IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v52y2016icp186-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban bus network of priority lanes: A combined multi-objective, multi-criteria and group decision-making approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hadas, Yuval
  • Nahum, Oren E.

Abstract

This study presents a multi-objective approach for selecting an optimal network of public transport (PT) priority lanes. Bus priority schemes and techniques on urban roads and highways have proven effective for increasing reliability, efficiency, and faster travel times. This study develops a multi-objective model for selecting an optimal PT priority lanes network that 1) maximizes total travel time savings; 2) maintains balanced origin and destination terminals; and 3) minimizes the construction budget. In contrast to commonly used single objective models, which must be executed numerous times in order to provide the decision-maker with feasible solutions, multi-objective models exhibit a complete set of feasible and optimal solutions with a single execution. Since the major disadvantage of a multi-objective model is the need to select a preferred solution from a set, a multi-criteria approach was developed for: 1) ranking each decision-maker's solutions; and 2) selecting a compromise solution acceptable to a group of decision-makers. This methodology is demonstrated with a case study of Petah Tikva, a medium-sized city in Israel.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadas, Yuval & Nahum, Oren E., 2016. "Urban bus network of priority lanes: A combined multi-objective, multi-criteria and group decision-making approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 186-196.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:52:y:2016:i:c:p:186-196
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X16305170
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Johanna Camargo Pérez & Martha Carrillo & Jairo Montoya-Torres, 2015. "Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: a literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 69-87, March.
    2. Eichler, Michael & Daganzo, Carlos F., 2006. "Bus lanes with intermittent priority: Strategy formulae and an evaluation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 731-744, November.
    3. Yan, Shangyao & Chen, Hao-Lei, 2002. "A scheduling model and a solution algorithm for inter-city bus carriers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 805-825, November.
    4. Peter C. Fishburn, 1974. "Exceptional Paper--Lexicographic Orders, Utilities and Decision Rules: A Survey," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(11), pages 1442-1471, July.
    5. Roy, Bernard, 1990. "Decision-aid and decision-making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(2-3), pages 324-331, April.
    6. Leyva-Lopez, Juan Carlos & Fernandez-Gonzalez, Eduardo, 2003. "A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 14-27, July.
    7. Asadi Bagloee, Saeed & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2011. "Transit-network design methodology for actual-size road networks," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1787-1804.
    8. Turnquist, Mark A. & Bowman, Larry A., 1980. "The effects of network structure on reliability of transit service," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 14(1-2), pages 79-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zengliang Han & Dongqing Wang & Feng Liu & Zhiyong Zhao, 2017. "Multi-AGV path planning with double-path constraints by using an improved genetic algorithm," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Karthik, P.N. & Rathod, Nihesh & Yasodharan, Sarath & Lobo, Wilson & Sahadevan, Ajeesh & Sundaresan, Rajesh & Verma, Pratik, 2023. "Bus priority lane in Bengaluru: A study on its effectiveness and driver stress," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 39-62.
    3. Dias, Luis C. & Dias, Joana & Ventura, Tiago & Rocha, Humberto & Ferreira, Brígida & Khouri, Leila & Lopes, Maria do Carmo, 2022. "Learning target-based preferences through additive models: An application in radiotherapy treatment planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 270-279.
    4. Mustafa Hamurcu & Tamer Eren, 2020. "Strategic Planning Based on Sustainability for Urban Transportation: An Application to Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-24, April.
    5. Patel, Samir J. & Patel, Chetan R., 2020. "A stakeholders perspective on improving barriers in implementation of public bicycle sharing system (PBSS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 353-366.
    6. Wenz, Klaus-Peter & Serrano-Guerrero, Xavier & Barragán-Escandón, Antonio & González, L.G. & Clairand, Jean-Michel, 2021. "Route prioritization of urban public transportation from conventional to electric buses: A new methodology and a study of case in an intermediate city of Ecuador," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Govindan, Kannan & Jepsen, Martin Brandt, 2016. "ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 1-29.
    2. Ahern, Zeke & Paz, Alexander & Corry, Paul, 2022. "Approximate multi-objective optimization for integrated bus route design and service frequency setting," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 1-25.
    3. Javier Duran & Lorena Pradenas & Victor Parada, 2019. "Transit network design with pollution minimization," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 189-210, June.
    4. Yi-Fong Lin, 2022. "Solution Approach for Bus Transit Model with a Rectangular Service Area," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-14, February.
    5. Mohammad-Reza Namazi-Rad & Michelle Dunbar & Hadi Ghaderi & Payam Mokhtarian, 2015. "Constrained Optimization of Average Arrival Time via a Probabilistic Approach to Transport Reliability," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, May.
    6. Andreas Glöckner, 2009. "Investigating intuitive and deliberate processes statistically: The multiple-measure maximum likelihood strategy classification method," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(3), pages 186-199, April.
    7. Petri, Henrik & Voorneveld, Mark, 2016. "Characterizing lexicographic preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 54-61.
    8. Alessandro Vitale & Giuseppe Guido & Daniele Rogano, 2016. "A smartphone based DSS platform for assessing transit service attributes," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 315-340, September.
    9. Juan Candeal, 2013. "Invariance axioms for preferences: applications to social choice theory," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(3), pages 453-471, September.
    10. Shangyao Yan & Chun-Ying Chen & Chuan-Che Wu, 2012. "Solution methods for the taxi pooling problem," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 723-748, May.
    11. Mandler, Michael, 2015. "Rational agents are the quickest," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 206-233.
    12. Guercini, Simone & Milanesi, Matilde, 2020. "Heuristics in international business: A systematic literature review and directions for future research," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4).
    13. Tsoukias, Alexis, 2008. "From decision theory to decision aiding methodology," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 138-161, May.
    14. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    15. repec:cup:judgdm:v:8:y:2013:i:5:p:552-560 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Zheng Yuan & Baohua Wen & Cheng He & Jin Zhou & Zhonghua Zhou & Feng Xu, 2022. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Analysis to Rural Spatial Sustainability Evaluation: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-31, May.
    17. Battal Doğan & Kemal Yildiz, 2023. "Choice with Affirmative Action," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2284-2296, April.
    18. Noori, Amir & Bonakdari, Hossein & Salimi, Amir Hossein & Gharabaghi, Bahram, 2021. "A group Multi-Criteria Decision-Making method for water supply choice optimization," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    19. P. S. Nagpaul & Santanu Roy, 2003. "Constructing a multi-objective measure of research performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 56(3), pages 383-402, March.
    20. Amitrajeet Batabyal, 2007. "A probabilistic analysis of a scheduling problem in the economics of tourism," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 12(4), pages 1-7.
    21. Giuseppe Munda, 2003. "Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE)," UHE Working papers 2003_04, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Departament d'Economia i Història Econòmica, Unitat d'Història Econòmica.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:52:y:2016:i:c:p:186-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.