IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v33y1999i7p511-534.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Railway traffic control and train scheduling based oninter-train conflict management

Author

Listed:
  • Sahin, Ismail

Abstract

This research deals with analyzing dispatchers' decision process in inter-train conflict resolutions and developing a heuristic algorithm for rescheduling trains by modifying existing meet/pass plans in conflicting situations in a single-track railway. We described the railway traffic management briefly to establish a sufficient ground for the problem definition. Train dispatchers currently carry out the rescheduling process. In order to model decision behaviour of train dispatchers, we assumed that they use a utility function of some weighted attributes of each conflicting train to determine (dynamic) priorities pair wise, and that he/she resolves conflicts according to the calculated values of dynamic priorities of trains. We determined the weights by analyzing the previous decisions of train dispatchers. This analysis is important to determine the effectiveness of decisions of train dispatchers respecting other solution techniques and is usually omitted in studies of railway traffic control. We used a systems approach in construction of the heuristic algorithm, which is based on inter-train conflict management. The kernel of this algorithm is the immediate conflict and its two alternative resolutions. The algorithm chooses the best alternative resolution, which causes less total consequential delay in the system due to the conflicting train being stopped. One of the most important features of the algorithm is to consider the effects of potential conflicts by using a look-ahead method. In the end we tested the methods for hypothetical problem instances and evaluated the results. These tests showed that the algorithm produced "good enough" schedules efficiently and effectively in conflicting situations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sahin, Ismail, 1999. "Railway traffic control and train scheduling based oninter-train conflict management," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(7), pages 511-534, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:33:y:1999:i:7:p:511-534
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191-2615(99)00004-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. V. Srinivasan & Allan Shocker, 1973. "Estimating the weights for multiple attributes in a composite criterion using pairwise judgments," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(4), pages 473-493, December.
    2. Richard L. Sauder & William M. Westerman, 1983. "Computer Aided Train Dispatching: Decision Support Through Optimization," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 24-37, December.
    3. Jovanovic, Dejan & Harker, Patrick T., 1990. "A Decision Support System for Train Dispatching: An Optimization-Based Methodology," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 31(1).
    4. V. Srinivasan & Allan Shocker, 1973. "Linear programming techniques for multidimensional analysis of preferences," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(3), pages 337-369, September.
    5. E. R. Petersen & A. J. Taylor, 1982. "A Structured Model for Rail Line Simulation and Optimization," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 192-206, May.
    6. David Kraay & Patrick T. Harker & Bintong Chen, 1991. "Optimal Pacing of Trains in Freight Railroads: Model Formulation and Solution," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(1), pages 82-99, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daganzo, Carlos F., 2007. "Corrigendum to "Urban gridlock: Macroscopic modeling and mitigation approaches" [Transportation Research Part B 41 (2007) 49-62]," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 379-379, March.
    2. Corman, F. & D’Ariano, A. & Pacciarelli, D. & Pranzo, M., 2012. "Optimal inter-area coordination of train rescheduling decisions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 71-88.
    3. Burdett, R.L. & Kozan, E., 2010. "A disjunctive graph model and framework for constructing new train schedules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 85-98, January.
    4. repec:iim:iimawp:12906 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Min, Yun-Hong & Park, Myoung-Ju & Hong, Sung-Pil & Hong, Soon-Heum, 2011. "An appraisal of a column-generation-based algorithm for centralized train-conflict resolution on a metropolitan railway network," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 409-429, February.
    6. Lawley, Mark & Parmeshwaran, Vijay & Richard, Jean-Philippe & Turkcan, Ayten & Dalal, Malay & Ramcharan, David, 2008. "A time-space scheduling model for optimizing recurring bulk railcar deliveries," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 438-454, June.
    7. Zhou, Xuesong & Zhong, Ming, 2005. "Bicriteria train scheduling for high-speed passenger railroad planning applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(3), pages 752-771, December.
    8. Zhou, Xuesong & Zhong, Ming, 2007. "Single-track train timetabling with guaranteed optimality: Branch-and-bound algorithms with enhanced lower bounds," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 320-341, March.
