IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/hal/journl/halshs-01293686.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline

Author

Listed:
  • Nicola Gallai

    (LEREPS - Laboratoire d'Etude et de Recherche sur l'Economie, les Politiques et les Systèmes Sociaux - UT Capitole - Université Toulouse Capitole - UT - Université de Toulouse - UT2J - Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès - UT - Université de Toulouse - Institut d'Études Politiques [IEP] - Toulouse - ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville, ENSFEA - École Nationale Supérieure de Formation de l'Enseignement Agricole de Toulouse-Auzeville)

  • Jean-Michel Salles

    (LAMETA - Laboratoire Montpelliérain d'Économie Théorique et Appliquée - UM1 - Université Montpellier 1 - UPVM - Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - Montpellier SupAgro - Centre international d'études supérieures en sciences agronomiques - UM - Université de Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - Montpellier SupAgro - Institut national d’études supérieures agronomiques de Montpellier)

  • Josef Settele

    (UFZ - Helmholtz Zentrum für Umweltforschung = Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research)

  • Bernard E. Vaissière

    (AE - Abeilles et Environnement - INRA - Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique - AU - Avignon Université)

Abstract

There is mounting evidence of pollinator decline all over the world and consequences in many agricultural areas could be significant. We assessed these consequences by measuring 1) the contribution of insect pollination to the world agricultural output economic value, and 2) the vulnerability of world agriculture in the face of pollinator decline. We used a bioeconomic approach, which integrated the production dependence ratio on pollinators, for the 100 crops used directly for human food worldwide as listed by FAO. The total economic value of pollination worldwide amounted to €153 billion, which represented 9.5% of the value of the world agricultural production used for human food in 2005. In terms of welfare, the consumer surplus loss was estimated between €190 and €310 billion based upon average price elasticities of –1.5 to –0.8, respectively. Vegetables and fruits were the leading crop categories in value of insect pollination with about €50 billion each, followed by edible oil crops, stimulants, nuts and spices. The production value of a ton of the crop categories that do not depend on insect pollination averaged €151 while that of those that are pollinator-dependent averaged €761. The vulnerability ratio was calculated for each crop category at the regional and world scales as the ratio between the economic value of pollination and the current total crop value. This ratio varied considerably among crop categories and there was a positive correlation between the rate of vulnerability to pollinators decline of a crop category and its value per production unit. Looking at the capacity to nourish the world population after pollinator loss, the production of 3 crop categories – namely fruits, vegetables, and stimulants– will clearly be below the current consumption level at the world scale and even more so for certain regions like Europe. Yet, although our valuation clearly demonstrates the economic importance of insect pollinators, it cannot be considered as a scenario since it does not take into account the strategic responses of the markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicola Gallai & Jean-Michel Salles & Josef Settele & Bernard E. Vaissière, 2009. "Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline," Post-Print halshs-01293686, HAL.
    • Handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01293686
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014
    Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01293686
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-01293686/document
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dagmar Schröter & Colin Polsky & Anthony Patt, 2005. "Assessing vulnerabilities to the effects of global change: an eight step approach," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 573-595, October.
    2. David W. Roubik, 2002. "The value of bees to the coffee harvest," Nature, Nature, vol. 417(6890), pages 708-708, June.
    3. Hassan, Daniel & Simioni, Michel, 2002. "Price Linkage and Transmission between Shippers and Retailers in the French Fresh Vegetable Channel," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24794, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Alan L. Olmstead & Donald B. Wooten, 1987. "Bee Pollination and Productivity Growth: The Case of Alfalfa," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(1), pages 56-63.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kitti, Mitri & Heikkila, Jaakko & Huhtala, Anni, 2006. "Fair policies for the coffee trade - protecting people or biodiversity?," Discussion Papers 11858, MTT Agrifood Research Finland.
    2. Rezitis, Anthony N. & Pachis, Dimitris N., 2013. "Investigating the Price Transmission Mechanism of the Greek Fresh Tomato Market with a Markov Switching Vector Error Correction model," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(2), pages 1-17.
    3. Jesús Hernando Gómez & Pablo Benavides & Juan Diego Maldonado & Juliana Jaramillo & Flor Edith Acevedo & Zulma Nancy Gil, 2023. "Flower-Visiting Insects Ensure Coffee Yield and Quality," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, July.
    4. H.M. Tuihedur Rahman & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "An Analytical Framework for Assessing Context-Specific Rural Livelihood Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-26, July.
    5. Terese E. Venus & Stephanie Bilgram & Johannes Sauer & Arun Khatri-Chettri, 2022. "Livelihood vulnerability and climate change: a comparative analysis of smallholders in the Indo-Gangetic plains," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1981-2009, February.
    6. Bakucs, Lajos Zoltan & Ferto, Imre & Szabo, Gabor G., 2007. "Price transmission in the Hungarian vegetable sector," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 106, pages 1-17, July.
    7. Ralph Lasage & Sanne Muis & Carolina S. E. Sardella & Michiel A. Van Drunen & Peter H. Verburg & Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, 2015. "A Stepwise, Participatory Approach to Design and Implement Community Based Adaptation to Drought in the Peruvian Andes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-32, February.
    8. Alex Coletti & Peter Howe & Brent Yarnal & Nathan Wood, 2013. "A support system for assessing local vulnerability to weather and climate," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 65(1), pages 999-1008, January.
    9. Karoliina Rimhanen & Hanna Mäkinen & Miia Kuisma & Helena Kahiluoto, 2023. "What enhances dairy system resilience? Empirical cases in Finland and Russia," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Shepherd, Philippa M. & Dissart, Jean-Christophe, 2022. "Reframing vulnerability and resilience to climate change through the lens of capability generation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    11. E. Keskitalo, 2009. "Governance in vulnerability assessment: the role of globalising decision-making networks in determining local vulnerability and adaptive capacity," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 185-201, February.
    12. Xingchen Lv & Jun Meng & Qiufeng Wu, 2022. "Dynamic Influence of Network Public Opinions on Price Fluctuation of Small Agricultural Products Based on NLP-TVP-VAR Model—Taking Garlic as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    13. Pérez Agúndez, José A. & Yimam, Eden & Raux, Pascal & Rey-Valette, Hélène & Girard, Sophie, 2014. "Modeling economic vulnerability: As applied to microbiological contamination on the Thau Lagoon shellfish farming industry," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 143-151.
    14. Roopam Shukla & Kamna Sachdeva & P. K. Joshi, 2018. "Demystifying vulnerability assessment of agriculture communities in the Himalayas: a systematic review," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 91(1), pages 409-429, March.
    15. Yu Chen, 2016. "Conceptual Framework for the Development of an Indicator System for the Assessment of Regional Land Subsidence Disaster Vulnerability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Tang, Qian & Wang, Jinman & Jing, Zhaorui & Yan, Youlong & Niu, Hebin, 2021. "Response of ecological vulnerability to land use change in a resource-based city, China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    17. Nakajima, Toru & Matsuda, H. & Rifin, Amzul, 2010. "The Structural Change in the Supply Chain of Oil Palm – A Case of North Sumatra Province, Indonesia," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95206, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Rucker, Randal R. & Thurman, Walter N. & Burgett, Michael, 2001. "An Empirical Analysis Of Honeybee Pollination Markets," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20547, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Adam Pártl & David Vačkář & Blanka Loučková & Eliška Krkoška Lorencová, 2017. "A spatial analysis of integrated risk: vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to different hazards in the Czech Republic," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 89(3), pages 1185-1204, December.
    20. Elodie Bertrand, 2011. "What do cattle and bees tell us about the Coase theorem?," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 39-62, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01293686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CCSD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.