IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v94y2020icp123-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are drivers cool with pool? Driver attitudes towards the shared TNC services UberPool and Lyft Shared

Author

Listed:
  • Morris, Eric A.
  • Zhou, Ying
  • Brown, Anne E.
  • Khan, Sakib M.
  • Derochers, John L.
  • Campbell, Harry
  • Pratt, Angela N.
  • Chowdhury, Mashrur

Abstract

The transportation network companies (TNCs) Uber and Lyft have introduced shared ride services, called “UberPool” and “Lyft Shared,” which use real-time cyber-connectivity to match travelers with similar origins and destinations so they can share discounted rides. It is hoped this will reduce the amount of vehicle miles traveled that TNCs are adding to the roads. However, previous evidence suggests that drivers and passengers have some dissatisfaction with these services. This paper uses a survey of 309 TNC drivers to examine the driver experience with providing shared rides. We find that in the aggregate drivers are considerably less satisfied with providing shared trips compared to solo trips with services such as UberX and Lyft Classic. There are a number of sources of dissatisfaction. Although some feel shared services add to their earnings, more drivers perceive their compensation for shared rides to be unfair. Further, although drivers sometimes enjoy the social interactions that Pool and Shared generate, many drivers complain that customers are often unhappy due to issues like trips taking longer than expected and friction between passengers. Finally, drivers feel serving shared trips is difficult and stressful work, due to things like routing and pick-up instructions that sometimes seem irrational and change frequently, difficult pick-ups and drop-offs, and long trips. We offer suggestions for improving driver satisfaction with Pool/Shared by raising and restructuring driver compensation, better publicizing the ways in which Pool/Shared increase driver incomes, increasing ridership through means such as better advertising of shared services and raising the price of solo travel, improving the information given to drivers, incentivizing good passenger behavior, and improving the passenger experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Morris, Eric A. & Zhou, Ying & Brown, Anne E. & Khan, Sakib M. & Derochers, John L. & Campbell, Harry & Pratt, Angela N. & Chowdhury, Mashrur, 2020. "Are drivers cool with pool? Driver attitudes towards the shared TNC services UberPool and Lyft Shared," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 123-138.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:94:y:2020:i:c:p:123-138
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X19305438
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Keith Chen & Judith A. Chevalier & Peter E. Rossi & Emily Oehlsen, 2019. "The Value of Flexible Work: Evidence from Uber Drivers," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2735-2794.
    2. Rayle, Lisa & Dai, Danielle & Chan, Nelson & Cervero, Robert & Shaheen, Susan, 2016. "Just a better taxi? A survey-based comparison of taxis, transit, and ridesourcing services in San Francisco," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 168-178.
    3. Bharat Chandar & Uri Gneezy & John List & Ian Muir, 2019. "The Drivers of Social Preferences: Evidence from a Nationwide Tipping Field Experiment," Natural Field Experiments 00680, The Field Experiments Website.
    4. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt82w2z91j is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Henao, Alejandro & Marshall, Wesley E., 2019. "An analysis of the individual economics of ride-hailing drivers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 440-451.
    6. repec:cdl:itsrrp:qt60v8r346 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Malalgoda, Narendra & Lim, Siew Hoon, 2019. "Do transportation network companies reduce public transit use in the U.S.?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 351-372.
    8. Furnham, Adrian & Boo, Hua Chu, 2011. "A literature review of the anchoring effect," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 35-42, February.
    9. Hall, Jonathan D. & Palsson, Craig & Price, Joseph, 2018. "Is Uber a substitute or complement for public transit?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 36-50.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:osf:osfxxx:bdah6_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Di, Yining & Xu, Meng & Zhu, Zheng & Yang, Hai & Chen, Xiqun, 2022. "Analysis of ride-sourcing drivers' working Pattern(s) via spatiotemporal work slices: A case study in Hangzhou," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 336-351.
