IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v77y2015icp225-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating cycleway capacity and bicycle equivalent unit for electric bicycles

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Sheng
  • Qu, Xiaobo
  • Zhou, Dan
  • Xu, Cheng
  • Ma, Dongfang
  • Wang, Dianhai

Abstract

With the rapid increase of electric bicycles (E-bikes) in China, the heterogeneous bicycle traffic flow comprising regular bicycles and E-bikes using shared cycleway creates issues in terms of efficiency as well as safety. Capacity and bicycle equivalent units (BEUs) for E-bikes are two most important parameters for the planning, design, operation, and management of bicycle facilities. In this paper, eight traffic flow fundamental diagrams are developed for one-way cycleway capacity estimation, and a novel BEU estimation model is also proposed. Eleven datasets from different shared cycleway sections with different cycleway widths were collected in Hangzhou, China for estimation and evaluation purposes. The results indicate that, with around 70% share of E-bikes, the mean estimated capacity is 2348bicycle/h/m. The effects on the capacity of the proportions of E-bikes, gender of cyclists, age of cyclists, and cyclists carrying things were also analyzed. The results implied that the estimated capacity is independent of a cyclist’s gender and age, but increases with the proportion of E-bikes. According to this study, the mean BEU for the E-bike is 0.66, and the converted capacities of pure regular bicycles and pure E-bikes are 1800 and 2727bicycle/h/m, respectively. These findings can be used to propose practical countermeasures to improve the capacity of heterogeneous bicycle traffic flow on shared cycleway.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Sheng & Qu, Xiaobo & Zhou, Dan & Xu, Cheng & Ma, Dongfang & Wang, Dianhai, 2015. "Estimating cycleway capacity and bicycle equivalent unit for electric bicycles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 225-248.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:77:y:2015:i:c:p:225-248
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856415000993
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gould, Gregory & Karner, Alex, 2009. "Modeling Bicycle Facility Operation: a Cellular Automaton Approach," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt1xn1j5vh, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    2. Al-Kaisy, Ahmed F. & Hall, Fred L. & Reisman, Emily S., 2002. "Developing passenger car equivalents for heavy vehicles on freeways during queue discharge flow," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 725-742, October.
    3. Qu, Xiaobo & Wang, Shuaian & Zhang, Jin, 2015. "On the fundamental diagram for freeway traffic: A novel calibration approach for single-regime models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 91-102.
    4. Wang, Dianhai & Feng, Tianjun & Liang, Chunyan, 2008. "Research on bicycle conversion factors," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1129-1139, October.
    5. Shaheen, Susan & Guzman, Stacey & Zhang, Hua, 2010. "Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, Present, and Future," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt79v822k5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    6. Cherry, Christopher R. & Weinert, Jonathan X. & Yang, Xinmiao, 2009. "Comparative Environmental Impacts of Electric Bikes in China," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt16k918sh, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    7. Jonathan Weinert & Chaktan Ma & Christopher Cherry, 2007. "The transition to electric bikes in China: history and key reasons for rapid growth," Transportation, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 301-318, May.
    8. Shaheen, Susan A & Guzman, Stacey & Zhang, Hua, 2010. "Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, Present and Future," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6qg8q6ft, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    9. Jin, Sheng & Wang, Dian-Hai & Huang, Zhi-Yi & Tao, Peng-Fei, 2011. "Visual angle model for car-following theory," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 390(11), pages 1931-1940.
    10. Ruiz, Tomás & Bernabé, José C., 2014. "Measuring factors influencing valuation of nonmotorized improvement measures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 195-211.
    11. Zhang, Shuichao & Ren, Gang & Yang, Renfa, 2013. "Simulation model of speed–density characteristics for mixed bicycle flow—Comparison between cellular automata model and gas dynamics model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 392(20), pages 5110-5118.
    12. Webster, Nathan & Elefteriadou, Lily, 1999. "A simulation study of truck passenger car equivalents (PCE) on basic freeway sections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 323-336, June.
    13. Geoffrey Rose, 2012. "E-bikes and urban transportation: emerging issues and unresolved questions," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(1), pages 81-96, January.
    14. Wang, Haizhong & Li, Jia & Chen, Qian-Yong & Ni, Daiheng, 2011. "Logistic modeling of the equilibrium speed-density relationship," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(6), pages 554-566, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bagloee, Saeed Asadi & Sarvi, Majid & Wallace, Mark, 2016. "Bicycle lane priority: Promoting bicycle as a green mode even in congested urban area," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 102-121.
    2. Zhang, Jin & Qu, Xiaobo & Wang, Shuaian, 2018. "Reproducible generation of experimental data sample for calibrating traffic flow fundamental diagram," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 41-52.
    3. Li, Qiaoru & Zhang, Zhe & Li, Kun & Chen, Liang & Wei, Zhenlin & Zhang, Jingchun, 2020. "Evolutionary dynamics of traveling behavior in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    4. Paulsen, Mads & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2019. "Fast or forced to follow: A speed heterogeneous approach to congested multi-lane bicycle traffic simulation," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 72-98.
