail Chapman & Peivand Sadat Mousavi & Paige Homme & Polina Sutyrina & Winston Chan & Sofia Lemak & Alexander F. Yakunin & Adam, 2023. "CRISPR-induced DNA reorganization for multiplexed nucleic acid detection," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    21. Melathopoulos, Andony P. & Stoner, Alexander M., 2015. "Critique and transformation: On the hypothetical nature of ecosystem service value and its neo-Marxist, liberal and pragmatist criticisms," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 173-181.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Family business; Polish apiaries; develompent potencial; beekeeping farms; development barriers; apiary management.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • L26 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Entrepreneurship

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxviii:y:2025:i:1:p:918-948. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.