IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral economic insights on index insurance design


  • Michael Carter
  • Ghada Elabed
  • Elena Serfilippi


Purpose - – While behavioral economic experiments have uncovered a wealth of insights concerning how people decide in the face of risk and uncertainty, the implications of these insights for the demand for agricultural insurance are under-explored. The purpose of this paper is to report on results from two recent field experiments that measure the extent to which farmer behavior departs from the predictions of expected utility theory and derives the implications of these departures for insurance demand. Design/methodology/approach - – Framed behavioral field experiments were played with random samples of West African Cotton farmers who lived in areas that were being incorporated into a cotton insurance pilot program. Findings - – Substantial numbers of farmers depart from expected utility behavior in ways that predict excess sensitivity to uncovered basis risk in insurance contracts; and, the fact that insurance premiums are typically framed as certain and unavoidable, while benefits are unknown and stochastic. Originality/value - – Using novel field experimental methods, the work summarized here indicates that more careful design of index insurance contracts in conformity with the findings of behavioral economics could result in larger contract uptake and, ultimately, larger development impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Carter & Ghada Elabed & Elena Serfilippi, 2015. "Behavioral economic insights on index insurance design," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 75(1), pages 8-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:75:y:2015:i:1:p:8-18

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Peilu & Palma, Marco A., 2018. "Compulsory versus Voluntary Insurance: An Online Experiment," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274047, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Stoeffler, Quentin & Wouter, Gelade & Catherine, Guirkinger & Michael, Carter, 2016. "Indirect protection: the impact of cotton insurance on farmers’ income portfolio in Burkina Faso," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235980, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Sulewski, Piotr & Was, Adam, 2018. "Index-based insurance of gross margin in agriculture – key challenges," Problems of Agricultural Economics 276382, Institute of Agricultural and Food Economics - National Research Institute (IAFE-NRI).
    4. Platteau, Jean-Philippe & De Bock, Ombeline & Gelade, Wouter, 2017. "The Demand for Microinsurance: A Literature Review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 139-156.

    More about this item


    Ambiguity aversion; Discontinuous preferences; Index insurance; Risk and uncertainty;

    JEL classification:

    • F - International Economics
    • Z - Other Special Topics


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:75:y:2015:i:1:p:8-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Virginia Chapman). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.