IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v194y2025ics1366554524005350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What does intelligentization bring? A perspective from the impact of mental workload on operational risk

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Sihua
  • Wen, Xiang
  • Ke, Shengpan
  • Ni, Qingmiao
  • Xu, Ruicheng
  • He, Wei

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is becoming the new foundation of companies’ business operations. The nature of “technical staff” work is changing as a result of artificial intelligence, affecting their mental workload. According to multiple resource theory, both mental underload and overload might result in operational mishaps. We recruited high-speed rail (HSR) drivers from the transportation industry and stock traders from the financial industry to conduct experiments to verify the relationship between mental workload and operational risk under varying levels of intelligentization. The findings indicate that mental workload has a detrimental impact on operational risk. However, beyond a certain threshold, it has the reverse effect on operational risk. That is, there is a U-shaped relationship between mental workload and operational risk. Furthermore, intelligentization makes the U-shaped curve steeper, enhancing the impact of mental workload on operational risk. To investigate the influence of mental workload on operational risk at various levels of intelligentization, we created a simulation program using the simulink tool. The simulation results confirm the empirical study, revealing that the U-shaped operating risk curve is driven by HSR drivers’ distraction and stress, fatigue has little effect on operational risk. We found that under non-emergency conditions, HSR drivers with higher levels of intelligentization experience a lower mental workload compared to those operating less intelligent trains. However, in emergency situations, although the former’s mental workload is greater than the latter’s, the instantaneous change in mental workload is significantly larger. As a result, under emergency conditions, HSR drivers with higher levels of intelligentization face greater operational risk. The conclusions of this paper have multiple managerial implications for transportation companies.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Sihua & Wen, Xiang & Ke, Shengpan & Ni, Qingmiao & Xu, Ruicheng & He, Wei, 2025. "What does intelligentization bring? A perspective from the impact of mental workload on operational risk," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:194:y:2025:i:c:s1366554524005350
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103944
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524005350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103944?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Merkert, Rico & Swidan, Hassan, 2019. "Flying with(out) a safety net: Financial hedging in the airline industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 206-219.
    2. Nguyen, Son & Shu-Ling Chen, Peggy & Du, Yuquan, 2022. "Risk assessment of maritime container shipping blockchain-integrated systems: An analysis of multi-event scenarios," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    3. Zhou, Yonghua & Tao, Xin & Luan, Lei & Ning, Jingjie, 2018. "Revisiting the 7/23 train accident using computer reconstruction simulation for causation and prevention analysis," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1-15.
    4. Nguyen, Son & Chen, Peggy Shu-Ling & Du, Yuquan & Shi, Wenming, 2019. "A quantitative risk analysis model with integrated deliberative Delphi platform for container shipping operational risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 203-227.
    5. Jonathan R. Clark & Robert S. Huckman & Bradley R. Staats, 2013. "Learning from Customers: Individual and Organizational Effects in Outsourced Radiological Services," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(5), pages 1539-1557, October.
    6. Nazareno, Luísa & Schiff, Daniel S., 2021. "The impact of automation and artificial intelligence on worker well-being," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Yuqian Xu & Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine, 2022. "The Impact of Workload on Operational Risk: Evidence from a Commercial Bank," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2668-2693, April.
    8. Zhan, Shuguang & Xie, Jiemin & Wong, S.C. & Zhu, Yongqiu & Corman, Francesco, 2024. "Handling uncertainty in train timetable rescheduling: A review of the literature and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Wang-Sheng Lee, 2013. "Propensity score matching and variations on the balancing test," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 47-80, February.
