IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v355y2025i3d10.1007_s10479-024-05916-7.html

Reliable design of humanitarian supply chain under correlated disruptions: a two-stage distributionally robust approach

Author

Listed:
  • ChangJun Wang

    (Donghua University, Glorious Sun School of Business and Management)

  • Li-Meng-Tao Zhong

    (Sichuan University, Business School)

Abstract

This paper considers a humanitarian supply chain (SC) under uncertain correlated disruptions of facilities caused by unpredictable disasters. Prepositioned relief items in these facilities might be partly damaged. Hence, it is of great importance to design a reliable SC to mitigate the disruptions. However, the challenge is that the joint disruption distribution is usually unavailable due to the scarcity of disaster data. To address this issue, our study considers that only the disruption probability of each relief item storage point is known, and develops a two-stage distributionally robust optimization (DRO) model based on the ambiguity set under the given marginal failure probabilities. Multiple resilience strategies are optimized in an integrated way, including inventory prepositioning strategy and often-used relief activities, e.g., relief item replenishment, transshipment, and demand transfer. We uncover the relationship between the worst-case joint distribution and supermodular order by exploring the structure–property of the recourse model, which is a generic relief logistics problem, and then identify the closed-form worst-case disruption distribution that lies within the ambiguity set for the robust counterpart. Thus, an equivalent stochastic program is formulated to address the intractability of the two-stage DRO. To validate its applicability, the proposed approach is applied to address the reliable design of a blood SC, in which pre-stocked human blood in hospitals may be partly ruined in disasters. Finally, a real-world case study of the Longmenshan Fault in China is performed. The sensitivity analysis and out-of-sample test are also implemented to give findings and insights. Our study reveals how to strategically preposition inventory with the consideration of disruptive facilities (uncertain correlations and geographic positions), relief items (perishability and shortage penalty), other anti-disaster strategies, as well as the two-stage decision-making way. Thus, our work addresses the reliable SC design under uncertain correlation by efficiently utilizing the minimal disruption information and developing a computationally tractable way.

