IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v114y2018icp196-219.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A risk-averse location-protection problem under intentional facility disruptions: A modified hybrid decomposition algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Jalali, Sajjad
  • Seifbarghy, Mehdi
  • Niaki, Seyed Taghi Akhavan

Abstract

The rising disruptions of interdictors force supply chains’ designers to embody the protection decisions when locating the facilities. In the presence of variability in the intensity of disruptions, a risk measure is incorporated into the decision-making. The designer-interdictor bi-level problem, therefore, optimizes the joint location and protection decisions with respect to the conditional value-at-risk. This configuration has been absent from the literature. An accelerated modified Benders decomposition algorithm is developed and enhanced by being hybridized with a sample average approximation-based genetic algorithm. We examine how this new configuration influences the optimal solutions and assess the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Jalali, Sajjad & Seifbarghy, Mehdi & Niaki, Seyed Taghi Akhavan, 2018. "A risk-averse location-protection problem under intentional facility disruptions: A modified hybrid decomposition algorithm," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 196-219.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:114:y:2018:i:c:p:196-219
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2018.04.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554517310189
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2018.04.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birendra Rai & Rajiv Sarin, 2009. "Generalized contest success functions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 40(1), pages 139-149, July.
    2. Bricha, Naji & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2015. "Protection of warehouses and plants under capacity constraint," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 93-104.
    3. Yamai, Yasuhiro & Yoshiba, Toshinao, 2002. "Comparative Analyses of Expected Shortfall and Value-at-Risk: Their Estimation Error, Decomposition, and Optimization," Monetary and Economic Studies, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan, vol. 20(1), pages 87-121, January.
    4. Kjell Hausken, 2011. "Protecting complex infrastructures against multiple strategic attackers," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 11-29.
    5. Lixin Tang & Wei Jiang & Georgios Saharidis, 2013. "An improved Benders decomposition algorithm for the logistics facility location problem with capacity expansions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 165-190, November.
    6. Tingting Cui & Yanfeng Ouyang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 998-1011, August.
    7. Bricha, Naji & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2014. "Extra-capacity versus protection for supply networks under attack," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 185-196.
    8. Jiang, J. & Liu, X., 2018. "Multi-objective Stackelberg game model for water supply networks against interdictions with incomplete information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 920-933.
    9. Zhang, Ying & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Ralphs, Ted K. & Xue, Zhaojie, 2016. "The competitive facility location problem under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 453-473.
    10. Chen, Dongxu & Yang, Zhongzhen, 2018. "Systematic optimization of port clusters along the Maritime Silk Road in the context of industry transfer and production capacity constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 174-189.
    11. Poojari, C.A. & Beasley, J.E., 2009. "Improving benders decomposition using a genetic algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(1), pages 89-97, November.
    12. O'Hanley, Jesse R. & Church, Richard L., 2011. "Designing robust coverage networks to hedge against worst-case facility losses," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(1), pages 23-36, February.
    13. Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Peng, Rui, 2018. "Object defense with preventive strike and false targets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 76-80.
    14. D Gade & E A Pohl, 2009. "Sample average approximation applied to the capacitated-facilities location problem with unreliable facilities," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 223(4), pages 259-269, December.
    15. Karakose, Gokhan & McGarvey, Ronald G., 2018. "Capacitated path-aggregation constraint model for arc disruption in networks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 225-238.
    16. Schütz, Peter & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Ahmed, Shabbir, 2009. "Supply chain design under uncertainty using sample average approximation and dual decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 409-419, December.
    17. T. L. Magnanti & R. T. Wong, 1981. "Accelerating Benders Decomposition: Algorithmic Enhancement and Model Selection Criteria," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 464-484, June.
    18. Perea, Federico & Puerto, Justo, 2013. "Revisiting a game theoretic framework for the robust railway network design against intentional attacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 286-292.
    19. Cui, Tingting & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max J, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design under the Risk of Disruptions," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5sh2c7pw, University of California Transportation Center.
    20. Zuo-Jun Max Shen & Roger Lezhou Zhan & Jiawei Zhang, 2011. "The Reliable Facility Location Problem: Formulations, Heuristics, and Approximation Algorithms," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 23(3), pages 470-482, August.
    21. An, Yu & Zeng, Bo & Zhang, Yu & Zhao, Long, 2014. "Reliable p-median facility location problem: two-stage robust models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 54-72.
    22. Yu, Guodong & Haskell, William B. & Liu, Yang, 2017. "Resilient facility location against the risk of disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 82-105.
    23. Gedik, Ridvan & Medal, Hugh & Rainwater, Chase & Pohl, Ed A. & Mason, Scott J., 2014. "Vulnerability assessment and re-routing of freight trains under disruptions: A coal supply chain network application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 45-57.
    24. Losada, Chaya & Scaparra, M. Paola & O’Hanley, Jesse R., 2012. "Optimizing system resilience: A facility protection model with recovery time," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 217(3), pages 519-530.
    25. Chen Wang & Vicki M. Bier, 2016. "Quantifying Adversary Capabilities to Inform Defensive Resource Allocation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 756-775, April.
