IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v170y2025icp137-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting for uncertainties in cost-benefit analyses of road projects: A procedure illustrated by real-world projects

Author

Listed:
  • Tveter, Eivind
  • Welde, Morten
  • Odeck, James

Abstract

A critical step in the road investment decision-making process is to conduct cost-benefit analyses (CBAs) to assess the net social benefit of project alternatives. CBA results are often presented to decision-makers as point estimates. However, such results rely on numerous forecasts, parameters, and unit values, which introduce uncertainty. This paper adds to the literature on transport CBAs by evaluating how their inherent uncertainty can be considered by analysts and presented to decision-makers. We develop a Monte Carlo simulation procedure that uses variations in the most critical factors related to CBAs. We apply this procedure to a set of projects to demonstrate how it could inform decision-makers in terms of the uncertainties involved in CBAs. We show that if analysts present ranges or confidence intervals, decision-makers may make other choices that differ from those based on point estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Tveter, Eivind & Welde, Morten & Odeck, James, 2025. "Accounting for uncertainties in cost-benefit analyses of road projects: A procedure illustrated by real-world projects," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 137-146.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:170:y:2025:i:c:p:137-146
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.05.012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2500191X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.05.012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:170:y:2025:i:c:p:137-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.