IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/ijfirm/v10y2020i3p81-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Accounting Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Agus Munandar
  • Akhmad Syakhroza
  • Dwi Martani
  • Dodik Siswantoro

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on the accounting performance (AP). This study extend the previous literature in terms of country coverage which employing Zakat as a proxy for CSR. Design/Methodology/Approach: Our sample for this study is 709 firms from companies in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and Malaysia. We predict that highly corporate social responsibility exhibits high level of return on equity (ROE), and return on assets (ROA). Findings: We find that firms with strong incentives for corporate social responsibility are more likely to increase their ROE and ROA. This suggest that corporate social responsibility is important platform in increasing its corporate performance. Practical implications: Based on this study, effectiveness of implementation of CSR program benefits the society, in turn, leads the company to enhance the level of CFP. Originality/Value: This paper uses some companies in some countries in a cross country analysis. Research results in one country often overlooks institutional and cultural factors such as corporate governance, local government regulations, and the relationship between shareholders and management.

Suggested Citation

  • Agus Munandar & Akhmad Syakhroza & Dwi Martani & Dodik Siswantoro, 2020. "How Corporate Social Responsibility Affects Accounting Performance: A Cross-Country Analysis," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 10(3), pages 81-89.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:81-89
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalfirm.com/journal/223/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kao, Erin H. & Yeh, Chih-Chuan & Wang, Li-Hsun & Fung, Hung-Gay, 2018. "The relationship between CSR and performance: Evidence in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 155-170.
    2. Angeloantonio Russo & Francesco Perrini, 2010. "Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 207-221, January.
    3. Brown, William O. & Helland, Eric & Smith, Janet Kiholm, 2006. "Corporate philanthropic practices," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 855-877, December.
    4. Yun-Chia Yan & Li-Chuan Chou & Ta-Cheng Chang & John Darcy, 2017. "The Impact of Social Responsibility on Corporate Performance: Evidence from Taiwan," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 6(2), pages 181-181, May.
    5. Stephen Brammer & Andrew Millington, 2008. "Does it pay to be different? An analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(12), pages 1325-1343, December.
    6. Baruch Lev & Christine Petrovits & Suresh Radhakrishnan, 2010. "Is doing good good for you? how corporate charitable contributions enhance revenue growth," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 182-200, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jun Chen & Wang Dong & Jamie Tong & Feida Zhang, 2018. "Corporate Philanthropy and Tunneling: Evidence from China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 135-157, June.
    2. Keling Wang & Yaqiong Miao & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Dengfeng Hu, 2019. "Philanthropic giving, sales growth, and tourism firm performance: An empirical test of a theoretical assumption," Tourism Economics, , vol. 25(6), pages 835-855, September.
    3. Minghui Yang & Yan Wang & Lu Bai & Petra Maresova, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility, family involvement, and stock price crash risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1204-1225, May.
    4. Yongqiang Gao & Haibin Yang & Taïeb Hafsi, 2019. "Corporate giving and corporate financial performance: the S-curve relationship," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 687-713, September.
    5. Frederik Plewnia & Edeltraud Guenther, 2017. "The benefits of doing good: a meta-analysis of corporate philanthropy business outcomes and its implications for management control," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 347-376, October.
    6. Cowan, Adrian & Huang, Chia-Hsing & Padmanabhan, Prasad, 2016. "Why do some US manufacturing and service firms with international operations choose to give internationally whereas others opt to give only in the United States?," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 408-418.
    7. Kurt A. Desender & Mircea Epure, 2013. "Corporate governance and corporate social performance: The influence of ownership, boards and institutions," Economics Working Papers 1398, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Oct 2015.
    8. Xiaoling Yu & Kaitian Xiao, 2022. "Does ESG Performance Affect Firm Value? Evidence from a New ESG-Scoring Approach for Chinese Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-40, December.
    9. Chen, Jun & Dong, Wang & Tong, Jamie Yixing & Zhang, Feida Frank, 2018. "Corporate philanthropy and investment efficiency: Empirical evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 392-409.
    10. Kiyoung Chang & Hoje Jo & Ying Li, 2018. "Is there Informational Value in Corporate Giving?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 473-496, August.
    11. Tan, Siow-Hooi & Habibullah, Muzafar & Ong, Hway-Boon & Mohamed, Azali, 2019. "Moderating Effect of Slack Resources on the Charitable Giving and Firm Performance Nexus," Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, vol. 53(3), pages 129-139.
    12. Tahira Naseem & Faisal Shahzad & Ghazanfar Ali Asim & Ijaz Ur Rehman & Faisal Nawaz, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility engagement and firm performance in Asia Pacific: The role of enterprise risk management," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 501-513, March.
    13. Liu, Yaosong & Zhang, Min & Ye, Tingting & Zhang, Yue, 2019. "Does giving always lead to getting? Evidence from the collapse of charity credibility in China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Kurt A. Desender & Mircea Epure, 2015. "Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Performance: The Influence of Boards, Ownership and Institutions," Working Papers 730, Barcelona School of Economics.
    15. Keling Wang & Chien-Pang Lin & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Evelina Gillard, 2018. "The impact of tourism firm’s philanthropy decision on its business objective," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(5), pages 503-509, August.
    16. Chao Zhu & Yuwei Zhang, 2022. "Corporate philanthropic giving and nature of stock market reaction: Evidence from China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1651-1671, September.
    17. Keling Wang & Yaqiong Miao & Ching-Hui (Joan) Su & Ming-Hsiang Chen & Zhongjun Wu & Tie Wang, 2019. "Does Corporate Charitable Giving Help Sustain Corporate Performance in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Ferrell, Allen & Liang, Hao & Renneboog, Luc, 2016. "Socially responsible firms," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 585-606.
    19. Hao Liang & Luc Renneboog, 2017. "Corporate donations and shareholder value," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 33(2), pages 278-316.
    20. Wenbin Sun & Shanji Yao & Rahul Govind, 2019. "Reexamining Corporate Social Responsibility and Shareholder Value: The Inverted-U-Shaped Relationship and the Moderation of Marketing Capability," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 1001-1017, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cross country; Corporate Social Responsibility; corporate financial performance.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • N30 - Economic History - - Labor and Consumers, Demography, Education, Health, Welfare, Income, Wealth, Religion, and Philanthropy - - - General, International, or Comparative

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:ijfirm:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:81-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalfirm.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.