    26. Bricha, Naji & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2013. "Critical supply network protection against intentional attacks: A game-theoretical model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 1-10.
    27. Quaranta, Anna Grazia & Zaffaroni, Alberto, 2008. "Robust optimization of conditional value at risk and portfolio selection," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(10), pages 2046-2056, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhu, Xiaoyan & Cao, Yunzhi, 2021. "The optimal recovery-fund based strategy for uncertain supply chain disruptions: A risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    2. Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2022. "Facility Location in Logistics and Transportation: An enduring relationship," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    3. Sinha, Priyank & Kumar, Sameer & Chandra, Charu, 2023. "Strategies for ensuring required service level for COVID-19 herd immunity in Indian vaccine supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(1), pages 339-352.
    4. Parajuli, Anubhuti & Kuzgunkaya, Onur & Vidyarthi, Navneet, 2021. "The impact of congestion on protection decisions in supply networks under disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    5. Samani, Mohammad Reza Ghatreh & Hosseini-Motlagh, Seyyed-Mahdi & Homaei, Shamim, 2020. "A reactive phase against disruptions for designing a proactive platelet supply network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    6. Li, Yanhai & Gu, Chaocheng & Ou, Jinwen, 2020. "Supporting a financially constrained supplier under spectral risk measures: The efficiency of buyer lending," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    7. Liu, Yang & Cui, Na & Zhang, Jianghua, 2019. "Integrated temporary facility location and casualty allocation planning for post-disaster humanitarian medical service," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 1-16.
    8. Li, Qing & Li, Mingchu & Tian, Yuan & Gan, Jianyuan, 2023. "A risk-averse tri-level stochastic model for locating and recovering facilities against attacks in an uncertain environment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    9. Li, Qing & Li, Mingchu & Zhang, Runfa & Gan, Jianyuan, 2021. "A stochastic bilevel model for facility location-protection problem with the most likely interdiction strategy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    10. Li, Qing & Li, Mingchu & Gong, Zhongqiang & Tian, Yuan & Zhang, Runfa, 2022. "Locating and protecting interdependent facilities to hedge against multiple non-cooperative limited choice attackers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    2. Nader Azad & Elkafi Hassini, 2019. "A Benders Decomposition Method for Designing Reliable Supply Chain Networks Accounting for Multimitigation Strategies and Demand Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1287-1312, September.
    3. Zhang, Ying & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Ralphs, Ted K. & Xue, Zhaojie, 2016. "The competitive facility location problem under disruption risks," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 453-473.
    4. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    5. Cheng, Chun & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2021. "Robust facility location under demand uncertainty and facility disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Li, Qing & Li, Mingchu & Gong, Zhongqiang & Tian, Yuan & Zhang, Runfa, 2022. "Locating and protecting interdependent facilities to hedge against multiple non-cooperative limited choice attackers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    7. Abdolreza Roshani & Philip Walker-Davies & Glenn Parry, 2024. "Designing resilient supply chain networks: a systematic literature review of mitigation strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1267-1332, October.
    8. O’Hanley, Jesse R. & Scaparra, M. Paola & García, Sergio, 2013. "Probability chains: A general linearization technique for modeling reliability in facility location and related problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 230(1), pages 63-75.
    9. Zhang, Ying & Qi, Mingyao & Lin, Wei-Hua & Miao, Lixin, 2015. "A metaheuristic approach to the reliable location routing problem under disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 90-110.
    10. Álvarez-Miranda, Eduardo & Fernández, Elena & Ljubić, Ivana, 2015. "The recoverable robust facility location problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 93-120.
    11. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.
    12. Cheng, Chun & Qi, Mingyao & Zhang, Ying & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2018. "A two-stage robust approach for the reliable logistics network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 185-202.
    13. Mengshi Lu & Lun Ran & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under Uncertain Correlated Disruptions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 445-455, October.
    14. Chaya Losada & M. Scaparra & Richard Church & Mark Daskin, 2012. "The stochastic interdiction median problem with disruption intensity levels," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 201(1), pages 345-365, December.
    15. Starita, Stefano & Scaparra, Maria Paola, 2016. "Optimizing dynamic investment decisions for railway systems protection," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 543-557.
    16. Basciftci, Beste & Ahmed, Shabbir & Shen, Siqian, 2021. "Distributionally robust facility location problem under decision-dependent stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(2), pages 548-561.
    17. Ivanov, Dmitry & Pavlov, Alexander & Dolgui, Alexandre & Pavlov, Dmitry & Sokolov, Boris, 2016. "Disruption-driven supply chain (re)-planning and performance impact assessment with consideration of pro-active and recovery policies," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 7-24.
    18. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    19. Espejo, Inmaculada & Marín, Alfredo & Rodríguez-Chía, Antonio M., 2015. "Capacitated p-center problem with failure foresight," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 229-244.
    20. Cheng, Chun & Yu, Qinxiao & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2024. "Distributionally robust facility location with uncertain facility capacity and customer demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:114:y:2018:i:c:p:196-219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.