Economic assessment of an insect pollinator decline: A general equilibrium analysis
Insect pollination service is widely used in agriculture. This pollination service contributes significantly to the total economic value of crop production and can be valued this way. A better economic valuation is be to assess the welfare loss resulting from insect pollinator decline, this welfare loss being the sum of producer and consumer surplus variation. In this study, we assess the impact of insect pollinators on the social welfare within a general equilibrium analysis. What would be the consequences of a production loss due to an insect pollinator decline considering the adaptation of the overall economy and more particularly considering the possible spillovers on others markets? How are changes in profits distributed between producers of pollinated goods and other producers? These two questions will be studied within two alternative scenarios for the distribution of property rights over the firms: the case where agents possess and equal share of the productive sector (the egalitarian ownership structure) and the case where each agent possess one firm (the polarized ownership structure). For each scenario, we considered two states of the economy. In the first state, agent and firms are homogeneous. In the second state, firms are heterogeneous. The social welfare is a function of the profile of consumers' utilities weighted by a ratio expressing the social preferences. We will analyze and measure the variation of the social welfare after the insect pollinator decline. Under the egalitarian ownership structure, we found that an insect pollinator decline will cause a social welfare loss. However this loss is reduced by the possibility of agents to consume the good, for which production does not depends on insect pollination. This result no longer holds when the distribution of the property right of firms is heterogeneous between agents. In this case the owner of the firm that does not produce insect pollination dependent good, would experience a gain in utility. As a result, the social welfare could increase after a pollinator decline. This social welfare gain would raise if production function of the firm of the non agricultural sector would be more efficient than the agricultural one.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2009|
|Date of revision:||Dec 2009|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Avenue Raymond Dugrand, CS 79606, 34960 Montpellier Cedex 2|
Web page: http://www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lam:wpaper:09-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Patricia Modat)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.