    9. Yu-Jun Zheng, 2018. "Emergency Train Scheduling on Chinese High-Speed Railways," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 1077-1091, October.
    10. Mascis, Alessandro & Pacciarelli, Dario, 2002. "Job-shop scheduling with blocking and no-wait constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(3), pages 498-517, December.
    11. Ghoseiri, Keivan & Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Asgharpour, Mohammad Jawad, 2004. "A multi-objective train scheduling model and solution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 927-952, December.
    12. Ballis, Athanasios & Golias, John, 2002. "Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 593-611, August.
    13. Huang, Wencheng & Zhang, Yue & Yu, Yaocheng & Xu, Yifei & Xu, Minhao & Zhang, Rui & De Dieu, Gatesi Jean & Yin, Dezhi & Liu, Zhanru, 2021. "Historical data-driven risk assessment of railway dangerous goods transportation system: Comparisons between Entropy Weight Method and Scatter Degree Method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghoseiri, Keivan & Szidarovszky, Ferenc & Asgharpour, Mohammad Jawad, 2004. "A multi-objective train scheduling model and solution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 927-952, December.
    2. Adenso-Díaz, B. & Oliva González, M. & González-Torre, P., 1999. "On-line timetable re-scheduling in regional train services," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 387-398, August.
    3. Jean-François Cordeau & Paolo Toth & Daniele Vigo, 1998. "A Survey of Optimization Models for Train Routing and Scheduling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 380-404, November.
    4. Halme, Merja & Kallio, Markku, 2011. "Estimation methods for choice-based conjoint analysis of consumer preferences," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(1), pages 160-167, October.
    5. Kraay, David R. & Harker, Patrick T., 1995. "Real-time scheduling of freight railroads," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 213-229, June.
    6. Oded Netzer & Olivier Toubia & Eric Bradlow & Ely Dahan & Theodoros Evgeniou & Fred Feinberg & Eleanor Feit & Sam Hui & Joseph Johnson & John Liechty & James Orlin & Vithala Rao, 2008. "Beyond conjoint analysis: Advances in preference measurement," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 337-354, December.
    7. Enrique Castillo & Inmaculada Gallego & José Ureña & José Coronado, 2009. "Timetabling optimization of a single railway track line with sensitivity analysis," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 17(2), pages 256-287, December.
    8. Hallowell, Susan F. & Harker, Patrick T., 1998. "Predicting on-time performance in scheduled railroad operations: methodology and application to train scheduling," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 279-295, May.
    9. Kadziński, MiŁosz & Greco, Salvatore & SŁowiński, Roman, 2012. "Extreme ranking analysis in robust ordinal regression," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 488-501.
    10. Leachman, Robert C. & Jula, Payman, 2012. "Estimating flow times for containerized imports from Asia to the United States through the Western rail network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 296-309.
    11. Kadziński, Miłosz & Wójcik, Michał & Ciomek, Krzysztof, 2022. "Review and experimental comparison of ranking and choice procedures for constructing a univocal recommendation in a preference disaggregation setting," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    12. Theodoros Evgeniou & Constantinos Boussios & Giorgos Zacharia, 2005. "Generalized Robust Conjoint Estimation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 415-429, May.
    13. Grigoroudis, Evangelos & Noel, Laurent & Galariotis, Emilios & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2021. "An ordinal regression approach for analyzing consumer preferences in the art market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 718-733.
    14. Mark Davison, 1988. "A reformulation of the general Euclidean model for the external analysis of preference data," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 53(3), pages 305-320, September.
    15. Olivier Toubia & Duncan I. Simester & John R. Hauser & Ely Dahan, 2003. "Fast Polyhedral Adaptive Conjoint Estimation," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 273-303.
    16. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    17. Li, Feng & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Gao, Zi-You, 2014. "Deadlock analysis, prevention and train optimal travel mechanism in single-track railway system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 385-414.
    18. Mishra, Sanjay & Umesh, U. N., 2005. "Determining the quality of conjoint analysis results using violation of a priori signs," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 301-311, March.
    19. B. P. S. Murthi & Sumit Sarkar, 2003. "The Role of the Management Sciences in Research on Personalization," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(10), pages 1344-1362, October.
    20. Olivier Toubia & Eric Johnson & Theodoros Evgeniou & Philippe Delquié, 2013. "Dynamic Experiments for Estimating Preferences: An Adaptive Method of Eliciting Time and Risk Parameters," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 613-640, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:33:y:1999:i:7:p:511-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.