    3. Chandiran, P. & Ramasubramaniam, M. & Venkatesh, V.G. & Mani, Venkatesh & Shi, Yangyan, 2023. "Can driver supply disruption alleviate driver shortages? A systems approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 116-129.
    4. Brown, Anne, 2024. "Driving to Opportunity? Work and Car Access Among Low-Income Ride-Hail and Delivery Drivers," OSF Preprints bdah6, Center for Open Science.
    5. Koley, Souradeep & Kumar Barua, Mukesh & Bisi, Arnab, 2025. "Inhibitors in ridesharing firms from developing Nations: A novel Integrated MCDM – Text Mining approach using Large-Scale data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Portraying ride-hailing mobility using multi-day trip order data: A case study of Beijing, China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 152-169.
    2. Barajas, Jesus M. & Brown, Anne, 2021. "Not minding the gap: Does ride-hailing serve transit deserts?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Ngo, Nicole S. & Götschi, Thomas & Clark, Benjamin Y., 2021. "The effects of ride-hailing services on bus ridership in a medium-sized urban area using micro-level data: Evidence from the Lane Transit District," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 44-53.
    4. Yan, Xiang & Liu, Xinyu & Zhao, Xilei, 2020. "Using machine learning for direct demand modeling of ridesourcing services in Chicago," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. Berger, Thor & Chen, Chinchih & Frey, Carl Benedikt, 2018. "Drivers of disruption? Estimating the Uber effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 197-210.
    6. Agrawal, David R. & Zhao, Weihua, 2023. "Taxing Uber," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    7. Brown, Anne, 2022. "Not all fees are created equal: Equity implications of ride-hail fee structures and revenues," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-10.
    8. Lee, Yongsung & Lee, Bumsoo, 2022. "What’s eating public transit in the United States? Reasons for declining transit ridership in the 2010s," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 126-143.
    9. Omberg, Tucker, 2024. "The labor market impacts of ridesharing on American Cities," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    10. Erhardt, Gregory D. & Hoque, Jawad Mahmud & Goyal, Vedant & Berrebi, Simon & Brakewood, Candace & Watkins, Kari E., 2022. "Why has public transit ridership declined in the United States?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 68-87.
    11. Cody Cook & Rebecca Diamond & Jonathan V Hall & John A List & Paul Oyer, 2021. "The Gender Earnings Gap in the Gig Economy: Evidence from over a Million Rideshare Drivers [Measuring the Gig Economy: Current Knowledge and Open Issues]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2210-2238.
    12. Fayed, Lynn & Nilsson, Gustav & Geroliminis, Nikolas, 2023. "On the utilization of dedicated bus lanes for pooled ride-hailing services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 29-52.
    13. Henao, Alejandro & Marshall, Wesley E., 2019. "An analysis of the individual economics of ride-hailing drivers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 440-451.
    14. Dean, Matthew D. & Kockelman, Kara M., 2021. "Spatial variation in shared ride-hail trip demand and factors contributing to sharing: Lessons from Chicago," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    15. Teltser, Keith & Lennon, Conor & Burgdorf, Jacob, 2021. "Do ridesharing services increase alcohol consumption?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    16. Kong, Hui & Zhang, Xiaohu & Zhao, Jinhua, 2020. "How does ridesourcing substitute for public transit? A geospatial perspective in Chengdu, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    17. Young, Mischa & Allen, Jeff & Farber, Steven, 2020. "Measuring when Uber behaves as a substitute or supplement to transit: An examination of travel-time differences in Toronto," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    18. Lennon, Conor & Maclean, Johanna Catherine & Teltser, Keith, 2025. "Ridesharing and substance use disorder treatment," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    19. Cortina, Mélanie & Chiabaut, Nicolas & Leclercq, Ludovic, 2023. "Fostering synergy between transit and Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand systems: A dynamic modeling approach for the morning commute problem," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    20. Oded Cats & Rafal Kucharski & Santosh Rao Danda & Menno Yap, 2022. "Beyond the dichotomy: How ride-hailing competes with and complements public transport," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-17, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:94:y:2020:i:c:p:123-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.