    10. Zhou, Fei & Lin, Youhai & Mou, Jian & Cohen, Jason & Chen, Sihua, 2023. "Understanding the dark side of gamified interactions on short-form video platforms: Through a lens of expectations violations theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    11. Arakawa, Toshiya & Hibi, Ryosuke & Fujishiro, Taka-aki, 2019. "Psychophysical assessment of a driver’s mental state in autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 587-610.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surucu-Balci, Ebru & Iris, Çağatay & Balci, Gökcay, 2024. "Digital information in maritime supply chains with blockchain and cloud platforms: Supply chain capabilities, barriers, and research opportunities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Feng, Yinwei & Wang, Xinjian & Chen, Qilei & Yang, Zaili & Wang, Jin & Li, Huanhuan & Xia, Guoqing & Liu, Zhengjiang, 2024. "Prediction of the severity of marine accidents using improved machine learning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    3. Wenlian Gao & Feifei Zhu & Kai Chen, 2023. "The role of bank lenders in firm leverage adjustments," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 46(1), pages 63-97, February.
    4. Michael C. Knaus, 2021. "A double machine learning approach to estimate the effects of musical practice on student’s skills," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(1), pages 282-300, January.
    5. John F Helliwell & Shun Wang, 2015. "How Was the Weekend? How the Social Context Underlies Weekend Effects in Happiness and Other Emotions for US Workers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(12), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Jiang, Meizhi & Lu, Jing, 2020. "The analysis of maritime piracy occurred in Southeast Asia by using Bayesian network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    7. Weneyam Hippolyte Balima & Jean-Louis Combes & Alexandru Minea, 2015. "Sovereign Debt Risk in Emerging Countries: Does Inflation Targeting Adoption Make Any Difference?," CERDI Working papers halshs-01128239, HAL.
    8. Swidan, Hassan & Merkert, Rico & Kwon, Oh Kang, 2019. "Designing optimal jet fuel hedging strategies for airlines – Why hedging will not always reduce risk exposure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 20-36.
    9. Browning, Martin & Crossley, Thomas F., 2008. "The long-run cost of job loss as measured by consumption changes," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1-2), pages 109-120, July.
    10. Turja, Tuuli & Särkikoski, Tuomo & Koistinen, Pertti & Melin, Harri, 2022. "Basic human needs and robotization: How to make deployment of robots worthwhile for everyone?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Michele Campolieti & Morley Gunderson & Jeffrey Smith, 2014. "The effect of vocational rehabilitation on the employment outcomes of disability insurance beneficiaries: new evidence from Canada," IZA Journal of Labor Policy, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 3(1), pages 1-29, December.
    12. Tim Hinks, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Perceptions and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Borchert, Philipp & Coussement, Kristof & De Weerdt, Jochen & De Caigny, Arno, 2024. "Industry-sensitive language modeling for business," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 691-702.
    14. Zhou, Yusheng & Li, Xue & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2022. "Holistic risk assessment of container shipping service based on Bayesian Network Modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    15. Kuhn, Marc & Reit, Vanessa & Schwing, Maximilian & Selinka, Sarah, 2024. "“Let the Driver off the Hook?” moral decisions of autonomous cars and their impact on consumer well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    16. Dan Pan, 2014. "The Impact of Agricultural Extension on Farmer Nutrient Management Behavior in Chinese Rice Production: A Household-Level Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(10), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Li, Huanhuan & Ren, Xujie & Yang, Zaili, 2023. "Data-driven Bayesian network for risk analysis of global maritime accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    18. Paudel, G. & Krishna, V. & McDonald, A., 2018. "Why some inferior technologies succeed? Examining the diffusion and impacts of rotavator tillage in Nepal Terai," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277149, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Balaine, Lorraine & Dillon, Emma J. & Läpple, Doris & Lynch, John, 2020. "Can technology help achieve sustainable intensification? Evidence from milk recording on Irish dairy farms," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Martin Biewen & Bernd Fitzenberger & Aderonke Osikominu & Marie Paul, 2014. "The Effectiveness of Public-Sponsored Training Revisited: The Importance of Data and Methodological Choices," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32(4), pages 837-897.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:194:y:2025:i:c:s1366554524005350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.