Suggested Citation

  • ChangJun Wang & Li-Meng-Tao Zhong, 2025. "Reliable design of humanitarian supply chain under correlated disruptions: a two-stage distributionally robust approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 355(3), pages 2999-3047, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:355:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05916-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-024-05916-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-024-05916-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-024-05916-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. E. Koks & J. Rozenberg & C. Zorn & M. Tariverdi & M. Vousdoukas & S. A. Fraser & J. W. Hall & S. Hallegatte, 2019. "A global multi-hazard risk analysis of road and railway infrastructure assets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Tang, Christopher S., 2006. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(2), pages 451-488, October.
    3. Andres F. Osorio & Sally C. Brailsford & Honora K. Smith, 2015. "A structured review of quantitative models in the blood supply chain: a taxonomic framework for decision-making," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(24), pages 7191-7212, December.
    4. Cheng, Chun & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2021. "Robust facility location under demand uncertainty and facility disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Soheyl Khalilpourazari & Shima Soltanzadeh & Gerhard-Wilhelm Weber & Sankar Kumar Roy, 2020. "Designing an efficient blood supply chain network in crisis: neural learning, optimization and case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 289(1), pages 123-152, June.
    6. Mohammad Reza Ghatreh Samani & Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh, 2019. "An enhanced procedure for managing blood supply chain under disruptions and uncertainties," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1413-1462, December.
    7. Chen, Qi & Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2011. "Joint inventory-location problem under the risk of probabilistic facility disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 991-1003, August.
    8. Mengshi Lu & Lun Ran & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under Uncertain Correlated Disruptions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 445-455, October.
    9. Marco Di Summa & Syed Md Omar Faruk, 2023. "Critical node/edge detection problems on trees," 4OR, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 439-455, September.
    10. Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Kuo, Hsin-Tsz, 2022. "Emergency logistics management—Review and propositions for future research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    11. Hao Shen & Yong Liang & Zuo‐Jun Max Shen & Chung‐Piaw Teo, 2019. "Reliable Flexibility Design of Supply Chains Via Extended Probabilistic Expanders," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(3), pages 700-720, March.
    12. Tingting Cui & Yanfeng Ouyang & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under the Risk of Disruptions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(4-part-1), pages 998-1011, August.
    13. Bahjat F. Qaqish, 2003. "A family of multivariate binary distributions for simulating correlated binary variables with specified marginal means and correlations," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 90(2), pages 455-463, June.
    14. Li, Xiaopeng & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Peng, Fan, 2013. "A supporting station model for reliable infrastructure location design under interdependent disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 80-93.
    15. Cui, Tingting & Ouyang, Yanfeng & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max J, 2010. "Reliable Facility Location Design under the Risk of Disruptions," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5sh2c7pw, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Shipra Agrawal & Yichuan Ding & Amin Saberi & Yinyu Ye, 2012. "Price of Correlations in Stochastic Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 150-162, February.
    17. An, Yu & Zeng, Bo & Zhang, Yu & Zhao, Long, 2014. "Reliable p-median facility location problem: two-stage robust models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 54-72.
    18. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: A robust model with real world application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 225-244.
    19. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    20. Xie, Siyang & An, Kun & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2019. "Planning facility location under generally correlated facility disruptions: Use of supporting stations and quasi-probabilities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 115-139.
    21. Yu, Guodong & Haskell, William B. & Liu, Yang, 2017. "Resilient facility location against the risk of disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 82-105.
    22. Bo Feng & Zheyu Jiang & Fujun Lai, 2020. "Robust approach for air cargo freight forwarder selection under disruption," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 339-360, August.
    23. Wang, Changjun & Chen, Shutong, 2020. "A distributionally robust optimization for blood supply network considering disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    24. Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Jula, Payman & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza, 2019. "Reliable single-allocation hub location problem with disruptions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 90-120.
    25. Cao, Yunzhi & Zhu, Xiaoyan & Yan, Houmin, 2022. "Data-driven Wasserstein distributionally robust mitigation and recovery against random supply chain disruption," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    26. Fattahi, Mohammad & Govindan, Kannan & Maihami, Reza, 2020. "Stochastic optimization of disruption-driven supply chain network design with a new resilience metric," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    27. Dönmez, Zehranaz & Kara, Bahar Y. & Karsu, Özlem & Saldanha-da-Gama, Francisco, 2021. "Humanitarian facility location under uncertainty: Critical review and future prospects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    28. Erick Delage & Yinyu Ye, 2010. "Distributionally Robust Optimization Under Moment Uncertainty with Application to Data-Driven Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(3), pages 595-612, June.
    29. German A. Velasquez & Maria E. Mayorga & Osman Y. Özaltın, 2020. "Prepositioning disaster relief supplies using robust optimization," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(10), pages 1122-1140, October.
    30. Cheng, Chun & Qi, Mingyao & Zhang, Ying & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2018. "A two-stage robust approach for the reliable logistics network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 185-202.
    31. Soheyl Khalilpourazari & Hossein Hashemi Doulabi, 2023. "A flexible robust model for blood supply chain network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 328(1), pages 701-726, September.
    32. Peng, Peng & Snyder, Lawrence V. & Lim, Andrew & Liu, Zuli, 2011. "Reliable logistics networks design with facility disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1190-1211, September.