    5. Alexander Bigazzi & Robin Lindsey, 2019. "A utility-based bicycle speed choice model with time and energy factors," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 995-1009, June.
    6. Li, Yixin & Ni, Ying & Sun, Jian & Ma, Zian, 2020. "Modeling the illegal lane-changing behavior of bicycles on road segments: Considering lane-changing categories and bicycle heterogeneity," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    7. Li, Hongwei & Zhong, Xin & Zhang, Wenbo & Li, Sulan & Xing, Yingying, 2020. "An algorithm for e-bike equivalents at signalized intersections based on traffic conflict events number," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 78-95.
    8. Khashayar Kazemzadeh & Aliaksei Laureshyn & Lena Winslott Hiselius & Enrico Ronchi, 2020. "Expanding the Scope of the Bicycle Level-of-Service Concept: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(7), pages 1-30, April.
    9. Bai, Lu & Liu, Pan & Chan, Ching-Yao & Li, Zhibin, 2017. "Estimating level of service of mid-block bicycle lanes considering mixed traffic flow," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 203-217.
    10. Agarwal, Amit & Ziemke, Dominik & Nagel, Kai, 2020. "Bicycle superhighway: An environmentally sustainable policy for urban transport," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 519-540.
    11. Song, Jie & Zhang, Liye & Qin, Zheng & Ramli, Muhamad Azfar, 2021. "Where are public bikes? The decline of dockless bike-sharing supply in Singapore and its resulting impact on ridership activities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 72-90.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wolf, Angelika & Seebauer, Sebastian, 2014. "Technology adoption of electric bicycles: A survey among early adopters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 196-211.
    2. Thomas, Alainna, 2016. "A More Sustainable Minivan? An Exploratory Study of Electric Bicycle Use by San Francisco Bay Area Families," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt6g79m3xx, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    3. Wells, Peter & Lin, Xiao, 2015. "Spontaneous emergence versus technology management in sustainable mobility transitions: Electric bicycles in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 371-383.
    4. Rui Jiang & Mao-Bin Hu & Qing-Song Wu & Wei-Guo Song, 2017. "Traffic Dynamics of Bicycle Flow: Experiment and Modeling," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(3), pages 998-1008, August.
    5. Jun Li & Jiachao Shen & Bicen Jia, 2021. "Exploring Intention to Use Shared Electric Bicycles by the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    6. Zhao, Chunli & Nielsen, Thomas Alexander Sick & Olafsson, Anton Stahl & Carstensen, Trine Agervig & Meng, Xiaoying, 2018. "Urban form, demographic and socio-economic correlates of walking, cycling, and e-biking: Evidence from eight neighborhoods in Beijing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 102-112.
    7. Jones, Tim & Harms, Lucas & Heinen, Eva, 2016. "Motives, perceptions and experiences of electric bicycle owners and implications for health, wellbeing and mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 41-49.
    8. Esther Salmeron-Manzano & Francisco Manzano-Agugliaro, 2018. "The Electric Bicycle: Worldwide Research Trends," Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(7), pages 1-16, July.
    9. Gu, Tianqi & Kim, Inhi & Currie, Graham, 2019. "To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 122-147.
    10. Alexandros Nikitas, 2019. "How to Save Bike-Sharing: An Evidence-Based Survival Toolkit for Policy-Makers and Mobility Providers," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 11(11), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Tomasz Bieliński & Łukasz Dopierała & Maciej Tarkowski & Agnieszka Ważna, 2020. "Lessons from Implementing a Metropolitan Electric Bike Sharing System," Energies, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 13(23), pages 1-21, November.
    12. Li, Qiaoru & Zhang, Zhe & Li, Kun & Chen, Liang & Wei, Zhenlin & Zhang, Jingchun, 2020. "Evolutionary dynamics of traveling behavior in social networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 545(C).
    13. Levy, Nadav & Golani, Chen & Ben-Elia, Eran, 2019. "An exploratory study of spatial patterns of cycling in Tel Aviv using passively generated bike-sharing data," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 325-334.
    14. Zhou, Xiaolu & Wang, Mingshu & Li, Dongying, 2019. "Bike-sharing or taxi? Modeling the choices of travel mode in Chicago using machine learning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    15. Younes, Hannah & Nasri, Arefeh & Baiocchi, Giovanni & Zhang, Lei, 2019. "How transit service closures influence bikesharing demand; lessons learned from SafeTrack project in Washington, D.C. metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 83-92.
    16. Alain Quilliot & Antoine Sarbinowski & Hélène Toussaint, 2021. "Vehicle driven approaches for non preemptive vehicle relocation with integrated quality criterion in a vehicle sharing system," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 445-468, March.
    17. Luca Nitschke, 2020. "Reconstituting Automobility: The Influence of Non-Commercial Carsharing on the Meanings of Automobility and the Car," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    18. Jing Lan & Yuge Ma & Dajian Zhu & Diana Mangalagiu & Thomas F. Thornton, 2017. "Enabling Value Co-Creation in the Sharing Economy: The Case of Mobike," Sustainability, MDPI, Open Access Journal, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Rui Wang, 2011. "Environmental and resource sustainability of Chinese cities: A review of issues, policies, practices and effects," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 35(2), pages 112-121, May.
    20. Wang, Jueyu & Lindsey, Greg, 2019. "Do new bike share stations increase member use: A quasi-experimental study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 1-11.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:77:y:2015:i:c:p:225-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.