    33. Wong, Ross Y.M. & Tso, C.Y. & Jeong, S.Y. & Fu, S.C. & Chao, Christopher Y.H., 2023. "Critical sky temperatures for passive radiative cooling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 214-226.
    34. Yusen Ye & Wen Jiao & Hong Yan, 2020. "Managing Relief Inventories Responding to Natural Disasters: Gaps Between Practice and Literature," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 807-832, April.
    35. Mohammad Reza Ghatreh Samani & Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh, 2021. "A robust framework for designing blood network in disaster relief: a real-life case," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 1529-1568, September.
    36. repec:inm:orijoo:v:3:y:2021:i:3:p:298-314 is not listed on IDEAS
    37. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    38. Lawrence V. Snyder & Zümbül Atan & Peng Peng & Ying Rong & Amanda J. Schmitt & Burcu Sinsoysal, 2016. "OR/MS models for supply chain disruptions: a review," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(2), pages 89-109, February.
    39. John M. Mulvey & Robert J. Vanderbei & Stavros A. Zenios, 1995. "Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 43(2), pages 264-281, April.
    40. Elmira Farrokhizadeh & Seyed Amin Seyfi-Shishavan & Sule Itir Satoglu, 2022. "Blood supply planning during natural disasters under uncertainty: a novel bi-objective model and an application for red crescent," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 73-113, December.
    41. Zhang, Yanzi & Diabat, Ali & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "Reliable closed-loop supply chain design problem under facility-type-dependent probabilistic disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 180-209.
    42. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Morshedlou, Nazanin & Ivanov, Dmitry & Sarder, M.D. & Barker, Kash & Khaled, Abdullah Al, 2019. "Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 124-137.
    43. Lawrence V. Snyder & Mark S. Daskin, 2005. "Reliability Models for Facility Location: The Expected Failure Cost Case," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 400-416, August.
    44. Sara Cheraghi & Seyyed-Mahdi Hosseini-Motlagh, 2020. "Responsive and reliable injured-oriented blood supply chain for disaster relief: a real case study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 129-167, August.
    45. Abhishek Behl & Pankaj Dutta, 2019. "Humanitarian supply chain management: a thematic literature review and future directions of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1001-1044, December.
    46. Garvey, Myles D. & Carnovale, Steven, 2020. "The rippled newsvendor: A new inventory framework for modeling supply chain risk severity in the presence of risk propagation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    47. Seyed Amin Seyfi-Shishavan & Yaser Donyatalab & Elmira Farrokhizadeh & Sule Itır Satoglu, 2023. "A fuzzy optimization model for designing an efficient blood supply chain network under uncertainty and disruption," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 331(1), pages 447-501, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldrighetti, Riccardo & Battini, Daria & Ivanov, Dmitry & Zennaro, Ilenia, 2021. "Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Luo, Lan & Li, Xiangyong & Zhao, Yuxuan, 2025. "A two-stage stochastic-robust model for supply chain network design problem under disruptions and endogenous demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Abdolreza Roshani & Philip Walker-Davies & Glenn Parry, 2024. "Designing resilient supply chain networks: a systematic literature review of mitigation strategies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1267-1332, October.
    4. Lu, Xiaohan & Cheng, Chun, 2021. "Locating facilities with resiliency to capacity failures and correlated demand uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    5. Cheng, Chun & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2021. "Robust facility location under demand uncertainty and facility disruptions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    6. Zhang, Yanzi & Diabat, Ali & Zhang, Zhi-Hai, 2021. "Reliable closed-loop supply chain design problem under facility-type-dependent probabilistic disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 180-209.
    7. Nader Azad & Elkafi Hassini, 2019. "A Benders Decomposition Method for Designing Reliable Supply Chain Networks Accounting for Multimitigation Strategies and Demand Losses," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(5), pages 1287-1312, September.
    8. Yun, Lifen & Wang, Xifu & Fan, Hongqiang & Li, Xiaopeng, 2020. "Reliable facility location design with round-trip transportation under imperfect information Part I: A discrete model," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    9. Zarrinpoor, Naeme & Fallahnezhad, Mohammad Saber & Pishvaee, Mir Saman, 2018. "The design of a reliable and robust hierarchical health service network using an accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(3), pages 1013-1032.
    10. Cheng, Chun & Yu, Qinxiao & Adulyasak, Yossiri & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2024. "Distributionally robust facility location with uncertain facility capacity and customer demand," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    11. Wang, Zhaodong & Xie, Siyang & Ouyang, Yanfeng, 2022. "Planning reliable service facility location against disruption risks and last-mile congestion in a continuous space," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 123-140.
    12. Yin, Yunqiang & Xu, Xinrui & Wang, Dujuan & Yu, Yugang & Cheng, T.C.E., 2024. "Two-stage recoverable robust optimization for an integrated location–allocation and evacuation planning problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Cheng, Chun & Qi, Mingyao & Zhang, Ying & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2018. "A two-stage robust approach for the reliable logistics network design problem," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 185-202.
    14. Fahimnia, Behnam & Jabbarzadeh, Armin, 2016. "Marrying supply chain sustainability and resilience: A match made in heaven," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 306-324.
    15. Afshin Kamyabniya & Antoine Sauré & F. Sibel Salman & Noureddine Bénichou & Jonathan Patrick, 2024. "Optimization models for disaster response operations: a literature review," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 46(3), pages 737-783, September.
    16. Yu, Guodong & Haskell, William B. & Liu, Yang, 2017. "Resilient facility location against the risk of disruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 82-105.
    17. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    18. Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Moghadam, Hani Shahmoradi, 2016. "Designing a supply chain resilient to major disruptions and supply/demand interruptions," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 121-149.
    19. Mengshi Lu & Lun Ran & Zuo-Jun Max Shen, 2015. "Reliable Facility Location Design Under Uncertain Correlated Disruptions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 445-455, October.
    20. Yu, Guodong & Zhang, Jie, 2018. "Multi-dual decomposition solution for risk-averse facility location problem," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 70-89.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:355:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s10479-024-05916-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.